I am probably just re hashing an old topic here, but I am curious what some of you guys think. If there were 2 rifles for sale, same model but one is very well preserved and is in a state of high condition, ie lots of bright case color, deep rich original blue and just basically unmolested. Second one is original but condition has faded considerably,ie blue has faded to silver, high edge wear, wood has been sanded/cleaned/ reoiled, but has really unique special order features some of which are seldom found. So, now they are priced the same, which one to buy? Oh, and one more thing, neither one is represented in your collection.
I suspect most would choose the high condition rifle. There’s probably a reason collectors say, “condition, condition, condition” rather than, “special order features, special order features, special order features.”
For me, the answer would be in the details of the special order rifle. Not all special order features are equal. For example, DST’s on a carbine is going to pull me in more than the same feature on a rifle. The precise condition details would be important for me. You listed both re-oiled and sanded wood. Those are two dramatically different alterations for me. For example, a piece that has sanded wood, particularly such that it is below the metal – I will run from a piece like that.
November 7, 2015
Plans for the acquired rifle would have an effect on that decision. If plans include eventual resale condition will improve the odds of resale for a good price in a timely manner. Some collectors are not interested in a non-original specimen at any price, that often includes sanded wood. I classify cleaning and oiling of a well-used stock as necessary maintenance in most cases. I like unusual specimens but have learned that Winchesters with non-standard or alternative standard features are actually almost common. Guns I used to think were “special order” were actually regular production items. While I enjoy “special order” guns as a reminder of a bygone manufacturing era in this situation I would choose condition over features.
Mike
I have always thought and heard that condition is rare but also you need to know what features they have since some features make a worn gun worth more than a mint plain gun. Case in point a mint 73 in 44 compared to a worn 1 of 1000.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
Thanks to all who have responded to this. So many well regarded folks. I guess this is were a collector has to dig deep and figure out what he wants. I am not in this to simply turn around and resell my guns, I’m building this collection for my sons and grandsons and want some good things for them. Guess the easy answer is buy both but not an option at this point. Thanks to all again.
oldcrankyyankee said
I am probably just re hashing an old topic here, but I am curious what some of you guys think. If there were 2 rifles for sale, same model but one is very well preserved and is in a state of high condition, ie lots of bright case color, deep rich original blue and just basically unmolested. Second one is original but condition has faded considerably,ie blue has faded to silver, high edge wear, wood has been sanded/cleaned/ reoiled, but has really unique special order features some of which are seldom found. So, now they are priced the same, which one to buy? Oh, and one more thing, neither one is represented in your collection.
If the feature is rare, rare like 36″ barrel, extra hvy, or history I give up condition. I agree condition is rare, especially on carbines and guns made in the 1870’s so for me, no rules. I’m an impulse buyer, I don’t even know what I want until I see it. T/R
TR said
If the feature is rare, rare like 36″ barrel, extra hvy, or history I give up condition. I agree condition is rare, especially on carbines and guns made in the 1870’s so for me, no rules. I’m an impulse buyer, I don’t even know what I want until I see it. T/R
I am so very familiar with this.
oldcrankyyankee said
Lmao TR, so true about impulse, just mine sometimes over rides my bank account! Serious question tho, what came first checkered barrel matting or wavy matte. it pertains to one of these guns I’m looking at
I am a matted barrel fan so hopefully we get some feedback from someone knowledgeable on this. I had always been under the impression checkered and wavy were the only styles. However, on a Forum post at some point I believe someone said there was a 3rd style. It would be interesting to know history and which style came first. No doubt it is a rare feature – for the Model 1886, John Madl research only found 206 (all calibers) with the barrel matting.
Well Mr. Humphrey in my short time here on earth Ive only seen two types, checkered and wavy, and as such only seen three of each. Thats what is making this question come up as the ” special feature” gun is so intriguing. But I would love to hear if there was another style, and still would like to know the dates the different ones were produced.
I’ll chime in here, as I’ve thought about this a lot. It took decades of buying and selling for me to realize what kind of collector I am. Personally, I’ll choose special configurations over condition every time. Every gun in my collection, no matter how expensive, is getting shot/used at some point in its life. I love loading for these guns and keeping them active! Therefore the pristine “condition” gun would really be a bad investment for me. I would shoot it and use it. Therefore, its the rare config, but honest Winchester that really gets me going. However, the caveat is that the gun has to letter perfectly with all of the features. I won’t touch a gun that won’t letter.
velosa said
I’ll chime in here, as I’ve thought about this a lot. It took decades of buying and selling for me to realize what kind of collector I am. Personally, I’ll choose special configurations over condition every time. Every gun in my collection, no matter how expensive, is getting shot/used at some point in its life. I love loading for these guns and keeping them active! Therefore the pristine “condition” gun would really be a bad investment for me. I would shoot it and use it. Therefore, its the rare config, but honest Winchester that really gets me going. However, the caveat is that the gun has to letter perfectly with all of the features. I won’t touch a gun that won’t letter.
It’s interesting to hear the different perspectives. Does your above statement mean you won’t own a gun that is outside the letterable range?
That’s hundreds of thousands 94’s being passed over(Post 1906) because of no letter, and the majority of carbines that letter only tell you the calibre.
If it’s a high value rifle with special order features I want a letter, otherwise no letter is fine for me on standard guns that look right & no suspicions. Jmo
Rick C
oldcrankyyankee said
Well Mr. Humphrey in my short time here on earth Ive only seen two types, checkered and wavy, and as such only seen three of each. Thats what is making this question come up as the ” special feature” gun is so intriguing. But I would love to hear if there was another style, and still would like to know the dates the different ones were produced.
I did a quick search of 73’s with matt barrels and found one second model with wavy lines and the later ones are checkered but I see several variations in the checkering from lines per inch variations to pattern variations. Out of about 19,300 guns in my survey only 27 matt barrels.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's
Email: [email protected]
January 26, 2011
TR said
I really like matted barrels, they are rare. Unfortunately I have never owned one or handled enough to know types and time periods. If someone does, I’m all ears. T/R
Tom
Here are the three styles I’m aware of and have observed. Possibly in the order they were available …….. but can’t say for sure. Just my observations.
Square Cut
Diagonal Cut
Wavy Cut
~Gary~
1 Guest(s)