November 5, 2014

mrcvs said
Some auction sites already produce that which you seek. Questions and comments can be posted as a thread to this forum, for a critique, plus comments and questions. With one caveat. Auction houses exist to sell products. Sometimes what they write is hyperbole, lies, or fiction. Which is why posting here for commentary can sort fact from fiction.
Not that I don’t think a virtual site isn’t a good idea. But it would be a lot of effort.
Hi Ian-
I too am glad that RIA makes their back catalogs available to search on-line, and the fact that Pat Hogan was a commercial photographer before opening his own auction house really helps. Their Premier catalogs are as good as anything in the business…
Here’s my thing… Suppose I want to learn about 1873 Winchesters, I’m not a WACA member, and I haven’t yet “invested” in the right books. Either because I don’t know what they are or because they are prohibitively expensive for a newbie still trying to decide if collecting M1873s is something I want to do… What do I do??? I COULD search RIA catalogs, one auction at a time, and read their descriptions… Believe me, for the pre-64 M70 I’ve done just that (good AND bad) for the past decade… But will I come away from that exercise with an organized/structured understanding of M1873 basics? My sense is that I would not… If I already had that basic understanding, I might be able to read/interpret RIA catalogs better, but I don’t think I can learn (the bare bones basics of) what I need to know there…
I was thinking along the lines of an improved/expanded “Winchester Model Information” section under the “Resources” tab of this website. Not a giveaway of the level of detail afforded by specialty books, but more easily accessed (and comprehended) than a random search of RIA catalogs… Or (God help us!!!) GB/GI…
Why are so many badly done fake pre-64 M70s selling for $15-25K these days??? Because people don’t know what they’re supposed to look like… Sure Clarence… Maybe they’re all just rich fools who don’t care and “deserve” to be fleeced… Or maybe simply they don’t have access to unbiased information… Roger’s M70 book (good as it is) is of little help in this regard… Justin Hale (pre-64win.com) has done more recently (on their Facebook page and this Forum) to illustrate the pitfalls of M70 collecting than anyone since Vicvanb wrote his “How to Buy a Fake M70 Winchester” article in the Collector over a decade ago…
IMHO a “virtual museum” might (???) be a way of drawing more people into the hobby. Or it might not… We all bemoan the fact that Winchester collectors are dying out, but what are any of us (except Mark Douglas) doing about it??? The cost to WACA would be minimal (I think) involving only the cost of hosting more data on the site, but the investment of time would be substantial (meaning folks would have to want to do it)… I still think that the general lack of photography skills amongst accomplished gun collectors would be the biggest barrier…
Nonetheless, I understand the pushback… The membership thinks it’s folly… I can respect that and suspect that it is!!!
But if I get “motivated” I might do something like this for the pre-64 M70 outside of the WACA umbrella (just as a “prototype”). I don’t know anything about website creation/design but (2) of my (3) sons are software designers whose jobs entail stuff much more complicated than website design/maintenance, and (for a small fee) I might be able to impose upon one of them… WACA is GREAT!!! But it’s not everything…
Best,
Lou
WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters
November 7, 2015

I have a slightly different take on this excellent virtual museum idea. I love my little reference library but as modest as it is I can’t take it to shows or to the orphanage or other places I may encounter collectible Winchesters. An electronic reference accessed by a tablet or smart phone would be very helpful in making buying decisions. Without my reference library I’m unlikely to notice if a subject gun has the wrong sights, barrel or hammer, for example. OTOH hand a virtual museum would probably prove to be a much larger undertaking than I realize.
Mike
I mostly worry about information succession planning. I watch all the time as people pass away, retre, leave a job, etc. and their electronic information becomes inaccessible or rots away never to be seen again. On another thread we were pondering how George Madis’ papers and life’s work is probably sitting in a basement and no one’s heard from the family or has access….how did we let this happen?
I sincerely hope all of the experts here and folks with massive research databases and cataloguing of rifle photos have done some succession planning and made their electronic files and repositories retrievable in the event something happens.
Backing up all this data and keeping off site copies is just as important. I know why some of this can’t be public, someone would just steal it, charge for it and ruin it for everyone all over again, but we have to make sure these things are shareable when needed.
Jeremy, excellent point, I agree completely about the information succession planning! I have electronic copies in a safe deposit box with instructions to my heirs where and to who to send the thumb drives (2 with identical content, which is another story). More importantly, I have a designated “Battle Buddy” (Bert Hartman) who I send updated files to for extra insurance and he does the same to me. I would hate to see years of research, some of it unduplicatable, go by the wayside.
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
JWA said
Jeremy, excellent point, I agree completely about the information succession planning! I have electronic copies in a safe deposit box with instructions to my heirs where and to who to send the thumb drives (2 with identical content, which is another story). More importantly, I have a designated “Battle Buddy” (Bert Hartman) who I send updated files to for extra insurance and he does the same to me. I would hate to see years of research, some of it unduplicatable, go by the wayside.
Speaking of which, I planning to do another full back-up soon, and I will have it on a thumb drive when I see you in Cody. As of today, I have 28,460 files in 1,128 folders for a total of 28.6 GB of data electronically stored!
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
November 5, 2014

Hi Jeremy-
Good point!!! While not as extensive as Bert or Jeff’s, my files, including the survey(s), my collection “photo project” (and all the images I’ve downloaded/saved), book files, etc. are backed up in a couple places and I have shared a version of the merged survey with a couple WACA members. So at least everything won’t “go up in a cloud of smoke” when this hard drive fries itself…
I do not plan to put the actual survey (the spreadsheet with 20+ detail columns) in a publicly accessible place, e.g. website, as I’m concerned people would try to use it as a “serial number lookup” (akin to factory records – which they aren’t). Too much potential controversy when someone finds that a “common” gun has “morphed” into a “rare/valuable” one. Believe me… It happens… All too often… I think the survey is a great resource for summative analysis of production trends, but it’s NOT a factory ledger…
OTOH… [I seem to be just full of lame ideas lately… ] If WACA wanted to create a secure central repository (database), where people doing scholarly work could be granted access, I’d happily put my files there and update them periodically. Like examining documents in the McCracken Library collection… “Winchester Historian” Bert Hartman could be the archive’s curator, deciding who gets access!!! He doesn’t have enough to do, right???
Lou
WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters
Louis Luttrell said
Hi Jeremy-Good point!!! While not as extensive as Bert or Jeff’s, my files, including the survey(s), my collection “photo project” (and all the images I’ve downloaded/saved), book files, etc. are backed up in a couple places and I have shared a version of the merged survey with a couple WACA members. So at least everything won’t “go up in a cloud of smoke” when this hard drive fries itself…
I do not plan to put the actual survey (the spreadsheet with 20+ detail columns) in a publicly accessible place, e.g. website, as I’m concerned people would try to use it as a “serial number lookup” (akin to factory records – which they aren’t). Too much potential controversy when someone finds that a “common” gun has “morphed” into a “rare/valuable” one. Believe me… It happens… All too often…
I think the survey is a great resource for summative analysis of production trends, but it’s NOT a factory ledger…
OTOH… [I seem to be just full of lame ideas lately…
] If WACA wanted to create a secure central repository (database), where people doing scholarly work could be granted access, I’d happily put my files there and update them periodically. Like examining documents in the McCracken Library collection… “Winchester Historian” Bert Hartman could be the archive’s curator, deciding who gets access!!! He doesn’t have enough to do, right???
Lou
Agreed, I think a lot of industries/hobbyists/etc. all need to consider something similar for their craft. It’s clear WACA is a go-to of professional information and knowledgeable people…retaining and centralizing the info is an ongoing challenge…perhaps I’ll make it my retirement mission here in a few years!
Jeremy P said
I mostly worry about information succession planning. I watch all the time as people pass away, retre, leave a job, etc. and their electronic information becomes inaccessible or rots away never to be seen again. On another thread we were pondering how George Madis’ papers and life’s work is probably sitting in a basement and no one’s heard from the family or has access….how did we let this happen?I sincerely hope all of the experts here and folks with massive research databases and cataloguing of rifle photos have done some succession planning and made their electronic files and repositories retrievable in the event something happens.
Backing up all this data and keeping off site copies is just as important. I know why some of this can’t be public, someone would just steal it, charge for it and ruin it for everyone all over again, but we have to make sure these things are shareable when needed.
Lots of irreplaceable knowledge has been lost for the ages
“If you can’t convince them, confuse them”
President Harry S. Truman

I believe that there is a lot of knowledge today. Maybe more now then ever! With the resources that we have, and cheap phone service l believe this has helped us a lot in our collecting. I mean I can talk to a fellow collector for hours, and not worry about a expensive long distance phone bill. I have enjoyed doing this often. I agree with Louis. I have seen very expensive Model 70s sold that I thought were very suspect to say the least. It takes years, and hard work to gain knowledge. Thankfully people helped me when I was a young collector. I would return the favor, and help if someone had a question. Folks like Wayne Miller who is a true Gentleman, and one of the most knowledgeable Winchester man would always share his knowledge. This site has done well with that as well. A gun should go were it is appreciated. Our collections are kinda like museums. So, I think that the Model 51 is in a museum. A private one but still a museum.
I believe that there is a lot of knowledge today. Maybe more now then ever! Bo Rich said
You’re right: Google Books & other on-line search services have made hard-to-find publications like Arms & the Man easily accessible, though it’s hit or miss–there has to be some library that hasn’t thrown them out yet, & most critically, has been willing to digitize them–not by “AI,” but by many hours of tedious work turning page by page to copy them.
Yet what’s available this way is but the tip of the iceberg of published material that’s probably unrecoverable, defunct pubs like Precision Shooting, Accurate Rifle, Gun Report, & most recently, Double Gun Journal. A tremendous wealth of first-class historical research has appeared in Gun Digest, but not aware that the older material is available on-line.
Bert H. said
JWA said
Jeremy, excellent point, I agree completely about the information succession planning! I have electronic copies in a safe deposit box with instructions to my heirs where and to who to send the thumb drives (2 with identical content, which is another story). More importantly, I have a designated “Battle Buddy” (Bert Hartman) who I send updated files to for extra insurance and he does the same to me. I would hate to see years of research, some of it unduplicatable, go by the wayside.
Speaking of which, I planning to do another full back-up soon, and I will have it on a thumb drive when I see you in Cody. As of today, I have 28,460 files in 1,128 folders for a total of 28.6 GB of data electronically stored!
Well Bert I’ll see your 28.6 Gigs and raise you 136 Gigs.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
I cheated, those are upcoming books on other Winchester .22 models and the supporting references.
Maverick has us both beat on number of files though – wow!
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
JWA said
I cheated, those are upcoming books on other Winchester .22 models and the supporting references.Maverick has us both beat on number of files though – wow!
Best Regards,
Still, that is an impressive amount of stored data. I know that when I convert from Excel to PDF it (for publishing) it massively increases the file size.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
clarence said
JWA said
I cheated, those are upcoming books on other Winchester .22 models and the supporting references.
![]()
Including the one that wowed them in ’19 at Caldwell?
No, I just have an outline for that one, it will have to be a massive collaboration with Seewin. Just the “table of contents” is 19 pages and the book would be 2 volumes at least. It will have to wait until I retire and move back to Missouri. There are smaller fish to fry in the meantime.
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
November 5, 2014

Clearly you guys are only counting your alpha-numeric data files, e.g. Excel and Word… What about the images you’ve captured??? JWA alone must have a ton of them – not counting external downloaded/saved files??? And source document scans, like blueprints… I save my photos (the ones I take) as raw .tiff files (>100 MB each and I don’t even have the newest/fanciest digital SLR). My “processed” high-res .jpegs are still >10 MB… To post here I have to downsize everything…
HOLY COW!!! If you guys tossed those files in you’d each be in multi-terabyte territory!!! WACA needs to buy a bigger server… Or as Roy Scheider said in the movie “Jaws”… “We’re gonna need a bigger boat”…
WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters
Louis Luttrell said
Clearly you guys are only counting your alpha-numeric data files, e.g. Excel and Word… What about the images you’ve captured??? JWA alone must have a ton of them – not counting external downloaded/saved files??? And source document scans, like blueprints… I save my photos (the ones I take) as raw .tiff files (>100 MB each and I don’t even have the newest/fanciest digital SLR). My “processed” high-res .jpegs are still >10 MB… To post here I have to downsize everything…HOLY COW!!! If you guys tossed those files in you’d each be in multi-terabyte territory!!! WACA needs to buy a bigger server… Or as Roy Scheider said in the movie “Jaws”… “We’re gonna need a bigger boat”…
Lou,
My count does include image files. That stated, I use a photo editing program to crop and reduce the file size on all of the pictures that I have taken and captured. I quickly realized many years ago that I would rapidly run out of memory space if I did not crop & edit the photos.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
1 Guest(s)
