“Do you think Lucid lines would have made all of these based off antique designs and chose to just freelance a Winchester mirror not based off an antique design?” prove it! Go out and acquire something from Lucid that backs up your belief. One need look no further than eBay to see fake Winchester items that were created and being offered for sale as genuine items! 

Does scientific analysis dating mirror to the 1890s based off of materials used help prove that it is real? You have stated this but never offered any proof of this. Post the report you keep citing. Would seem an easy thing to do!

Yes the mirror was reframed in London over 30 years ago but that is something I can’t control. 

None of us control the condition items are in when we acquire them but they do in fact affect the value. 

I’m just not sure why you want to keep arguing. We have all stated we are happy to eat crow if this thing is real and worth millions. Just go out and prove it. Do the work yourself, hire someone to do it or send the thing to an auction house that will do the work. We would all be thrilled if it is anywhere close to worth what you think it is. Prove us wrong and good luck!

1873man said
Also I don't see a screw on the bottom of the mag tube holding the plug in but the picture is no the right angle for seeing it.
Bob
  

Your right I missed that 

Bob

wolfbait said
I have no problem listing items with pictures on Gunbroker. I have 1500 feedback there as a seller. This forum does not let me post pictures.
Selling 2 parts just requires the action taken out of the stock. Saves the buyer of each the $18 addition USPS charges for over 30" packages. I have unfortunately had a couple of rifles damaged in shipping. Shorter packages have less chance of damage. I don't know what a 99%+ complete barreled action with Buehler mount and rings, unattached included, or an all original stock with a little wear would sell for individually. Or their demand. 
  

Wolf,  you should pony up our risibly small annual dues and become a WACA member. Failing that, you can email me the pix of your Featherweight or a link to where I can download them. Do that and I'll post them here for you. In a minute I'll PM you my email address. 

When it became time for me to sell several pieces of my collection. I broke down and ordered a group of six of the Cameron custom rifle box kits that include 3 layers of cross-linked foam - the stuff they make marine docking fenders from. You cut out the gun's outline from the middle layer with a hot knife. Wrap the gun in the provided anti-rust sheet, make a sandwich of the three foam layers and it's a close fit into the heavy duty cardboard box. My last cost for a kit, including the stiff UPS charge divided by six to get them to me from Lima, Ohio, was about $48 USD. And USPS will assess an overlength fee. BUT, if you explain it in advance, put in the additional terms, and explain what they are getting for the money -- I have never had shipping damage or had a buyer complain.  I've seen the outer box breached but never the foam sandwich. It is extremely resistant to a penetrating strike. 

Just a suggestion. 

wolfbait said
I have no problem listing items with pictures on Gunbroker. I have 1500 feedback there as a seller. This forum does not let me post pictures.
 
  

It does if you are a paid WACA member.  The price of admission is a minimal expense.

Bert - Admin

Zebulon said
I would never question your judgement; you've got the gun in your hands. 
I do wonder whether there were Model 94 carbines serialized n the low 2.7m range that were assembled with machined rather than sintered metal receivers. Your receiver doesn't appear to have been black chromed - I don't think it's late enough -- but neither does it exhibit the flaking and mottling of Dulite on sintered steel.  
My understanding of the sintered metal process is it is fully capable of making very precise parts but (1) the initial equipment. investment is huge; (2) the cost of creating a die is great, to the point you need to be making.enormous quantities of a part to justify the cost of the die; (3) the assembly technique of fitting sintered parts is different. You have a bin of the same part before you. You take one and try it. If it is oversized or undersized, you don't fettle it but put it back and try another until one fits. This can be done much faster and by less experienced people than by a skilled fitter with stones and abrasive papers. With excellent results, with practice.
But there is a learning curve. It strikes me that quality of production in 1964 was more likely variable rather than consistently bad. 
I have a late production Colt Trooper Mark III that is absolutely a credit to its maker. The lockwork is sintered and was assembled as above. I have also a 1955 Colt Three Fifty Seven, the Mark III's antecedent made the traditional way. The trigger stroke is different between the two - the later gun has coil springs and doesn't stack -- but both are of very high quality. I have owned earlier Mark III revolvers that were crude by comparison. 
So, like Schrodinger's cat, perhaps the early post 63 Model 94 can exhibit more than one state, inside its box.
  

I don't know if it will help but I just snapped two more photos of the receiver.  I find that the wear is even and pleasant. 

Bob

Selling 2 parts just requires the action taken out of the stock. Saves the buyer of each the $18 addition USPS charges for over 30" packages. I have unfortunately had a couple of rifles damaged in shipping. Shorter packages have less chance of damage. I don't know what a 99%+ complete barreled action with Buehler mount and rings, unattached included, or an all original stock with a little wear would sell for individually. Or their demand. 

1873man said
I would say the barrel was bobbed from the big chamfer in the ID and the saw marks. The dovetail for the mag tube band is not factory. Wrench marks on the breech flats.
Bob
  

This gun was aggressively cleaned by someone - even to the point they might have used a power tool - marks all over gun 

fred.lasor@gmail.com said
What's Poulin's buyer's premium?  My recollection is that Rock Island Auction gets 18%.  I think that's a lotta juice!
  

18.5% check or cash and 23% if paying by CC. They  are both steals compared to Morphy’s 23% for cash or check!