December 9, 2002
OfflineChuck said
Anthony, that is a very fine rifle. Neither of my EX rifles are in that condition. If you see a 40 EX I’m interested. I’d settle with an unmolested rifle with above average condition.
I thought that you might enjoy that! I didn’t want to put it up earlier, and hijack you’re thread post. You know that the 40 EX. is a pretty rare bird, with Bert’s excellent survey work, we have so much more information to go by today. We’ll keep an eye out!
TXGunNut said
Anthony-
“Pretty nice” doesn’t quite describe that rifle. Wow! Unfortunately I’m have trouble doing better.
Mike
Mike,
I can understand you’re comment, as we don’t often see an Antique mfg. in 1889, looking like that every day! That Lyman sight, #103 Wind gauge Tang Sight, looks to be a nice addition, as they weren’t available until 1916, according to Stroebel’s book, and available up to 1955. I’m not sure what code is on the back, as I haven’t removed it.
Anthony
March 31, 2009
OfflineAnthony said
Chuck said
Anthony, that is a very fine rifle. Neither of my EX rifles are in that condition. If you see a 40 EX I’m interested. I’d settle with an unmolested rifle with above average condition.
I thought that you might enjoy that! I didn’t want to put it up earlier, and hijack you’re thread post. You know that the 40 EX. is a pretty rare bird, with Bert’s excellent survey work, we have so much more information to go by today. We’ll keep an eye out!
Hijack at your leisure.
I saw a 40 EX for sale in 2024 in Greeley. Not much condition but not molested. He wanted $9000. I really didn’t like the deal. I didn’t pay anywhere near that for either of the EX’s I have.
March 31, 2009
OfflineI shot the 6 rounds today and was able to get the data on my Lab Radar chronograph. All cartridges were loaded with 23 grains of IMR 4198. Case 1 used a .380″ bullet and the other 5 used .379″ bullets.
Bullet weight Filler Speed
1. 212.2 grains, 1/4 of a wad, 1,370 fps
2. 202.82 grains, 1/4 of a wad, 1,341 fps
3. 204.04 grains, 1/4 of a wad, 1,394 fps
4. 212.42 grains, 1/2 of a wad, 1,403 fps
5. 213.72 grains, 1/2 of a wad, 1,394 fps
6. 212.14 grains, 3/4 of a wad, 1,356 fps
All of the cartridges loaded but I had to push them in. All the fired cases ejected but were very tight. Except #4, it stuck and I had to knock it out. So obviously I am getting more pressure than the black powder loads produced.
December 9, 2002
OfflineChuck said
Anthony said
Chuck said
Anthony, that is a very fine rifle. Neither of my EX rifles are in that condition. If you see a 40 EX I’m interested. I’d settle with an unmolested rifle with above average condition.
I thought that you might enjoy that! I didn’t want to put it up earlier, and hijack you’re thread post. You know that the 40 EX. is a pretty rare bird, with Bert’s excellent survey work, we have so much more information to go by today. We’ll keep an eye out!
Hijack at your leisure.
I saw a 40 EX for sale in 2024 in Greeley. Not much condition but not molested. He wanted $9000. I really didn’t like the deal. I didn’t pay anywhere near that for either of the EX’s I have.
I’m appreciative Chuck,
I’m also in agreement, as a 40 EX. would be nice, but not at a King’s ransom!
Anthony
November 7, 2015
OnlineChuck said
CAnthony said
I’m appreciative Chuck,
I’m also in agreement, as a 40 EX. would be nice, but not at a King’s ransom!
Anthony
Anthony, I came home from Vegas with a box of original Win 38 EX ammo, some 405 basic 3 1/4″ cases and a 40 EX rifle. When I can I’ll take some pictures.
Nice scores, Chuck! That should keep you busy for awhile. Looking forward to learning more about them.
Mike
December 9, 2002
OfflineChuck said
CAnthony said
I’m appreciative Chuck,
I’m also in agreement, as a 40 EX. would be nice, but not at a King’s ransom!
Anthony
Anthony, I came home from Vegas with a box of original Win 38 EX ammo, some 405 basic 3 1/4″ cases and a 40 EX rifle. When I can I’ll take some pictures.
TXGunNut said
Chuck said
CAnthony said
I’m appreciative Chuck,
I’m also in agreement, as a 40 EX. would be nice, but not at a King’s ransom!
Anthony
Anthony, I came home from Vegas with a box of original Win 38 EX ammo, some 405 basic 3 1/4″ cases and a 40 EX rifle. When I can I’ll take some pictures.
Nice scores, Chuck! That should keep you busy for awhile. Looking forward to learning more about them.
Mike
Chuck, I’m in agreement with Mike, as a Great score! I saw that you said you picked up a rifle in the Vegas thread Post, but I didn’t know that you found that, from you’re want list! I like the #4 barrel, that the letter shows also! Can’t wait to see pics!
Anthony
March 31, 2009
OfflineHere is the data from yesterdays shots. I dropped the charge 1 grain to 22 grs of 4198. No problems loading, ejecting and no pressure signs.![]()

Next week I’m going to fine tune this load and go up .5 grains and see what happens.
Here is a picture of the 40 EX I bought. The case color is brighter in the picture. It does not letter with the Beach front sight nor the vernier tang sight. I messed around with a case last night. I’m going to have to squeeze these too but not as much. Case isn’t pretty but it goes in.
March 31, 2009
OfflineBert H. said
Have you slugged the bore of that 40 EX yet? I am curious what it actually measures.
Bert
No. I have been so busy. I just can’t catch up. But I did take it apart. Nothing inside except on the barrel there is LL that may be 11’s. I measured the barrel diameter. Muzzle – 1.052″, Receiver end – 1.155″. Denny told me that some of the early #4 barrels were larger?
April 15, 2005
OnlineChuck said
Bert H. said
Have you slugged the bore of that 40 EX yet? I am curious what it actually measures.
Bert
No. I have been so busy. I just can’t catch up. But I did take it apart. Nothing inside except on the barrel there is LL that may be 11’s. I measured the barrel diameter. Muzzle – 1.052″, Receiver end – 1.155″. Denny told me that some of the early #4 barrels were larger?
I do not believe that they were “larger”, just a bit more variance in the size dimensions. In my future reference book, I have the No. 4 barrels with a nominal size as follows: Receiver end – 1.12″ and the Muzzle end – 1.08″. Due to fact that the barrels were draw filed by hand and polished, the physical measurements will vary.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

March 31, 2009
OfflineI loaded 6 rounds today. Loads 1 and 2 are with 22 grains of 4198, 3 and 4 have 22.25 grains and 5 and 6 have 22.5 grains.
The bullets are varying in weight even though they have been sized and cut to the same length.
1 212 grs This bullet is .381″ in diameter because the neck of this piece of brass is thinner. All the rest are .379″. I had to crimp this neck.
2 213 grs
3 214 grs I had to crimp this neck.
4 218 grs
5 214 grs
6 216 grs
The first shot is almost always slower because the barrel is not up to temp.
Less neck tension may cause less pressure if the neck leaks.
Lighter bullets may travel faster.
We’ll see what happens on Tuesday.
March 31, 2009
OfflineThe first 2 were loaded with 22 grains of 4198. 1350 and 1274 fps.
The second 2 had 22.25 grains, 1321 and 1249 fps.
An the last 2 had 22.5 grains, 1352 and 1363 fps.
The 2 with the 22.5 grains caused the ejection to get harder.
So I’m going to use 22.25 grains for now and may adjust as I shoot these some more. The temperature was 74 degrees. I need to test these again when the temp is in the 90’s and in the 60’s. The 50 degree weather into the 60’s I can probably add some powder. But the 90’s I may have to lower the charge.
April 15, 2005
OnlineChuck said
Here is the chrono results.
The first 2 were loaded with 22 grains of 4198. 1350 and 1274 fps.
The second 2 had 22.25 grains, 1321 and 1249 fps.
An the last 2 had 22.5 grains, 1352 and 1363 fps.
The 2 with the 22.5 grains caused the ejection to get harder.
So I’m going to use 22.25 grains for now and may adjust as I shoot these some more. The temperature was 74 degrees. I need to test these again when the temp is in the 90’s and in the 60’s. The 50 degree weather into the 60’s I can probably add some powder. But the 90’s I may have to lower the charge.
Chuck,
You are nowhere near the factory original velocity for the 38 Express, which leads me to believe that you are nowhere near the nominal pressure. What do the primers look like on the cases (pre & post firing) with the sticky extraction (pictures) ?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

March 31, 2009
OfflineBert H. said
Chuck,
You are nowhere near the factory original velocity for the 38 Express, which leads me to believe that you are nowhere near the nominal pressure. What do the primers look like on the cases (pre & post firing) with the sticky extraction (pictures) ?
Bert
The factory velocity is more but it was with black powder. Black powder creates less chamber pressure. I didn’t take pictures of the primers but some were starting to back out. When I have to use a cleaning rod to knock out the brass that is clear sign of over pressure. The documents I have say I should be around 1450 fps with the 4198. But I won’t get that fast without over pressuring this rifle.
April 15, 2005
OnlineChuck said
Bert H. said
Chuck,
You are nowhere near the factory original velocity for the 38 Express, which leads me to believe that you are nowhere near the nominal pressure. What do the primers look like on the cases (pre & post firing) with the sticky extraction (pictures) ?
Bert
The factory velocity is more but it was with black powder. Black powder creates less chamber pressure.
That is not a true statement. Pressure tests have shown that IMR 4198 actually creates less pressure than BP, but it has a longer duration pressure curve.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

Log In
