Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1876 winchester generations
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10723
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
61
March 14, 2023 - 6:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

This is for you “old dogs”…

If you are having trouble posting or resizing your pictures, send them to me in an email message and I will fix them for you… I work very cheaply, usually a free donut and cup of coffee will suffice.

Bert – The “not so old” dog!

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4566
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
62
March 14, 2023 - 6:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Tim, I’ll do it for just a cup of coffee.  I’m already too fat.  This old dog started using computers in the mid 80’s before things like windows.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 564
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
63
March 14, 2023 - 7:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

All, I tried taking another picture and it says it is smaller than the 3 mpixel limit of our site.  Will see.  I hate taking and posting pix for this reason!!  Do rather enjoy being a stand up/sit down comedian though.  This angled picture doesn’t show the bright end of the stud the pin on the lever contacts as well as the one I sent to Bert to “fix” and post for me, but will maybe help in the meantime.  Tim

 

20230314_143932.jpgImage Enlarger  Tim-T-picture.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10723
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
64
March 14, 2023 - 7:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
Tim, I’ll do it for just a cup of coffee.  I’m already too fat.  This old dog started using computers in the mid 80’s before things like windows.

  

You Cheap SOB… you are undercutting my offer !! Smile

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 564
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
65
March 14, 2023 - 7:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert and Chuck!  Settle down!  I will spring for coffee AND donuts first thing they open!  Tim.  PS.  Don’t know why the forum doesn’t like my photos!

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10723
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
66
March 14, 2023 - 8:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

tim tomlinson said
Bert and Chuck!  Settle down!  I will spring for coffee AND donuts first thing they open!  Tim.  PS.  Don’t know why the forum doesn’t like my photos!

  

I am just yanking Chucks chain for the fun of it… we have been friends for 20+ years.

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4280
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
67
March 14, 2023 - 8:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

86Win said
P1030308.JPGImage EnlargerP1030309.JPGImage EnlargerGood morning Tim,

I thought you might like to see what I am talking about. Even though this thread is about 76s I wonder if this has anything to do with 73s and 76s. This rifle is SN 173020A (1885). You will notice that the hole is directly under the trigger block pin. It’s like 2 different vintage parts.

Enlightenment will be appreciated. Don

  

Is there a hole from the top where the trigger block rides? So if a key is not installed the hammer can’t be pulled.

If there is no hole on the top then the only thing that comes to mind is when I was a kid I had a lever action cap gun and it had a hinged piece of metal on the lever so when you folded it forward it would catch and pull the trigger so you would fire as soon as the lever was closed. For that to work in this gun the hole would have to be at the lower junction on the lever.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
New Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
March 21, 1988
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
68
March 14, 2023 - 9:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Very interesting.  I don’t know if this will help anyone, but in case it might, here it is.  Early 76’s I have owned:

#235, Open Top;

#135?, Open Top Carbine;

#3524 Open Top;

#4963, Lid and mentioned in the records;

#5588, .50 Ex. with Lid and correct semi-script “.50 Cal. 95 Grs.” engraved, Lid not mentioned in the records;

#5930 Open Top.

#5930 was the highest number open top I’d seen, then a few years later I saw one in the 8000 range at the Cody Show.

In the late 80s, Bill Porter and I were scanning the ledgers researching the above .50 Ex..  We learned that most .50 Ex. through the 10,000+ range (we got tired of looking) were received in the warehouse as .45-75s then changed to Express before being shipped.  Sometimes the change would be six months or more before the gun was shipped (probably anticipating orders).  Anyway, to get back to point, during this research, we noticed the “Lid” notations.  Very early serial numbers had Lid notations and later ones did not.  Sometimes there would be large blocks with Lids and sometimes they would be scattered here and there.  We did not note the shipping dates for the ones marked “Lid”.  That might have shed a little more light on things.  About the posts concerning early guns with lids that are not noted in the records, I concure with TR and Tim, there were omissions in the records and “let the rifle tell you”.  Compare the machining and parts with a gun you know is correct.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4566
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
69
March 14, 2023 - 10:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

tim tomlinson said
Bert and Chuck!  Settle down!  I will spring for coffee AND donuts first thing they open!  Tim.  PS.  Don’t know why the forum doesn’t like my photos!

  

And I’m holding you to it!  Why don’t you go to Greeley so I don’t have to wait so long.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4566
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
70
March 14, 2023 - 10:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Mark Nordland said
Very interesting.  I don’t know if this will help anyone, but in case it might, here it is.  Early 76’s I have owned:

#235, Open Top;

#135?, Open Top Carbine;

#3524 Open Top;

#4963, Lid and mentioned in the records;

#5588, .50 Ex. with Lid and correct semi-script “.50 Cal. 95 Grs.” engraved, Lid not mentioned in the records;

#5930 Open Top.

#5930 was the highest number open top I’d seen, then a few years later I saw one in the 8000 range at the Cody Show.

In the late 80s, Bill Porter and I were scanning the ledgers researching the above .50 Ex..  We learned that most .50 Ex. through the 10,000+ range (we got tired of looking) were received in the warehouse as .45-75s then changed to Express before being shipped.  Sometimes the change would be six months or more before the gun was shipped (probably anticipating orders).  Anyway, to get back to point, during this research, we noticed the “Lid” notations.  Very early serial numbers had Lid notations and later ones did not.  Sometimes there would be large blocks with Lids and sometimes they would be scattered here and there.  We did not note the shipping dates for the ones marked “Lid”.  That might have shed a little more light on things.  About the posts concerning early guns with lids that are not noted in the records, I concure with TR and Tim, there were omissions in the records and “let the rifle tell you”.  Compare the machining and parts with a gun you know is correct.

  

Mark I heard something like that about the early 50-95’s at least 20 years ago.  Al Perry had one of these.  I was picking for Walt Hallstein when his knees were so bad and when I found this gun I made him go look at it.  It was one of those guns that looked like a very old re blue to me.  According to Walt it was when it was made into the 50-95.  First time I have heard that story since then.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
71
March 15, 2023 - 2:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Another thought on finger lever hole. The keyhole side is to prevent rotation of the pin through hole. Go with it guys! Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
March 13, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
72
March 16, 2023 - 12:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

This hammer block pin is interesting. My s/n 1286 1876 does not have the hammer block. You can drop the hammer even with the finger lever open. I find it strange that Tim’s s/n 544 1876 has it and mine does not. You would think that once a safety was incorporated, every s/n after that would have it .

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4280
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
73
March 16, 2023 - 1:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If your gun has a set trigger you don’t have a trigger block safety. You couldn’t have both.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
74
March 16, 2023 - 1:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

My 1876 lettered as having a set trigger removed before shipping and has a trigger block. My 1873 with a hole in finger lever also has trigger block. Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
March 13, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
75
March 16, 2023 - 1:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bob, That would explain it, as mine has a set trigger.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4280
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
76
March 16, 2023 - 1:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

86Win said
My 1876 lettered as having a set trigger removed before shipping and has a trigger block. My 1873 with a hole in finger lever also has trigger block. Don

  

You probably have the a slot in the tang for the set trigger. I’ve seen many 73’s like that. Does the hole in the lever just has the one hole going crosswise or does it have a second hole from the top?

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 233
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
77
March 16, 2023 - 3:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

No hole in top. I posted pictures of hole on March 14. I am leaning towards some sort of cowboy action shooting (rifleman style). Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
March 13, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
78
March 16, 2023 - 8:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I recieved my Cody letter today for my 1876, s/n 1286 in 45-75 cal, and it reads;

Type: Rifle

Barrel Type: Octagon

Trigger: Set

Received in warehouse on Jan 18, 1878

Shipped from warehouse on May 08, 1878, order number 6029

 

It doesn’t mention the dust cover just like some of the letters that are in this post. It has all the indicators that it’s a early first model, like no caliber markings and the big hammer. So, is it considered a first model that happens to have a dust cover? Or how would you describe it? 

JJConfused

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 341
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
79
March 16, 2023 - 8:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

James Wallace said
I recieved my Cody letter today for my 1876, s/n 1286 in 45-75 cal, and it reads;

Type: Rifle

Barrel Type: Octagon

Trigger: Set

Received in warehouse on Jan 18, 1878

Shipped from warehouse on May 08, 1878, order number 6029

 

It doesn’t mention the dust cover just like some of the letters that are in this post. It has all the indicators that it’s a early first model, like no caliber markings and the big hammer. So, is it considered a first model that happens to have a dust cover? Or how would you describe it? 

JJConfused

  

James,

Remember, the First, Second and Third model labels are collector terms.  Winchester didn’t use them.  Collectors may have different interpretations of the model types.  From my perspective, if it has a dust cover (lid) it is a second model.  My guess is your rifle was made without a dust cover and then had one installed at some later time.  It may have been the Winchester factory, possibly a company like Hartley & Graham, Simmons, J.P. Lower, or even a local gunsmith, etc.

The lack of caliber markings on .45-75 rifles goes into the third model serial number range.  The large hammer was an early rifle feature, as is the buttplate with large toe.

Others may have a different view.

Here is a first model SN 267 with large toe buttplate, large hammer, trigger block, no dust cover.  

IMG_0940-Copy.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 647
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
80
March 16, 2023 - 10:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

You’re right on the money, Bill.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Antonio, [email protected]
Guest(s) 56
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6280
TXGunNut: 4968
Chuck: 4566
1873man: 4280
steve004: 4160
Big Larry: 2323
twobit: 2289
TR: 1710
mrcvs: 1706
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12645
Posts: 109951

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1745
Members: 8789
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation