Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
The worry-free alternative to the whole factory letter neurosis thing
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
June 4, 2020 - 2:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Attached are photos of my museum letters and my 1876 and 1885 winchesters. The 1876 apparently was machined and fitted for a set trigger (note the slot behind the trigger) and subsequently was refitted for a plain trigger. That may explain the nos. 1937 and the 102 on the tang and the stock. The finish on this 1876 looks like varnish which is chipping. The 1885 is fitted with a single set trigger and a hammer which has the brass fly. This set trigger iworks but is fussy to adjust. InterestinglyP1020338-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1020340-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1020341-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1020319.JPGImage EnlargerP1020323.JPGImage EnlargerP1020324.JPGImage EnlargerP1020346.JPGImage EnlargerP1020330-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1020337-1-2.JPGImage EnlargerP1020329-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1020344.JPGImage EnlargerP1020347.JPGImage EnlargerP1020348.JPGImage Enlarger this SN is 19371.

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
June 4, 2020 - 4:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have rifles that I have letters for.  For some, it’s a very neat addition.  For others, not.  I think a lot of nice rifles, that by most experienced collectors judge as correct, are spoiled by a letter that either has the wrong information, a lack of information or creates an enigma.  Then everyone fusses over and speculates what the letter stated or didn’t state.  And the owner is left with having to come up with an explanation or, “story” when he sells it.  The example Bill gives above, as well as the other examples provided, are never found in some of the other genre’s of rifles I collect (i.e. there are no surviving factory records).  I’m not making a case against the factory information, I’ve just seen too many examples over the years where people get all twisted up on what the letter says – and good rifles end up getting a raw deal.  I will concede this does help keep boredom away. 

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
23
June 4, 2020 - 4:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If it’s a letter or no sale, a fella is gonna miss out on a lot of nice guns. Just need to be diligent in assessing it’s authenticity.

RickC

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
June 4, 2020 - 5:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
The 1885 is fitted with a single set trigger and a hammer which has the brass fly.

If the fly is brass, it’s a non-factory replacement.

Hear a lot of complaints about the SST, but ones I’ve used worked just fine. 

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
June 4, 2020 - 5:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said 
I think a lot of nice rifles, that by most experienced collectors judge as correct, are spoiled by a letter that either has the wrong information, a lack of information or creates an enigma. 

That’s exactly the case with a S&W I have, which has grips that were optional at the time, but aren’t recorded on the factory letter. From evidence I won’t go into, I’m SURE the grips were put there by the factory, but somehow it wasn’t recorded–which on this particular gun is about a $1000 omission.   

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10726
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
June 4, 2020 - 5:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
                                                                                                                                                                                                              Attached are photos of my museum letters and my 1876 and 1885 winchesters. The 1876 apparently was machined and fitted for a set trigger (note the slot behind the trigger) and subsequently was refitted for a plain trigger. That may explain the nos. 1937 and the 102 on the tang and the stock. The finish on this 1876 looks like varnish which is chipping. The 1885 is fitted with a single set trigger and a hammer which has the brass fly. This set trigger works but is fussy to adjust. Interestingly this SN is 19371.                                                                                                                                      P1020341-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1020319.JPGImage EnlargerP1020329-1.JPGImage EnlargerP1020344.JPGImage Enlarger  

If your Model 1885 has a brass fly, it is not factory original, which would explain why it “fussy” to adjust.  The fly should be steel.  I am inclined to believe that the factory letter for your Model 1885 is correct in regards to it being manufactured with a Plain trigger.  I suspect (based on the incorrect fly) that somebody other than Winchester converted it to a single set trigger.  With the Model 1885, post factory modifications (upgrades) were relatively common practice.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1710
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
June 4, 2020 - 5:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

  I am glad to see the letter posted. That 76 is a example of the value of a letter, it states that it was changed at the factory explaining the cut in the lower tang and the duel assembly numbers. Without the letter the seller would have to invent a story to explain the slot, with the letter you just lay it under the gun when you put it on the table. T/R

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 482
Member Since:
March 21, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
June 4, 2020 - 8:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TR said
  I am glad to see the letter posted. That 76 is a example of the value of a letter, it states that it was changed at the factory explaining the cut in the lower tang and the duel assembly numbers. Without the letter the seller would have to invent a story to explain the slot, with the letter you just lay it under the gun when you put it on the table. T/R  

 

I agree. 

Considering the Cody letter very low margin for error, reasonable cost and especially how much these Winchesters cost I don’t understaand why anyone would not letter a letter-able rifle prior to purchase. 

IMG_0805-Copy-Copy-Copy.JPG

Winchester Model 1873 44-40 circa 1886

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
29
June 4, 2020 - 10:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TR said
  I am glad to see the letter posted. That 76 is a example of the value of a letter, it states that it was changed at the factory explaining the cut in the lower tang and the duel assembly numbers. Without the letter the seller would have to invent a story to explain the slot, with the letter you just lay it under the gun when you put it on the table. T/R  

I agree – it is VERY helpful that the letter explained what happened.  However, in my experience it is very rare that letter actually, “explains” something.  Good grief, how often do we see a return and repair notation with no explanation of what happened?  As you correctly suggest, if the letter didn’t happen to, “explain” what happened, the seller would have to formulate some sort of story.  And then we’re back to, “how much for just the gun and not the story?” 

As I said, letters are great when it all falls into place, but there’s also a lot of nice (and original) guns out there that get short changed.  Their tarnished reputation can lessen the pride in ownership and create a haggling toehold for the buyer when it comes time to sell. 

I’m not just focusing on Winchesters.  Clarence’s story about his S&W is another example.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 341
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
30
June 4, 2020 - 10:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Steve raises a good point.  I have seen a rifle that had this for its shipping information:

Received in warehouse September 23, 1882
Shipped from warehouse on September 23, 1882
Returned by Burkhard December 1882
Shipped July 6, 1883 order # 5392

What we don’t know is:

Who was Burkhard and why was the rifle returned?  No record of repairs.  Maybe it was a demonstrator model for a salesman?

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
31
June 4, 2020 - 11:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have a few repair & return with no explanation of the repair work.

RickC

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
32
June 5, 2020 - 12:50 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

RickC said
I have a few repair & return with no explanation of the repair work.

RickC  

Sometimes the “R&R” speaks for itself…if you have ears to hear.  For ex., I have an ’85 built as a .22 Short, not long afterwards took a “R&R” vacation, & now wears a .22LR brl with all the right markings; clear what was done.  FAR from detracting from this gun in my estimation, the “R&R” adds to its history, because it can be deduced that the original buyer was unsatisfied with his Short (with good reason!) & went to the trouble of correcting his mistake.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4282
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
33
June 5, 2020 - 2:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hockett said
Steve raises a good point.  I have seen a rifle that had this for its shipping information:

Received in warehouse September 23, 1882
Shipped from warehouse on September 23, 1882
Returned by Burkhard December 1882
Shipped July 6, 1883 order # 5392

What we don’t know is:

Who was Burkhard and why was the rifle returned?  No record of repairs.  Maybe it was a demonstrator model for a salesman?  

Burkhard was a hunter that bought the gun and took it out West and missed a big Moose so when he came home he sent it back to Winchester and said it didn’t shoot straight and got his money back just like Cabela’s. I have seen entries like that before in the ledgers.

I look at a Winchester letter as a tool to help me decide if I’m going to buy a gun. If I like the gun, the price and it letters we have a deal. If it doesn’t letter and I still like the gun then I have to decide if the gun is worth what I going to pay knowing it does not letter and knowing it will never be worth what the gun would be worth if it did letter. You will always have guns that don’t letter clean either from the fault of Winchester or someones else’s aftermarket work. The Winchester letter will always be available so there isn’t much you can do about it. You can always buy guns that don’t have records and you then have to judge them by their own merits.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
34
June 5, 2020 - 2:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Excellent reply Bob. Thanks for sharing.

RickC

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
35
June 5, 2020 - 3:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said

Burkhard was a hunter that bought the gun and took it out West and missed a big Moose so when he came home he sent it back to Winchester and said it didn’t shoot straight and got his money back just like Cabela’s.

Winchester, like every other mfgr., “aimed to please” in those days…up to a point!  “Missing your moose,” or any similar gross incompetence, was beyond that point, I would guess.  I think Bill Hocketts’s suggestion is much more plausible–that “Burkhard,” if not a company employee, was someone well enough known to the company that no further description of him was considered necessary.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1710
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
36
June 5, 2020 - 1:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Kevin Jones said

 

I agree. 

Considering the Cody letter very low margin for error, reasonable cost and especially how much these Winchesters cost I don’t understaand why anyone would not letter a letter-able rifle prior to purchase.   

   Well said. When you get the information prior to purchase you can make a decision based on what you see and what the letter is going to say. No surprises! T/R

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
37
June 5, 2020 - 2:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I once bought a 94 short rifle. It was 1918 DOM so no configuration details in the letter available.
Not saying it can’t be done, but it’s a little harder to fake one of the short rifles that has the reduced forestock(8 3/8 vrs 9 3/8) & rear sight dovetail an inch shorter.
I generally concur with TR on the value of the letter, but I can’t dismiss every 94 without it.
I based my purchase on the sellers reputation, condition, & price. Extreme high value pieces might be another story for me & only if lettered.

RickC

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4571
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
38
June 5, 2020 - 5:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

RickC said
I once bought a 94 short rifle. It was 1918 DOM so no configuration details in the letter available.
Not saying it can’t be done, but it’s a little harder to fake one of the short rifles that has the reduced forestock(8 3/8 vrs 9 3/8) & rear sight dovetail an inch shorter.
I generally concur with TR on the value of the letter, but I can’t dismiss every 94 without it.
I based my purchase on the sellers reputation, condition, & price. Extreme high value pieces might be another story for me & only if lettered.

RickC  

Rick in the beginning I relied on other collectors/dealers to help me out.  But, you need to get to a point that you know if the gun feels right or not.  The letter or search form is just one of the tools to assist in the process.  Actually I still ask for help when I can.  All the guns I own have letters if available.  There was a time I quit bothering but I eventually got a package deal and lettered about a dozen at one time.  No surprises, lucky me. 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10726
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
39
June 5, 2020 - 5:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bill Hockett said
Steve raises a good point.  I have seen a rifle that had this for its shipping information:

Received in warehouse September 23, 1882
Shipped from warehouse on September 23, 1882
Returned by Burkhard December 1882
Shipped July 6, 1883 order # 5392

What we don’t know is:

Who was Burkhard and why was the rifle returned?  No record of repairs.  Maybe it was a demonstrator model for a salesman?  

Bill,

In answer to your question, “Burkhard” was a Winchester retail store.  They ordered and sold a lot of Winchester firearms over at least a 30-year time period.  I have encountered at least a dozen different ledger entries in the Model 1885 records that have “Ret’d by Burkhard” written in the remarks column.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
40
June 5, 2020 - 5:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Another variant of the, “letter” phenomenon that I see frequently – seller’s advertise that a letter goes with the rifle – but they don’t show a picture of the letter.  Often, their ad states, “all features verified by Cody.”  In most these cases, the seller does actually have the letter, and it is often a legitimate (i.e. non-faked) letter.  However, the rub comes in with the seller’s interpretation of the letter.  So, you get the rifle, there’s something that doesn’t match the letter.  You call the seller and ask him, and he says, “well yeah, that’s covered in the letter.”  You ask where?  He says, “that was changed when it was returned – the letter says returned on xx/xx/xxxx (but the letter continues no explanatory information). 

I apologize for probably beating a dead horse.  I am trying to provide examples of the many shades of grey with the letter phenomenon.  Between letters sometimes having wrong information, missing or incomplete information and information subject to interpretation, it’s not as tidy as we would like.  I can’t began to count all of the examples I’ve seen that fall into one or more of the categories I have mentioned.  

I’m thinking right now of that M1876 1 of 1000 recently up for auction by RIA.  It has a letter, but wait … the letter makes no notation of being a 1 of 1000… but wait… Mr. Hall knows of two other authentic rifles with the 1 of 1000 markings – that were not mentioned in the records… so…………… if two others weren’t recorded correctly, that makes this one correct?  I’m going to go out and do some yard work – and forget about, “letters” for a while. Embarassed

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online:
Guest(s) 127
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6281
TXGunNut: 4970
Chuck: 4571
1873man: 4282
steve004: 4160
Big Larry: 2324
twobit: 2291
TR: 1710
mrcvs: 1706
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12650
Posts: 109995

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1745
Members: 8791
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation