Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 56/57 Research Survey
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
October 10, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
341
July 7, 2024 - 12:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

sir,

I purchased a m57 via Cabelas, 23073 matching bolt; shark fin sight, and Lyman rear peep and the fold down rear site.  The barrel was marked 30 B 217

Questions:  is the front trigger guard screw the only one that should have scrollwork on it?  my other two screws are plain, and should the barrel band be installed so the  pat date info is on the right or left?  and what does the B and the 217 refer to?  thanks. Brian

Avatar
Location: 32000' +
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 2362
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
342
July 7, 2024 - 1:33 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Hi Bryan,

Thanks for your info.  Your rifle was made in late 1930 and matches your “30” barrel date. 

The “B” is an inspector’s stamp.

The 217 is the bore diameter at the lands .217″.

The front trigger guard screw should be plain like the other 2, the scrollwork is not factory.

The barrel band patent date typically came from Winchester installed on the right side but the band is symmetrical and can be installed either way. 

I am assuming it is .22 LR and not .22 Short?

Thanks!

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
October 10, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
343
July 7, 2024 - 6:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Jwa,

thanks, in answer .22LR, also, on the trigger guard at one of the bends there is brass looking metal, so the backside of the trigger guard is blued (i.e., black), the outside what is visible when screwed to the stock, is thining blue but mostly grey/browning metal, but for a 1/8 ” x 3/8″ patch of gold colored metal..thoughts?  thanks…the underside of the barrel has evidenced of cold blue, I used a cotton swab with rubbing alcohol to confirm..

Avatar
Location: 32000' +
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 2362
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
344
July 7, 2024 - 3:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Hi Bryan,

Could it be a brazed repair?  There should be no “gold” color anywhere on the trigger guard.

A picture would help determine what it is.

Best Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 31
Member Since:
October 10, 2021
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
345
July 8, 2024 - 5:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

A while back I provided a M57 .22 LR #20842…I took a look at the underside of the barrel as requested, it is B inspector stamp, 217, triangle and 29 dated . the barrel looked like original bluing however this is a barrel where the exposed topside has the browning patina with 30-40% bluing…I was surprised how nice the bluing; or how black it was; is it normal for the letters to be black or should the roll marks B, 217, and 29 be white/silver?

Also, this barrel has the 3/8″ line on the barrel and a 3/8″ line on the receiver section for alignment like I have seen on M72s….Additionally, the proof marks are offset like one reads about for telescopic winchester…

Do you know if it was common to not center the proofmarks on the topside of the barrel but instead place them laterally just above the wood; to align the barrel on the M57; and stamp an inverted triangle before 29?

Break, in response to my other gun, the takedown screw is the one with the short lines around the circumference of the screwhead..if not normal for the M57.do you know what model used a takedown like I am describing?  I thought perhaps it was different to indicate the takedown screw…the design looks like a winchester screwhead..I just cannot recall what model I have seen it on.

thanks.

Avatar
Inspbuild
Guest
WACA Guest
346
December 31, 2024 - 5:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I recently inherited my Great Grandfathers Model 56

Serial Number 13769 

Plain Factory stock, original condition with normal handling marks. 

Most of the bluing is gone but no pitting or damage to the barrel, bore is in excellent condition, bolt functions as it should. Some light patina on all exposed metal 

22 LR 

 

Restoration is starting today 🙂

Avatar
Location: 32000' +
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 2362
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
347
December 31, 2024 - 6:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Awesome, thanks for the survey info!  Your rifle was made in 1927.

You might want to reconsider the restoration, if it is not heavily pitted or otherwise damaged (drilled and tapped, stock modified, etc.) it is worth more with only 5% original bluing than a re-blued rifle.  Additionally, that wear, rubbing and patina was done by your Great-Grandfather, you will never get that back if you make it “look pretty”.  Just my opinion, I would give it a good cleaning and leave it alone, just like your ancestor did 😉

Best Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Avatar
Inspbuild
Guest
WACA Guest
348
January 2, 2025 - 8:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

JWA said
Awesome, thanks for the survey info!  Your rifle was made in 1927.

You might want to reconsider the restoration, if it is not heavily pitted or otherwise damaged (drilled and tapped, stock modified, etc.) it is worth more with only 5% original bluing than a re-blued rifle.  Additionally, that wear, rubbing and patina was done by your Great-Grandfather, you will never get that back if you make it “look pretty”.  Just my opinion, I would give it a good cleaning and leave it alone, just like your ancestor did 😉

Best Regards,

  

Thank you for the reply. I have a large collection of guns with some historic and cash value. I did restore this one simply because it had been left in a room for many years and the rust was pretty bad. There had been a restoration of the stock in the 1970’s and thins were just too rough and ending attention. I took it down to every part and cleaned all of the internal parts, removed the rust from the exterior barrel, cleaned the barrel and the rifling looks as new. It is now functioning, safe and ready to pass down to the next generation in the family. I may send it in and have it blued but for now it is in the raw state and protected with a museum quality wax. It looks amazing but still has much of the character on the stock and action. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: 88 man, Rick C, Jeremy P, Jim Hammen, orzhez
Guest(s) 148
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5862
Chuck: 5248
steve004: 4855
1873man: 4558
Big Larry: 2471
twobit: 2399
mrcvs: 2042
TR: 1832
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 13941
Posts: 123257

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1957
Members: 9543
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation