Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Another Bee to Add to the Mystery!
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
August 12, 2020 - 12:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Maverick said
I’m pretty sure this one is an authentic 92 in 218 BEE.

Cody92-218BEE.jpgImage Enlarger

And it doesn’t look like they did anything to change the marking on the barrel.

Sincerely,

Maverick  

Brady,

Do you know what the serial number is on that Carbine?  I found two experimental Model 65 218 Bee Carbines listed in the Winchester Museum collection (which I assume are now in the valuts at the CFM).  Serial number 1002520 collection item #1256, and serial number 1003119 collection item #1314.  I very much suspect that the picture you posted is serial number 1002520, as it is listed as having a 22-H rear sight.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1585
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
August 12, 2020 - 9:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

rogertherelic said
Maverick,  That is a fabulous carbine.  I have never seen the 218 BEE in a carbine configuration.  Especially with a plain pistol grip.  Do you know the serial number?  Roger B.  

Bert H. said

Brady,

Do you know what the serial number is on that Carbine?  I found two experimental Model 65 218 Bee Carbines listed in the Winchester Museum collection (which I assume are now in the valuts at the CFM).  Serial number 1002520 collection item #1256, and serial number 1003119 collection item #1314.  I very much suspect that the picture you posted is serial number 1002520, as it is listed as having a 22-H rear sight.

Bert  

Roger & Bert,

I do not know the serial number of said rifle, but would imagine a call to Cody may answer that question. And Bert I suspect that you are correct. 

It is a Dandy indeed! The striking thing I notice is how drastically different the barrel marking is from other “genuine 218 Bee” guns out there that I’ve seen. Why would Winchester take a Roll die from a Model 43 and modify it to say 92? Or re-stamp a barrel to add 92 onto it? When they could go to the drawer and pull the roll die that marked this barrel off shelf.

The photo is from the Cody Firearms Museum’s Twitter Feed. Found here: https://twitter.com/codyfirearms/status/1162425153138987008/photo/1

There are some other nice topics / guns they post from time to time there.

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10850
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
August 12, 2020 - 9:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Brady,

I suspect that Winchester used remarked Model 43 barrels because they were plentiful, and they were the correct length (24-inches). The 3-4 Model 92 218 Bee rifles were (I suspect) all late production late parts clean-up guns, assembled in 1950 or later (based on the barrel dates confirmed thus far). The Model 92/65 Carbine in question was manufactured in 1939 as an “experimental” piece, and most likely used the existing roll mark dies. By 1950, the original roll dies had most likely been scrapped.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: dimrod
Guest(s) 210
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5055
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12784
Posts: 111359

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8871
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation