Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
winchester letter
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 3
Member Since:
September 23, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 7, 2024 - 12:36 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

this letter said the 73 was the first rim fire instead of the first center fire the serial number in this letter i own that gun.20241006_130056-2.jpgImage Enlarger20241006_131028.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
October 7, 2024 - 1:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Fred Dull said
this letter said the 73 was the first rim fire instead of the first center fire the serial number in this letter i own that gun.

D.C. Merrill writes like an 8th-grade drop-out, that, or a dope-head.  Letter says “no record” of this serial.  So why is he talking about RFs?  Does he mean rifle was built as a RF & converted to .38 WCF?  Letter is incomprehensible.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4567
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 7, 2024 - 1:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Your gun must have a blank line in the ledger. Its not unheard of. Whoever wrote the letter obviously make a mistake. I’ve read some of the responses to inquiries by Winchester in the McCracken Research Library during the 50’s and they went through a couple drafts before sending them out.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 7, 2024 - 1:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said
Your gun must have a blank line in the ledger. Its not unheard of. Whoever wrote the letter obviously make a mistake. I’ve read some of the responses to inquiries by Winchester in the McCracken Research Library during the 50’s and they went through a couple drafts before sending them out. 

Tom Hall never wrote anything as asinine as this.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4567
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 7, 2024 - 1:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

clarence said
D.C. Merrill writes like an 8th-grade drop-out, that, or a dope-head.  Letter says “no record” of this serial.  So why is he talking about RFs?  Does he mean rifle was built as a RF & converted to .38 WCF?  Letter is incomprehensible.

  

He was talking about the production history of the 73. If you replace “rim” with “center fire” it makes sense. In 1946 the 73 didn’t have much interest in it besides a discontinued gun. After the Movie came out, interest in them took off.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
October 7, 2024 - 1:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said

He was talking about the production history of the 73. If you replace “rim” with “center fire” it makes sense.

Bob

Even so, what’s the relevance of all that extraneous BS to Mr. Franck’s inquiry about the parts he needed? 

But to a more interesting point:  can anyone here tell me without resorting to Google who the most celebrated resident of Wellsboro, Pa, was?  (Hint–not Mr. Franck.)

Avatar
Location: 32000' +
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 2385
Member Since:
July 17, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
October 7, 2024 - 2:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I believe this letter is in direct response to an inquiry made of the “Winchester Service Department” and since we don’t have the initial inquiry we might be taking some things out of context.  Also, the 1873 was the first .22 rimfire that Winchester produced so the (poorly written) response may be in regards to that historical fact, so if you add “.22” in front of rimfire that works also.  Just my thoughts…..  

Best Regards,

WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire

http://rimfirepublications.com/  

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5332
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
October 7, 2024 - 4:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Fred, that is a cool letter. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1811
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
October 8, 2024 - 12:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Fred Dull said
this letter said the 73 was the first rim fire instead of the first center fire the serial number in this letter i own that gun.20241006_130056-2.jpgImage Enlarger20241006_131028.jpgImage Enlarger

  

I agree with Jeff and I think you guys are miss reading the letter, or the writer’s intent with the statement in said letter. The letter is speaking in broad terms and is correctly stating that Winchester’s first Rifle in .22 Rimfire is the Model 73.

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
October 8, 2024 - 1:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Maverick said I agree with Jeff and I think you guys are miss reading the letter, or the writer’s intent with the statement in said letter. The letter is speaking in broad terms and is correctly stating that Winchester’s first Rifle in .22 Rimfire is the Model 73. 

Maybe so, but WTF does that have to do with the subject .38 WCF rifle of Mr Franck’s inquiry?  Poor guy inquired about certain parts he needed, & received this incoherent ramble?  Why not throw in that the first .22 RF was mfg by S&W?  (Except I seriously doubt Mr Merrill had ever heard of that fact.)

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5332
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
October 8, 2024 - 4:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I still like the letter.  It shows how far we have come since 1946.  I bet there wasn’t as much of a concern for details as there is now. 

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
October 8, 2024 - 4:47 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
I still like the letter.  It shows how far we have come since 1946.  I bet there wasn’t as much of a concern for details as there is now.  

Not true at all if you’re referring to the company as a whole.  Internal memos discussing product development, improvements, or problems are painstakingly detailed.  Anyway, concern for details & lucidity are two different matters.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5332
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
October 8, 2024 - 5:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

Chuck said

I still like the letter.  It shows how far we have come since 1946.  I bet there wasn’t as much of a concern for details as there is now.  

Not true at all if you’re referring to the company as a whole.  Internal memos discussing product development, improvements, or problems are painstakingly detailed.  Anyway, concern for details & lucidity are two different matters.

  

I was referring to the “Factory Letters” or whatever they may have been called for this type of response to a customer 78 years ago. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 814
Member Since:
February 17, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
October 10, 2024 - 11:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I am not going to get involved in this dribble of what was or wasn’t said in the letter. I will state that my earliest letter is dated 1968, so to me a letter from ‘ 45 is really quite interesting. BTW Clarence, do you have a letter that old? Why do you continually disparage others? Really unbecoming of someone of your supposed intellect.     

Avatar
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
October 11, 2024 - 12:50 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

oldcrankyyankee said
I am not going to get involved in this dribble of what was or wasn’t said in the letter. I will state that my earliest letter is dated 1968, so to me a letter from ‘ 45 is really quite interesting. BTW Clarence, do you have a letter that old? Why do you continually disparage others? Really unbecoming of someone of your supposed intellect.      

Others?  Which others?  I was receiving letters from Tom Hall when I was in HS in the late ’50s.  

Is this gratuitous & irrelevant comment of yours an example of what you mean by “disparaging others”?                

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12180
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
October 11, 2024 - 4:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

Maverick said I agree with Jeff and I think you guys are miss reading the letter, or the writer’s intent with the statement in said letter. The letter is speaking in broad terms and is correctly stating that Winchester’s first Rifle in .22 Rimfire is the Model 73. 

Maybe so, but WTF does that have to do with the subject .38 WCF rifle of Mr Franck’s inquiry?  Poor guy inquired about certain parts he needed, & received this incoherent ramble?  Why not throw in that the first .22 RF was mfg by S&W?  (Except I seriously doubt Mr Merrill had ever heard of that fact.)

  

The next time you use that term on this forum, you will be banned from this website for a 6-month period. Try acting like an adult!

Bert – Admin

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: [email protected]
Guest(s) 55
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5913
Chuck: 5332
steve004: 4868
1873man: 4567
Big Larry: 2472
twobit: 2412
mrcvs: 2051
TR: 1838
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14032
Posts: 124168

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1968
Members: 9578
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation