Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Model 1885 low wall vs high wall
Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2194
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
1
December 6, 2020 - 2:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

My understanding is that Winchester did not really differentiate between low wall vs high wall receivers with regards to the customer.  It stands to reason that a .22 cal Winchester Model 1885 would be a low wall and a .50 cal Winchester Model 1885 would be a high wall, but what about everything in between?  I seem to recall a .38-56 that was posted to this forum as having recently sold and it might have been one of a kind, as maybe the only .38-56 on a low wall frame.  I own a .38-40 and that’s a low wall frame but is .401 diameter.  Granted, a shorter case…

So what determines what should be a high wall and what should be a low wall based on calibre and a great achievement might be to collect a compilation of Winchester Model 1885 rifles that were built on the frame not typical of the calibre, such as the .38-56 on a low wall frame.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12869
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 6, 2020 - 2:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Winchester stated that the low-wall frame would be used for the rim fire and pistol sized cartridges, and for the most part, that is what they did.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 6, 2020 - 3:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said
Winchester stated that the low-wall frame would be used for the rim fire and pistol sized cartridges, and for the most part, that is what they did.  

Yes, but where was that stated?  It was not in the regular catalogs or advertising, or they would have had to give separate names to the two different receivers, which they never did.

And there were quite a few exceptions to the usual procedure, such as the .22RF High Wall I once had–a pain to load, with no advantage to the unneeded sidewalls.  An order for a .22RF with CC or DS triggers would have to be made on a HW action, as those trigger plates wouldn’t fit a LW action.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12869
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 6, 2020 - 4:30 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

clarence said

Yes, but where was that stated?  It was not in the regular catalogs or advertising, or they would have had to give separate names to the two different receivers, which they never did.

And there were quite a few exceptions to the usual procedure, such as the .22RF High Wall I once had–a pain to load, with no advantage to the unneeded sidewalls.  An order for a .22RF with CC or DS triggers would have to be made on a HW action, as those trigger plates wouldn’t fit a LW action.  

Actually, it was in their early catalogs. I will look through several and scan a copy of it when I find it.  In regards to the exceptions, as I stated, “for the most part”.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
5
December 6, 2020 - 11:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I recently looked at a high wall SINGLE SHOT 25-20 DOM 1909. The owner had described it as rare due to its caliber with a high wall configuration. It would be interesting to know what Winchester was thinking but I have to surmise what the customer wanted, the customer got.

RickC

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2194
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
6
December 6, 2020 - 2:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Did it have a letter confirming the original calibre configuration?  To prove the barrel wasn’t changed.

I would think it would be a rare customer, if at all, who would even care if it was a low wall vs a high wall.  That was internal to the factory, I should think.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
7
December 6, 2020 - 2:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

mrcvs said
Did it have a letter confirming the original calibre configuration?  To prove the barrel wasn’t changed.

I would think it would be a rare customer, if at all, who would even care if it was a low wall vs a high wall.  That was internal to the factory, I should think.  

Sure did.B37701A3-38A6-48B2-BFFB-E2D46A13C7D2.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2194
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
December 6, 2020 - 2:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

What were they asking for it and did you buy it?

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
9
December 6, 2020 - 2:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

Just showing it as it fit this topic.

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2194
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
10
December 6, 2020 - 2:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The serial number was applied in 1909 and it did not ship until 1916.  The Model 1885 was discontinued in 1920, and by then, it was fairly unpopular, and the .25-20 was not a particularly desirable calibre, either, so it might have been simply a means of fitting a barrel and receiver together, independent of the configuration, just to use up stock.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
11
December 6, 2020 - 3:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

mrcvs said
The serial number was applied in 1909 and it did not ship until 1916.  The Model 1885 was discontinued in 1920, and by then, it was fairly unpopular, and the .25-20 was not a particularly desirable calibre, either, so it might have been simply a means of fitting a barrel and receiver together, independent of the configuration, just to use up stock.  

Ya it could’ve been. Like I said previous, it would be nice to know what Winchester or the production team was thinking or would allow. JWA might have internal memos in his files on some of this stuff.

Avatar
JWA
Location: 32000' +
Admin
Forum Posts: 2566
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
December 6, 2020 - 3:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RickC said

Ya it could’ve been. Like I said previous, it would be nice to know what Winchester or the production team was thinking or would allow. JWA might have internal memos in his files on some of this stuff.  

I defer to Bert on the Single Shot (1885) rifles, he has way more info in his files regarding that model than I do.  I have some drawings and Change of Manufacturing notices and sight info for the Single Shot but nothing that relates to this specific topic.

Best Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
December 6, 2020 - 3:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

mrcvs said
The Model 1885 was discontinued in 1920, and by then, it was fairly unpopular, and the .25-20 was not a particularly desirable calibre, either, so it might have been simply a means of fitting a barrel and receiver together, independent of the configuration, just to use up stock.  

Can’t read letter.  If it has a #3 wt. brl., it would have to have a HW rcvr., because it would need the large brl. shank.  I have one in .32 WCF with a #3 brl.  (Sure helps to tame the heavy recoil of a .32!)  LOTS of them were produced in .25-20 SS, if that’s what it is.  If it’s .25 WCF, that’s very unusual.

 “Model 1885”?  It was simply the Winchester Single Shot. 

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
December 6, 2020 - 3:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RickC said

 Like I said previous, it would be nice to know what Winchester or the production team was thinking or would allow.

They would “allow” anything a customer would pay for, if it was technically feasible to mfg. 

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
15
December 6, 2020 - 4:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

clarence said

Can’t read letter.  If it has a #3 wt. brl., it would have to have a HW rcvr., because it would need the large brl. shank.  I have one in .32 WCF with a #3 brl.  (Sure helps to tame the heavy recoil of a .32!)  LOTS of them were produced in .25-20 SS, if that’s what it is.  If it’s .25 WCF, that’s very unusual.

 “Model 1885”?  It was simply the Winchester Single Shot.   

25-20
#3 oct barrel

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
December 6, 2020 - 4:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RickC said

25-20
#3 oct barrel  

That accounts for the HW rcvr, but which .25-20?

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
17
December 6, 2020 - 4:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

clarence said

That accounts for the HW rcvr, but which .25-20?  

8166BE05-07BD-4178-ACC0-0640D85344CC.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
December 6, 2020 - 4:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

RickC said

8166BE05-07BD-4178-ACC0-0640D85344CC.jpegImage Enlarger  

Rick,  neither attachment will open.  What does the letter SAY the cartridge is?

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
19
December 6, 2020 - 4:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Ok sorry Clarence not sure why. The barrel is stamped 25-20 SS.

E79F98A1-AC0E-47D1-AE7F-C652855ACB5C.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
RickC
Guest
Guests
20
December 6, 2020 - 5:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

clarence said

Can’t read letter.  If it has a #3 wt. brl., it would have to have a HW rcvr., because it would need the large brl. shank.  I have one in .32 WCF with a #3 brl.  (Sure helps to tame the heavy recoil of a .32!)  LOTS of them were produced in .25-20 SS, if that’s what it is.  If it’s .25 WCF, that’s very unusual.

 “Model 1885”?  It was simply the Winchester Single Shot.   

Bert may have some numbers on how many were in 25-20 SS.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: mrcvs, 426crown, bhutch, rogertherelic, John D., Ben, Bill Yadlosky
Guest(s) 109
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6408
Chuck: 5810
steve004: 5173
1873man: 4698
deerhunter: 2694
Big Larry: 2549
twobit: 2493
mrcvs: 2194
Maverick: 2029
Newest Members:
ross
Model94-2025
R.E. Moore
sjGUESTEST
WindsurfAruba
cedar swamp savage
tradecraft
Weida78
Alby
Lambeau
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14716
Posts: 131643

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9982
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation