January 13, 2010
OfflineFew people have ever seen a Browning model 1878 and fewer people own one.
While I was in Cody last July, I found this remarkable Model 1878 and bought it! It is what brought Thomas Bennet out to Ogden, Utah to the Browning Brothers shop to secure the rights to produce the rifle, which would become the Winchester Model 1885.
It is rare enough to find a real Browning Brothers gun, but to also have a heavy barrel, cleaning rod and double set triggers, this one really stands alone!
It is marked 40-70 which shoulf probably be 40-70 Sharps Staight, but through trial and error, I found that it is chambered 40-90 Sharps Bottleneck.
I took it to the range and with some .408 265 grain greese grooved gas checked bullets, I was able to get this group with open sights at 50 yards.
It will be killing something thiss fall…





December 9, 2002
OfflineKirk,
That’s a very nice find. Not all of the Single Shots had the Browning Brothers identification on them, even though they made and used more than one stamp, with different variations on them. These rifles we’re made by hand as was the tooling to do so.
The, what looks like an,”O”, stamp on the left sided flat, under the patent date, is interesting to me. As is also, what looks like, “530”,(serial #530) on the top flat in front of the receiver. We aren’t accustomed to seeing the serial number here! The amount of bluing on the barrel, is also pretty amazing to see.
As we know there’s not a lot of information out there on these, as one of the only 600 manufactured original S. S. rifles. The Borchardt style lever, and as you mentioned, the “double set”, triggers, and the cleaning rod underneath, are sure scarce.
This example has a larger metal style crescent butt, for the times when shooters we’re smaller in stature.
The “Thick Side ” round top receiver, is always a very attractive looking feature to me on these.
It was a very well known fact back in the day, that a heavy barrel rifle shot better! Hence the heavy barrel. It was not uncommon for these to weigh 16 pounds or more.
It’s well known and documented in Campbell’s books that the wrist area was changed by Winchester with the degree of the wood to metal fit, bu changing the angle on the metal receiver, and also strengthening the, “S”, shaped style point of contact. Amongst other changes that Winchester made to the M-1885 S.S.
It’s not well known what rear sights we’re used on these, as the “Fruend”, sight was also used on some of these and are characteristically longer than what most of us are accustomed to, as far as the Winchester rear rifle sights the we see.
With less than 100 known to exist, approximately 60 are documented today to be in existence, or at least found.
Thanks for sharing,
Tony
December 9, 2002
Offlineantler1 said
What years were Browning brothers stamping any model of Winchester that were sold thru their shop?
I don’t think there’s much in print answering you’re question, but we do know in reading several accounts on the dealings of JMB, and Winchester, that upon purchasing the patent for the first of JMB’s, 127 patents, he would take Winchesters on trade for partial payment, as early as the very first patent date of Oct. 7, 1879, and through out the late 1800’s and into the early 1900’s we see some of the “Browning Brothers stamp’s” that we’re offered in a few different variants, on different Winchester models, that a few members here have shared.
Tony
November 7, 2015
OfflineLooking at that stamp I wonder if it passed through the Browning Brothers’ shop more than once. Very nice rifle, shoots great for nearly 150 years old!
Mike
May 23, 2009
OfflineShrapnel said
It is what brought Thomas Bennet out to Ogden, Utah to the Browning Brothers shop to secure the rights to produce the rifle, which would become the Winchester Model 1885.
Technically what brought out V.P. T.G. Bennet to Utah was to settle a dispute over a Reloading Tool patent infringement over (W..R.A.Co.) Superintendent V.A. King’s 1880 Reloading Tool and Browning’s Reloading Tool. They settled on an agreement to allow Browning Brothers to finish producing 125 Sets of Tools that Browning had on hand. While settling this agreement over the reloading tool another deal was struck between Winchester & Browning over the Single Shot and other designs. That lead to a long term relationship with Browning and Winchester until the final falling out between them.
Sincerely,
Maverick
![]()
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
May 23, 2009
OfflineTXGunNut said
Looking at that stamp I wonder if it passed through the Browning Brothers’ shop more than once. Very nice rifle, shoots great for nearly 150 years old!
Mike
I wouldn’t necessarily say “It passed through”, but rather having been actually “made at” the Browning Shop in Utah makes it even more special than any Winchester with a Browning Bros. stamp. It was hand made by one or more of the Browning Brothers.
![]()
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
April 15, 2005
OnlineAnthony said
Kirk,
That’s a very nice find. Not all of the Single Shots had the Browning Brothers identification on them, even though they made and used more than one stamp, with different variations on them. These rifles we’re made by hand as was the tooling to do so.
The, what looks like an,”O”, stamp on the left sided flat, under the patent date, is interesting to me. As is also, what looks like, “530”,(serial #530) on the top flat in front of the receiver. We aren’t accustomed to seeing the serial number here! The amount of bluing on the barrel, is also pretty amazing to see.
As we know there’s not a lot of information out there on these, as one of the only 600 manufactured original S. S. rifles. The Borchardt style lever, and as you mentioned, the “double set”, triggers, and the cleaning rod underneath, are sure scarce.
This example has a larger metal style crescent butt, for the times when shooters we’re smaller in stature.
The “Thick Side ” round top receiver, is always a very attractive looking feature to me on these.
It was a very well known fact back in the day, that a heavy barrel rifle shot better! Hence the heavy barrel. It was not uncommon for these to weigh 16 pounds or more.
It’s well known and documented in Campbell’s books that the wrist area was changed by Winchester with the degree of the wood to metal fit, bu changing the angle on the metal receiver, and also strengthening the, “S”, shaped style point of contact. Amongst other changes that Winchester made to the M-1885 S.S.
It’s not well known what rear sights we’re used on these, as the “Fruend”, sight was also used on some of these and are characteristically longer than what most of us are accustomed to, as far as the Winchester rear rifle sights the we see.
With less than 100 known to exist, approximately 60 are documented today to be in existence, or at least found.
Thanks for sharing,
Tony
Tony,
I have personally seen and handled 25+ original Browning Single Shot rifles, and all of them were marked with the Browning Brothers marking (not always in the same location or the exact same marking). Further, all of them had a serial number, but again, not stamped in the exact same location. About 15-years ago there was a display of (11) Browning Single Shot rifles at the annual WACA show in Cody.
I have photos in my research files for 20 of the Browning rifles, lowest serial number is 88 and the highest is 536.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

April 15, 2005
OnlineTXGunNut said
Looking at that stamp I wonder if it passed through the Browning Brothers’ shop more than once.
Mike
Doubtful. The stamped markings on it are correct for a late 1882 or early 1883 Browning Single Shot rifle. The markings on it are identical to those on serial number 536.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

December 9, 2002
OfflineBert,
I am in full agreement in all that you’re saying, and like the points that you made. With you’re research on the M-1885, I am sure that you have come across more information than many of us if not all on the Browning Brothers invention of the S.S. rifle.
I do remember mention of a Browning Brothers S.S. rifle display at Cody years ago, or at least read about it. I don’t remember who set up the display or who had it.
This one is serial number #196, and not marked anywhere with the Browning Brothers stamp, of any example. .50 Caliber, 30 inch, Oct. barrel, that measured 1 3/16 across the muzzle. Well used as many were.
Tony
December 9, 2002
OfflineThis is a picture of Browning’s S.S. rifle #196, that is seen on the Browning Historic Timeline page.
https://www.browning.com/support/historic-timeline.html
Tony
June 12, 2013
OfflineBert H. said
antler1 said
What years were Browning brothers stamping any model of Winchester that were sold thru their shop?
Late 1885 through at least 1906.
Bert
This is one of the reasons I asked. It seems late in production to have a legit Browning Bros stamp.
https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/4098/26/browning-bros-marked-winchester-model-1894-rifle
December 9, 2002
Offlineantler1 said
Bert H. said
antler1 said
What years were Browning brothers stamping any model of Winchester that were sold thru their shop?
Late 1885 through at least 1906.
Bert
This is one of the reasons I asked. It seems late in production to have a legit Browning Bros stamp.
https://www.rockislandauction.com/detail/4098/26/browning-bros-marked-winchester-model-1894-rifle
The rifle in question that you mention being mfg. in 1907, is very close to the end that Bert has mentioned. (1885-1906) Here’s a picture of the stamps that have been found in regards to the Browning Brothers stamp variants, from Madis Book. I tried to use the smallest image and the least bytes but it still turned sideways. Anyway the 5 th stamp down from the top looks like the one on the 1907 mfg. M-1894.
I’m not saying that the stamp is original or it’s correct, as there’s not a lot of printed material or information on these as far as I know. Bert can possibly add more. We have to remember that these we’re applied by hand and maybe individually, as the beginning of the Browning stamp is double struck and hard to read. I’m not sure if stamps are in the Browning museum in Ogden, that could be verified as I’ve never been there.
My guess is this could be correct. Just a guess!

Tony
March 31, 2009
OfflineBert H. said
About 15-years ago there was a display of (11) Browning Single Shot rifles at the annual WACA show in Cody.
I have photos in my research files for 20 of the Browning rifles, lowest serial number is 88 and the highest is 536.
Bert
In 1997 when the Cody show was in the gymnasium there was a display of the Browning single shots. Most I’ve ever seen in one place.
Bert, do you know how many were made? I have seen a document that says no more than 600?
April 15, 2005
OnlineAnthony said
This is a picture of Browning’s S.S. rifle #196, that is seen on the Browning Historic Timeline page.
https://www.browning.com/support/historic-timeline.html
Tony
Are there any additional pictures of #196? The link you provided has just the single picture.
These are the markings on S/N 135. Note that both the Breech Block and the barrel have the Browning stamped marking;

This is S/N 212


Both of these rifles were chambered for the 45-70 Government
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

April 15, 2005
OnlineChuck said
Bert H. said
About 15-years ago there was a display of (11) Browning Single Shot rifles at the annual WACA show in Cody.
I have photos in my research files for 20 of the Browning rifles, lowest serial number is 88 and the highest is 536.
Bert
In 1997 when the Cody show was in the gymnasium there was a display of the Browning single shots. Most I’ve ever seen in one place.
Bert, do you know how many were made? I have seen a document that says no more than 600?
To the best of my knowledge, none have been verified with a serial number greater than 536. I suspect that the total number that were made was something very close to 550.
That display in 1997 was the same collector that set up his display at the Cody show just a few years later. I spent more than 4-hours at the WACA show display talking to the fellow. Unfortunately, I believe that he has since passed away.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

1 Guest(s)
Log In

