Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
The worry-free alternative to the whole factory letter neurosis thing
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 31, 2020 - 9:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yes, the whole, will it letter?  What does the letter mean?  Does the return and repair notation mean (fill in the blank).  Is the letter a fake?  Or, “I sure wish I’d never ordered that letter.”  On and on.  But there are another entire group of vintage Winchesters where all this is wiped off the table.  Many, many hundreds of thousands of them!  Yes, I am referring to those serial number ranges where the factory are gone.  Just in ’92 and ’94 – hundreds of thousands of each model.

Here are two of mine. Both are .32 specials (of course). These also serve the double duty of showing my preferred buttplate styles. 

The first one is a carbine with pistol grip checkered stocks, hard rubber shotgun buttplate (with widow’s peak), 3/4 length magazine and the Lyman receiver sight:

AmkSnHo.jpgImage Enlarger

q4wign7.jpgImage EnlargerChhV291.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 31, 2020 - 9:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here’s the second example.  Another ’94 Carbine.  .32 Special of course CoolThis is another pistol grip checkered carbine, full magazine, .32 special sight.  Winchester recoil pad.  Again, not in the letterable range.  You are free to make up your mind about it based on your own evaluation.  I’ve had it (and the other two) many years.  It’s fun to shoot and I like it a lot.  I really can’t see myself parting with the three .32 specials I’ve shown today. 

asMUDjP.jpgImage Enlarger

aWAfhM1.jpgImage Enlarger

5wTjlwW.jpgImage EnlargerbIdXVkL.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1710
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
May 31, 2020 - 9:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

 Steve, Before you buy you have to have all available information, the letter is information that helps you. Why would you pass on it? These Winchesters are expensive and a collector needs all the help you can get. I have guns that are out of letter range and I sometime wonder how they were configured originally. Those guns are easy to change configuration. T/R

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 31, 2020 - 9:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TR – You are talking about an ideal scenario.  I know some collectors who only buy letterable rifles.  They are poised to make   the phone confirmation if they find something of interest at a show – and this can work slick.  I’m just saying that it doesn’t always work out in an ideal way.  The one example I gave – does the return and repair notation explain some change from the original shipment?  Look at how often important features (e.g. engraving) are often not mentioned in the letter.  Look at how often many of us will agree what we are seeing in the letter is surely an error in the ledger.  The examples (and many others) are not rare occurrences.  The letter stuff is often not what it’s cracked up to be. 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10723
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 1, 2020 - 12:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Steve,

Do I have the serial numbers of your carbines for the research survey?

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 1, 2020 - 12:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Steve,
Do I have the serial numbers of your carbines for the research survey?
Bert  

Bert –

Yes you do.  I’ve had them a while 🙂

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1710
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
7
June 1, 2020 - 12:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
  Look at how often important features (e.g. engraving) are often not mentioned in the letter.  Look at how often many of us will agree what we are seeing in the letter is surely an error in the ledger.  The examples (and many others) are not rare occurrences.  The letter stuff is often not what it’s cracked up to be.   

   Steve, I have to disagree, there are errors but not as often as you think. The letter is a starting point, guns change over time and Winchester didn’t do it! Old surveys are very revealing and worth the time to check out before you buy. I have never done anything in my life that’s “worry-free”. If you can’t stand the risk, buy new with a warranty. T/R

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 1, 2020 - 12:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TR said

   Steve, I have to disagree, there are errors but not as often as you think. The letter is a starting point, guns change over time and Winchester didn’t do it! Old surveys are very revealing and worth the time to check out before you buy. I have never done anything in my life that’s “worry-free”. If you can’t stand the risk, buy new with a warranty. T/R  

TR – your suggestion is logical.  It’s just that I really dislike new guns.  I find it ironic how some top conditioned collector rifles that are out there – letter 100% – but they are fakes (i.e. clones). 

I enjoy collecting.  It’s been my only hobby my whole life.  There’s an element to our hobby that I don’t find enjoyable.  That part is the deception, greed, fakery and the like.  I’ve seen this aspect grow immensely during the last 50 years. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 1, 2020 - 4:51 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TR said
 Steve, Before you buy you have to have all available information, the letter is information that helps you. Why would you pass on it? These Winchesters are expensive and a collector needs all the help you can get. I have guns that are out of letter range and I sometime wonder how they were configured originally. Those guns are easy to change configuration. T/R  

I agree, not a ‘neurosis thing’ but a great tool, why not take advantage of it. I collect antique Winchesters and all I’ve purchased to date “letter”. 

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4969
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
June 1, 2020 - 5:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Oh, no! Not another 32 Special fan! 

 

Wink

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
11
June 1, 2020 - 9:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
Here’s the second example.  Another ’94 Carbine.  .32 Special of course

I really can’t see myself parting with the three .32 specials I’ve shown today. 

Yes a 32 fan…I think I’m going to like steve004

Rick C(AG)

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
June 2, 2020 - 6:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The June calender picture is of a beautiful 1876 Winchester SN 3254. I happen to have 1876 Winchester SN 3267. It

is a plain vanilla tired old gun. I got it lettered and it says “TRIGGER : SET”. It does not have a set trigger. I called museum and was told that the set trigger had been removed and replaced with plain trigger. If my wife went to sell this after I am gone the buyer would question if somebody had altered it when in fact it left factiry that way. I told the man at the museum that info would have been nice in the letter. The finsh is varnish which is chipping, the rifling is thin, very little pitting. With .456 lead bullets it keyholes at 100 yards, with jacketed bullets it gets about 5″ pattern at 100 yards (being shot by 81 year old eyes). Foolish or not I paid $3200 for it (don’t tell my wife).

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
June 3, 2020 - 2:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
The June calender picture is of a beautiful 1876 Winchester SN 3254. I happen to have 1876 Winchester SN 3267. It

is a plain vanilla tired old gun. I got it lettered and it says “TRIGGER : SET”. It does not have a set trigger. I called museum and was told that the set trigger had been removed and replaced with plain trigger. If my wife went to sell this after I am gone the buyer would question if somebody had altered it when in fact it left factiry that way. I told the man at the museum that info would have been nice in the letter. The finsh is varnish which is chipping, the rifling is thin, very little pitting. With .456 lead bullets it keyholes at 100 yards, with jacketed bullets it gets about 5″ pattern at 100 yards (being shot by 81 year old eyes). Foolish or not I paid $3200 for it (don’t tell my wife).  

Over the past several decades, I’ve seen more examples than I can count where the factory letter has provided complication vs. clarification.  This seems another example.  By the way, it sounds like this rifle could be counted on to shoot a deer at 100 yards.  Sounds like the shooter can be counted on too  🙂

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4281
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
June 3, 2020 - 2:48 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said   I happen to have 1876 Winchester SN 3267. It is a plain vanilla tired old gun. I got it lettered and it says “TRIGGER : SET”. It does not have a set trigger. I called museum and was told that the set trigger had been removed and replaced with plain trigger. 

Does the tang have the cuts for the set trigger? If it just has the plain trigger and the serial number is good, it has to be the way it left the factory. It was quite common for a set trigger to fail, and need repair or they would just convert it back to a plain trigger to eliminate the chance.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
June 3, 2020 - 4:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I find no evidence of cuts for set trigger on this 1876 Winchester. I compared it to my 1885 with a single set trigger and they are not alike. The SN on the bottom of the tang is 3267 and on the side of the tang are the nos. 102 and 1937. These nos. also appear on the top inletting of the stock so I know the stock and receiver match. Also, the letter states that this rifle reached the warehouse on Sept. 13, 1878 and was shipped out on July 29, 1880. They found no buyers for a set trigger in that time? Don

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4281
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
June 3, 2020 - 5:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

What I find surprising is the two sets of assemble numbers. Normally there is one or none at all. If it was returned to the factory they would X out the old number and stamp a new one. I would say it went back  and was changed but the old number was not X’d out. You should also see the numbers under the butt plate at the toe.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
June 3, 2020 - 12:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

Over the past several decades, I’ve seen more examples than I can count where the factory letter has provided complication vs. clarification.  This seems another example.  By the way, it sounds like this rifle could be counted on to shoot a deer at 100 yards.  Sounds like the shooter can be counted on too  🙂  

I know of no process that’s perfect, and I would bet that the % of Cody Letter error is VERY SMALL compared to the overall over the years.

The Cody letter is just one tool (although a very good one) to be used where applicable with others in authenticating Winchesters. 

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
June 3, 2020 - 1:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I just checked and there are no additional nos. under the crescent butt plate nor the end of the stock. Regarding letters, I also have a letter for my 1885 sporting rifle. The letter states all correct info except “TRIGGER: PLAIN”. This rifle has a single set trigger which I think is original to the rifle but I have no proof. Strange that both letters are erroneous regarding triggers.

Don

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10723
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
June 3, 2020 - 2:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

What is the serial number on your Model 1885 ? Can you post (or send me) a clear picture of the lower tang and action with the lever fully open ? Does the set trigger function properly ?

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 341
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
June 4, 2020 - 2:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I saw a very nice first model 1873 yesterday, SN 3680 with 30 inch octagon barrel and set trigger.  It letters as a 30 inch round barrel with set trigger.  So a buyer would be wondering was the warehouse ledger in error?   Or did someone switch out the lower tang?  My good friend win4575 mentioned checking the contour, fit and finish of the lower tang.  

So, fellow collectors, here is a classic case of a gun that does not letter.  What do you think?  Round up the usual suspects?

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: tsillik, cranky2, TR, gene66
Guest(s) 151
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6280
TXGunNut: 4969
Chuck: 4571
1873man: 4281
steve004: 4160
Big Larry: 2323
twobit: 2291
TR: 1710
mrcvs: 1706
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12648
Posts: 109979

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1745
Members: 8791
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation