July 19, 2013
OfflineI have a non-collector friend has put a deposit on this gun. I could help him avoid a big mistake if anyone can comment on any non-original options. Seller says Pauline Muerel confirms Ulrich engraving. Long time high end seller.
Any quick help appreciated or price comments. PM me if that is a better way.
Bill
November 7, 2015
OfflineJust a question from the peanut gallery here: why does an offering in this class not have a letter?
November 7, 2015
OfflineI’d certainly make a call to find out. Date on the monogram is the year following build date. Seems like seller is trying to imply factory engraving when that may not be the case. Not sure how much that matters but I’d guess it was returned for engraving and other modifications but a letter would be a first step in figuring that out.
May 2, 2009
OfflineI wouldn’t even consider buying it unless I had checked how it lettered and saw the letter that Pauline would of wrote with her opinion. I would want to see if she said it was Ulrich that did the work. Even then the gun has a lot of condition issues.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's

Email: [email protected]
November 7, 2015
OfflineRed Book/PRB date appears to be late 1885. I wonder how they determined the work was done by John Ulrich. From what I’ve read all the engravers could copy the others’ styles, much like some of the “old masters’ ” paintings were actually done by students in the masters’ styles. Seems a screw or two have been replaced. Looks like the spring for the elevator is a bit tired or something else is amiss internally. Not sure how 22 short qualifies as “rare” but I guess all things are relative.
November 7, 2015
OfflineTR said
The finish of the various parts, stock, barrel, tube, and receiver, does not look original. First step is letter the gun, but even if it letters, a gun like that is easy to buy but will be a hard to sell. T/R
That bothered me as well, some parts of the receiver show considerable wear while the barrel and mag tube look nearly new. Other parts appear to be somewhere in between.
May 2, 2009
OfflineIt has the wrong stock on it as well. The butt plate use to be a swiss butt but they cut the ends off.
Bob
WACA Life Member--- NRA Life Member---- Cody Firearms member since 1991 Researching the Winchester 1873's

Email: [email protected]
November 19, 2006
OfflineMy impression is that it is not real. I’m willing to be wrong, but I’d have to be proven wrong. I would not be willing to go with someone else’s impression to change my mind.
Also, your friend is a, “non-collector”? I’m just trying to figure out what a non-collector would be doing buying this rifle? Surely not for speculation purposes?
April 15, 2005
OfflineBill,
As others have stated… get the Cody letter. While I trust Pauline’s assessment of who engraved it, that rifle should already have a Factory letter with it.
In my opinion, the asking price is too high for the condition of the rifle.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

December 1, 2012
OfflineFor $ 25K I would expect the seller to have better pictures – at least some taken by a $220 camera. For that price there should be a Cody letter. Also the wood definitely seems to have been refinished and sanded down, at the upper tang and at top of the front edge of the forearm. The carrier also doesn’t look right.
![]()
"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
June 4, 2017
OfflineWincacher said
For $ 25K I would expect the seller to have better pictures – at least some taken by a $220 camera. For that price there should be a Cody letter. Also the wood definitely seems to have been refinished and sanded down, asd the upper tang and at top of the front edge of the forearm. The carrier also doesn’t look right.
Great point, you hit the nail on the head. Pictures of the butt plate, barrel address, barrel caliber stamp, and upper tang markings would answer a lot of questions. T/R
July 19, 2013
OfflineBert H. said
Bill,
As others have stated… get the Cody letter. While I trust Pauline’s assessment of who engraved it, that rifle should already have a Factory letter with it.
In my opinion, the asking price is too high for the condition of the rifle.
Bert
Bert H. said
Bill,
As others have stated… get the Cody letter. While I trust Pauline’s assessment of who engraved it, that rifle should already have a Factory letter with it.
In my opinion, the asking price is too high for the condition of the rifle.
Bert
One of the most elaborately engraved Winchesters you will ever see” ~ Pauline Muerrel
I notice the seller quotes Pauline saying the above….not verifying it as Ulrich.
you guys are great…..i’m Thankful for you all to help me help a friend. At best, this gun is a “ work of art” not the real thing. Bill
November 7, 2015
OfflineI’ve learned to look at what is apparent and look for what ISN’T there as well. I’m a newbie collector but I’ve used this approach in my other endeavors. I suspect the seller has a Cody letter in hand in addition to the referenced letter from Ms. Muerrle but neither support the seller’s description. Most sellers of a gun in this price range would post a picture of these letters if they had them, and apparently they do. Something’s missing and I’m thinking it’s not something the seller wants a buyer to know, IMHO.
Log In

