Bert,
If I’m correct, we can assume the following.
It is a Benet inside-primed cartridge head stamped C 11 F 80. The ‘C’ identifies this as a carbine cartridge. The ’11 80′ indicates the month and year it was made, this one being November 1880. The ‘F’ indicates that the cartridge was made at the Frankford Arsenal.
The only thing throwing me is the bullet diameter and case length. To small to be 45 Gov., and so I’m assuming a .40-41 caliber cartridge offered pre-1880?
Hope that helps. Here is a couple of websites that have supporting information, but doesn’t nail down this exact specific cartridge.
https://www.cartridgecollector.net/45-70-government
https://www.oldammo.com/november04.htm
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Herschel Logan’s book doesn’t include Bert’s .38 but it does illustrate a gov’t produced .40, which shows the Ordnance Dept was experimenting with calibers smaller than .45. He goes on to say that many other experimental cartridges were developed during this time, so, since it has the FA headstamp, it stands to reason this must be one of them.
Bert H. said
I am not aware of a rim fire 45-70 cartridge. To the best of my knowledge, it has always been a center fire cartridge.Your cartridge is very similar to the one I have (minus the large heavy bullet).
Bert
This is not a rim fire. It has an internal primer. Frankford Arsenal used these until around 1882. They then loaded them with boxer primers. I have been looking for these in 45-70 carbine to put in my Mills belt to display with my 2nd model Hotchkiss military carbine. The carbines are actually 45-55s.
I will ask my military collector friend about your cartridge. Isn’t a 45-70 case 2.1″?
Chuck said
This is not a rim fire. It has an internal primer. Frankford Arsenal used these until around 1882. They then loaded them with boxer primers. I have been looking for these in 45-70 carbine to put in my Mills belt to display with my 2nd model Hotchkiss military carbine. The carbines are actually 45-55s.
There were several different inside-primed designs produced by FA, which is strange considering that Benet had designed an outside-primed reloadable case in 1866, preceeding his inside-primed design of 1868. Maybe the inside-primed cases were cheaper to mfg.?
Bert and others, I first learned of inside primed .45 Gov’t cartridges in 1973. I was still a bachelor, and sometimes bored of watching the walls in the BOQ. I heard there was an area on the west side of Ft. Huachuca, AZ, where you could find old cartridge cases. Apparently the area was used by the old cavalry units to have practice skirmishes, as the ground was littered with .45 Gov’t BLANK cartridge cases, plus a few odd multi pistol caliber application blanks with a significant necked down area. Those were marked .45 WEB if I recall. I found one blank that had not been used, but the paper wad had deteriorated and let the original black powder fall out as I picked it up. I kept most of those I picked up–and one is an inside primed case. I was able to see the inside disk that is perforated in several locations about the rim, and it is crimped into the case as the example Bert is showing. I am only guessing here, but I suspect in the early days it was easier to fill the head with priming, then insert and crimp in the anvil as a disk. For Bert only–another topic we can discuss at Cody IF EITHER of us remember! Tim
Well, the .386 Bullet Dia matches the .41 Long Colt, but the case length is too long. So that’s why I’d imagine it is for a .40-.41 caliber cartridge.
Maybe a 40-50 S.S. or a 40-70 S.S. type cartridge but even those don’t match up with the rest of the description. Rest assured its from a cartridge that was developed prior to November 1880.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
One thing to remember is that Frankford Arsenal only loaded ammunition for the Military (Springfield Armory) . I called my friend. He says the only way to get an accurate measurement of the bullet diameter is to pull the bullet. In his opinion this is a 45-55 cartridge. He is not aware of any experimental cartridges. All you are seeing is the curvature of the bullet after the crimp groove.
OK, I can see and understand that it is an inside primed cartridge. However, I do not believe that it is a Frankford Arsenal (FA) manufactured cartridge. Unlike the one that Stefan posted a picture of, the cartridge I have is stamped “C 80 F 11”.
I remeasured the bullet diameter at the case mount and found that it is actually .433.
I then compared it too an original W.R.A.Co. 45-70 405 cartridge, and other than primer style, the two cartridges are nearly identical in all dimensional measurements. Accordingly, I now believe that it is an inside primed 45-70 cartridge manufactured in November, 1880. The only mystery is who was “C A” ?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
clarence said
“C” for carbine (55 g.), but where are you getting the “A.”
Sorry, I meant to type “F”
I found this while researching and it is exactly what I have… 4iQ8BSg.jpg (2414×3490) (imgur.com)
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
clarence said
Chuck said
He is not aware of any experimental cartridges.If he doesn’t know THAT (which is well known & indisputable), I’d seriously question his authority as an ammo expert.
Picky picky. There was no Frankford Arsenal ammo made with this headstamp other than the 45-55. If you could ever meet him you would be in awe of his military knowledge. He has a photographic memory and has been collecting since the 60’s. He has authored and co authored a few books. His name is Craigh Riesch.
Bert,
I think there’s your answer and you’ve solved the mystery. All the cartridge collectors I talk with read the head stamp “Counter-Clockwise”, but it really doesn’t matter, making it C 11 F 80. Therefore a C=Carbine 11=November F=Frankford Arsenal 80=1880. So it being identical to a 45-70 cartridge make sense and it being for the Carbine means it would have the 55 grains powder loading.
Which is what I thought initially, but was thrown by the .386 bullet dia.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Here’s a similar cartridge at Ward’s Auction:
https://www.wardscollectibles.com/viewitem.php?item=5043
Don
deerhunter said
Here’s a similar cartridge at Ward’s Auction:https://www.wardscollectibles.com/viewitem.php?item=5043
Don
This cartridge is not the same as what we have been talking about. It is much rarer due to the RAISED head stamp.
Chuck said
This is not a rim fire. It has an internal primer. Frankford Arsenal used these until around 1882. They then loaded them with boxer primers. I have been looking for these in 45-70 carbine to put in my Mills belt to display with my 2nd model Hotchkiss military carbine. The carbines are actually 45-55s.
I will ask my military collector friend about your cartridge. Isn’t a 45-70 case 2.1″?
You are absolutely right.
I have two boxes of .45 Colt from Frankfort Arsenal from 1880 whose cartridges also have the inside priming.
Stefan
steff said
You are absolutely right.
I have two boxes of .45 Colt from Frankfort Arsenal from 1880 whose cartridges also have the inside priming.
Stefan
Frankford Arsenal just like the 45-70’s the 45 Colt used the Benet primers until 1882/3 when they started using boxer primers.
Very cool box. I have a US Calvary Colt that these would go nicely with. I have a sealed box dated December 1873.
1 Guest(s)
