
November 1, 2013

steve004 said I sometimes forget to look at the date of the posts. This explains why I couldn’t find the listing!
I think there should be an expiration date on responding to (but not reading) such old posts. If there’s some statement you wish to discuss, cut & paste it into a new post of your own creation to make it obvious that it’s not current.

May 23, 2009

steve004 said
wallyb said
Hi,
The Winchester that I was referring to is an 1886 Carbine in 50 ex. GI 100720670
Walter
Is it still listed? I couldn’t find it.
That isn’t but the other link still works for me. https://www.gunsinternational.com/guns-for-sale-online/rifles/winchester-rifles-model-1886/antique-winchester-1886-take-down-in-50-express.cfm?gun_id=100721372
Which was the one I was responding to in my most recent post.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/

May 23, 2009

clarence said
steve004 said I sometimes forget to look at the date of the posts. This explains why I couldn’t find the listing!
I think there should be an expiration date on responding to (but not reading) such old posts. If there’s some statement you wish to discuss, cut & paste it into a new post of your own creation to make it obvious that it’s not current.
I personally don’t see the issue with updating an old post, especially if it has merit to discussing it. Otherwise why keep any old posts at all?
I’ve got a post that was started in 2015 that still gets updated fairly regularly and am most appreciated that it does.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/

November 19, 2006

Maverick said
clarence said
steve004 said I sometimes forget to look at the date of the posts. This explains why I couldn’t find the listing!
I think there should be an expiration date on responding to (but not reading) such old posts. If there’s some statement you wish to discuss, cut & paste it into a new post of your own creation to make it obvious that it’s not current.
I personally don’t see the issue with updating an old post, especially if it has merit to discussing it. Otherwise why keep any old posts at all?
I’ve got a post that was started in 2015 that still gets updated fairly regularly and am most appreciated that it does.
Sincerely,
Maverick
I’m ok with the old posts reappearing. I just need to beef up my mental alertness

November 19, 2006

cj57 said
Here’s the link Winchester Model 1886 Saddle Ring Carbine SRC in 50/110 with Factory Letter (gunsinternational.com)
It does letter as a .50 carbine and it is antique production. Those are the positives. I also note that he does not state the case color finish is original.

November 9, 2008

steve004 said
cj57 said
Here’s the link Winchester Model 1886 Saddle Ring Carbine SRC in 50/110 with Factory Letter (gunsinternational.com)
It does letter as a .50 carbine and it is antique production. Those are the positives. I also note that he does not state the case color finish is original.
It’s a very nice carbine, most seen very hard use! and put to bed wet. Look at the wood at tangs, tight and sharp, used little and stored improper, getting oxidation. I would be happy to give it a home!

November 19, 2006

cj57 said
steve004 said
cj57 said
Here’s the link Winchester Model 1886 Saddle Ring Carbine SRC in 50/110 with Factory Letter (gunsinternational.com)
It does letter as a .50 carbine and it is antique production. Those are the positives. I also note that he does not state the case color finish is original.
It’s a very nice carbine, most seen very hard use! and put to bed wet. Look at the wood at tangs, tight and sharp, used little and stored improper, getting oxidation. I would be happy to give it a home!
The fine pitting on the barrel and the top of the bolt certainly supports the improper storage idea.
1 Guest(s)
