For the Model 1894, the “widow’s peak” hammer was used from the beginning of production through early 1903. Through the information in my research survey, the transition from the Type-1 (widow’s peak) to the Type-2 hammer took place in March/April 1903. I suspect the same is true for the Model 1892.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Bert H. said
For the Model 1894, the “widow’s peak” hammer was used from the beginning of production through early 1903. Through the information in my research survey, the transition from the Type-1 (widow’s peak) to the Type-2 hammer took place in March/April 1903. I suspect the same is true for the Model 1892.
Bert
What does the widows peak hammer look like?
Chuck,
To the best of my knowledge, all of the early Winchester models (rifles & carbines) have the widow’s peak style hammer. The Type-2 hammer has the same style checking (or knurling), but without the pointed peak. The Type-2 hammer was used from 1903 through early 1946, when it was replaced by the Type-3 Serrated hammer.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Shortgrub said
OK. Thought about this. Does the small curve on the crescent butt plate toe date to the same period?Tim
No, it does not. The down turned toe on the crescent butt plates was discontinued in the mid to late 1880s.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Bert H. said
Chuck,To the best of my knowledge, all of the early Winchester models (rifles & carbines) have the widow’s peak style hammer. The Type-2 hammer has the same style checking (or knurling), but without the pointed peak. The Type-2 hammer was used from 1903 through early 1946, when it was replaced by the Type-3 Serrated hammer.
Bert
Was this hammer knurling pattern stamped, machine cut or other??
Chris
1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member
"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington
clarence said
How did he know? I mean, upon what evidence? Factory records, testimony of a former employee, microscopic examination…
Good Morning Clarence,
Good questions! And I am not certain as to the exact source of his information. However, on page 63 of his book on the Model 1890, he states that two different craftsman used different tools to perform the work, and on page 64 he’s a bit more specific in that, “The hammers were checkered by hand by different craftsman, each using his own cutting tool.” This quote appears in a caption below the picture that shows a display of ten different hammer styles used on the Model 1890. The display is attributed to the Donald Tusher Collection.
James
jwm94 said
…he states that two different craftsman used different tools to perform the work, and on page 64 he’s a bit more specific in that, “The hammers were checkered by hand by different craftsman, each using his own cutting tool.”
Possible of course, but it just seems surprising that such an efficient, high-volume, company as Winchester had not developed a more cost-effective method of doing the job, such as stamping. But the above statement is merely that, not factual evidence, such as a company record of payments to men employed to checker hammers, or a report from someone who had seen the work being done. This checkering does not look to me as sharply cut as hand-cut checkering would be, and think, especially, of the difficulty of executing (without run-overs!) the “Ten Commandments” pattern.
1 Guest(s)
