Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1886 40 Express
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5451
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
41
July 20, 2024 - 9:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Blue Ridge Parson said

IMG_5446.jpegImage Enlarger

  

Now this is quite educational. Knowing absolutely nothing about the express rounds, the cutaway shown above would lead me to conclude that the copper tubing acts as a sort of hollow point round, promoting faster expansion, and also would reduce the weight of the bullet, thus giving faster speed and flatter trajectory.  Was that the express intent (pun intended) of Winchester, or was something else at play.

BRP

  

Sometimes an express round is just a lighter bullet, like the 45-90.  For the ones that have the tube I believe it was for expansion.  There are some rounds that have just a hole for the expansion.  I believe these were called a Gould.  Not sure what you’d call the 45-82?  It is 45-90 length but has a 400 grain bullet.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6020
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
42
July 20, 2024 - 10:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Blue Ridge Parson said

IMG_5446.jpegImage Enlarger

  

Now this is quite educational. Knowing absolutely nothing about the express rounds, the cutaway shown above would lead me to conclude that the copper tubing acts as a sort of hollow point round, promoting faster expansion, and also would reduce the weight of the bullet, thus giving faster speed and flatter trajectory.  Was that the express intent (pun intended) of Winchester, or was something else at play.

BRP

  

In theory the tube would shift the center of balance rearward and may allow the use of a lighter bullet in faster twist barrels since the formula for optimal twist rate is based on bullet length, not weight. I don’t know about the effect on expansion but with all the noise about the nylon bullet tips lately I suspect expansion was a goal as these were hunting rounds. It seems today’s whiz kids are up on their history. That’s encouraging!

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5451
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
43
July 20, 2024 - 10:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Faster twist stabilizes heavier bullets.  Yes with the same bullet shape the heavier ones can be longer.  But depending on the type of ogive some lighter ones can have a longer OAL. The hunting bullets with plastic tips have ribs inside to lock the jacket to the core for expansion. Target bullets with the same tips do not lock to the core.  I shoot some 155 grain bullets that are longer than the 168’s but they both stabilize with the same twist.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12325
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
44
July 21, 2024 - 1:34 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Maverick said

Bert H. said

40 EX. U.M.C. – flat copper tube, no “X” marking

40 EX. W.R.A.Co. – rounded copper tube no “X” marking (just like the picture Chuck posted of the 40-75 WRCAo. ctg.)

45 EX. U.M.C. – flat copper tub, no “X” marking)

45 EX. W.R.A.Co. – flat copper tube “X’ marked

50-95 W.C.F. W.R.A.Co. – flat copper tube “X” marked

Bert,

What is the approx. diameter of the copper tube on the .40 Cal Winchester Cartridge? Is it the same for the UMC counterpart?

What does the diameter of your 45 WRACo copper tube measure? Is it the same for the UMC counterpart?

 

My research notes have the 45 cal. tube to have a diameter of .225″. I thought that they used the same size tubes for all the various express calibers. Is there a difference in size between the 45 and 50?

IMG_5446.jpegImage Enlarger

Sincerely,

Maverick

  

The 40 EX (40-110) cartridges have a .150″ diameter copper pellet (both the WRACo and UMC).  The 45 EX cartridges have a .225″ diameter copper pellet/tube, as do the 50-95 WCF bullets.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 760
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
45
July 21, 2024 - 2:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck, BRP, etc.  I called several times yesterday and didn’t get any answer.  About bet he has gone to visit his daughter and her family in  TX.  By the time he returns, and I get an answer, I will have lost this thread.  But I have hope I won’t.  If I was a betting man, I would guess the “express” tube functioned to keep the hollow point from mashing in as the cartridges were handled, etc.  I think the lead bullets back then were pretty soft.  Possibly the tube also helped initiate expansion some like our current tipped bullets, but think the protection of the cavity and the opening maybe more important.  Just my take as I’ve not read anywhere on this.  Or that I recall at least.  Tim

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5451
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
46
July 21, 2024 - 4:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

tim tomlinson said
Chuck, BRP, etc.  I called several times yesterday and didn’t get any answer.  About bet he has gone to visit his daughter and her family in  TX.  By the time he returns, and I get an answer, I will have lost this thread.  But I have hope I won’t.  If I was a betting man, I would guess the “express” tube functioned to keep the hollow point from mashing in as the cartridges were handled, etc.  I think the lead bullets back then were pretty soft.  Possibly the tube also helped initiate expansion some like our current tipped bullets, but think the protection of the cavity and the opening maybe more important.  Just my take as I’ve not read anywhere on this.  Or that I recall at least.  Tim

  

Tim, I’ll try to remember too.  The copper tube was to aid in the expansion of the bullet on impact.  Not sure if it worked any better than a hollow point.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5451
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
47
July 21, 2024 - 4:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

  

I’m not up to speed on .70-150 cartridges.  Were some of the headstamped? If so, just manufacturer or caliber designation as well?

  

I can’t remember but there is one of the Winchester cartridge boards with one of these on the top corner.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5451
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
48
July 21, 2024 - 5:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said

Blue Ridge Parson said

IMG_5446.jpegImage Enlarger

  

Now this is quite educational. Knowing absolutely nothing about the express rounds, the cutaway shown above would lead me to conclude that the copper tubing acts as a sort of hollow point round, promoting faster expansion, and also would reduce the weight of the bullet, thus giving faster speed and flatter trajectory.  Was that the express intent (pun intended) of Winchester, or was something else at play.

BRP

  

In theory the tube would shift the center of balance rearward and may allow the use of a lighter bullet in faster twist barrels since the formula for optimal twist rate is based on bullet length, not weight. I don’t know about the effect on expansion but with all the noise about the nylon bullet tips lately I suspect expansion was a goal as these were hunting rounds. It seems today’s whiz kids are up on their history. That’s encouraging!

 

Mike

  

Here is the tool I use.  There is some guesstimating that has to be done for some of our older bullets.

https://bergerbullets.com/twist-rate-calculator/

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
49
July 21, 2024 - 8:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

This has been interesting and educational.  It prompted me to open a box with some cartridges I have  – that I haven’t looked at in (many years).  Here’s a .45-85 I have:

http://i.imgur.com/NrYX2bm.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/xjUmO8l.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
50
July 21, 2024 - 8:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here’s a .40-70 I have.  I’ve always thought it was the .40-70 WCF for the M1886 (and two M1895 .40-70 Marlines I had).  Remind me what the S and H stand for:

http://i.imgur.com/NG6TPfa.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/DHMMaMn.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
51
July 21, 2024 - 8:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

This is my favorite .45-90 factory loading:

http://i.imgur.com/Os7NQGo.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/B0WdLru.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/R7k2F4h.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
52
July 21, 2024 - 9:02 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

A .45-75.  Again, with the S and H marking:

http://i.imgur.com/BROZPEl.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/kAYKdXG.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
53
July 21, 2024 - 9:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

A pair of .50-110 Express.  They both have the copper tube with the X  The cartridges are marked identically but if they were in a full box, you could pick the headstamps out as not being precisely the same:

http://i.imgur.com/cN4y5g1.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/cXsstyK.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/6EG6H1g.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/hrbXeKb.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
54
July 21, 2024 - 9:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

On the topic of .50-110, here’s one that’s a bit different:

http://i.imgur.com/VJBdCWz.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/ioTzsu9.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/r1TXN47.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
55
July 21, 2024 - 9:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

On the topic of .50 calibers – here’s a group – .50-70 shot, .50-95 shot, .50-110 shot and .50-110 bulleted.  They will all chamber in my Standard Arms .50 caliber “CAMP .50”.  The only difference is the .50-70 won’t clear the ejection port as the rim is too wide.  

This is a firearm that supposedly chambered a proprietary cartridge – both a “buck” version and a “ball” version.  From what I can tell, not a single living human has actually seen one of these cartridges. 

http://i.imgur.com/wWTTDZ9.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12325
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
56
July 21, 2024 - 9:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said
On the topic of .50-110, here’s one that’s a bit different:

http://i.imgur.com/VJBdCWz.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/ioTzsu9.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/r1TXN47.jpgImage Enlarger

  

Steve,

That is a smokeless powder loaded Shot shell made specifically for the Single Shot rifle.  I have a full box of 50-95 WCF shot shells that are nearly identical.

Bert

50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-1.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-2.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-4.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-5.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-6.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-7.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-8.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-11.jpegImage Enlarger

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
57
July 21, 2024 - 9:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

steve004 said

On the topic of .50-110, here’s one that’s a bit different:

http://i.imgur.com/VJBdCWz.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/ioTzsu9.jpgImage Enlarger

http://i.imgur.com/r1TXN47.jpgImage Enlarger

  

Steve,

That is a smokeless powder loaded Shot shell made specifically for the Single Shot rifle.  I have a full box of 50-95 WCF shot shells that are nearly identical.

Bert

50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-1.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-2.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-4.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-5.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-6.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-7.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-8.jpegImage Enlarger50-95-WCF-Shot-Cartridge-box-11.jpegImage Enlarger

 

  Bert – that’s a cool box and cool cartridges.  I vaguely seem to recall when it came up for sale?  You haven’t owned it for a lot of years?  If I’m right, I recall having some interest as I thought it would go well with my CAMP 50.  Also, if I recall correctly, it wasn’t bargain priced.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12325
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
58
July 21, 2024 - 10:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Steve,

I have owned that box for 18-years now.  It was not cheap when I bought it from Walt Hallstein, and it is one of only two known complete boxes.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4916
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
59
July 21, 2024 - 10:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Steve,

I have owned that box for 18-years now.  It was not cheap when I bought it from Walt Hallstein, and it is one of only two known complete boxes.

Bert

  

Bert – do you recall another partial box that came up for sale in more recent years?  I don’t think it was an auction.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12325
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
60
July 22, 2024 - 12:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

Bert H. said

Steve,

I have owned that box for 18-years now.  It was not cheap when I bought it from Walt Hallstein, and it is one of only two known complete boxes.

Bert

Bert – do you recall another partial box that came up for sale in more recent years?  I don’t think it was an auction.

I do not, but I haven’t exactly been looking for more of them.  It took me almost 3-years to track down the identical condition & marked singles to fill the box I acquired.  The average cost per cartridge was $90.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bill Hockett, wally, mrcvs, TR, 86Win, Blue Ridge Parson, 308Norma
Guest(s) 144
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6020
Chuck: 5451
steve004: 4916
1873man: 4605
Big Larry: 2491
twobit: 2443
mrcvs: 2076
Maverick: 1850
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14211
Posts: 125929

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2001
Members: 9680
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation