Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Blown out? wood below upper tang
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 15, 2016 - 9:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Why do ’94’s have that slim piece of wood missing beneath the upper tang, just below the hammer?

Strong recoil from hot loads?  Catching it on a cleaning rag and crying?WACA-question.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
New Mexico
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1167
Member Since:
December 1, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 15, 2016 - 10:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

That’s a weak spot on 1873’s, 1876’s, 1886’s, 1892’s and 1894’s (and maybe others out of my sphere of interest).  The wood is too thin to last very long and all these models show missing slivers in that area after time.  I’d call it a design flaw but don’t know how it could have been made differently.

The only model I know of that has splitting wood problems due to recoil is the model 1885.  Supposedly, that is due to the taper of the tang screw acting somewhat as a log splitter when experiencing recoil.

1876-4-1.jpg

"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend." 

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4660
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 16, 2016 - 3:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

On a 73, I don’t think its a recoil issue since there isn’t much recoil. I always figured it was from people removing stocks to clean the gun and if removed wrong you chip the wood and then the wood becomes loose to the metal which then can cause cracks & chipped wood.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 532
Member Since:
December 27, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 16, 2016 - 4:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Dang!  The computer ate my response to you two.  Something screwy in the neighborhood tonight.  Neighbors are having trouble too.

Instead of rewriting it, I’ll simply say, “Thank you, Fellows.”

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 16, 2016 - 12:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think it happens when the stock is taken off and then upon re-assembly it goes on a bit cockeyed and doesnt slide all the way home easily. I have had this feel when putting stocks back on.

if frustrated bubba hits the butt to get it right up it will split easily

 

Phil

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
NE OREGON
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 538
Member Since:
July 8, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
September 16, 2016 - 1:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

In my opinion it has nothing to do with recoil and is ALWAYS an operator error when taking the butt stock off or re-installing it. One has to be very careful and pay attention to business.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1937
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
September 16, 2016 - 6:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have seen this on a lot of Winchesters various models. I think it is from dropping the gun in a vertical position onto its butt plate, as I’ve seen it on guns that I believe to have never been disassembled. Or from other kinds of day to day use / abuse. Also see a lot of chipped off pieces at the bottom of the buttstock on the bottom end of the buttplate at the toe.

Hey what else can you expect from guns that range from 75 to 150 years old? Crap happens.

Sincerely,

Maverick 

Avatar
Los Angeles
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
January 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
September 16, 2016 - 6:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Maverick said

Hey what else can you expect from guns that range from 75 to 150 years old? Crap happens.

Sincerely,

Maverick   

People actually used these things. Imagine that!

Steve

WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6194
Chuck: 5609
steve004: 5039
1873man: 4660
Big Larry: 2508
twobit: 2478
mrcvs: 2131
Maverick: 1937
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14436
Posts: 128462

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2021
Members: 9790
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation