Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Question about .405 Winchester Die or Bullet Mold
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5668
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
April 21, 2025 - 8:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Maverick, have you seen any accounts that talk about people or rifles getting hurt when loading the new smokeless?  I’m not sure I have.  But maybe I just don’t remember it.  Makes a lot of sense though.  I’ll have to look through some of my earliest loading manuals.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 817
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
22
April 21, 2025 - 9:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck,  Rifles harmed?  No.  Shotguns, yes!  Clarence sent me a batch of reading on “The Shootinest Gent’man” or something close.  One of his acquaintances blew a barrel on a high grade, English fowling piece.  Blamed the new “white powder” for it.  Wildfowlers were really into reloading back then.  Hope I’ve listed enough for you to come up with his name–currently escapes me!  Tim

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 817
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
23
April 22, 2025 - 12:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck I just HAD to go and get his name!  Nash Buckingham.  Shot a LOT, and wrote about his experiences.  There was the one story where another southern gentleman reloaded using the new smokeless powder in his very nice, English made side by side.  It failed and did damage to the gun, the shooter and his guide.  The main concerns were with the shotgun however.  I can but imagine just how nice and expensive it had been.  Tim

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1981
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
24
April 22, 2025 - 5:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
Maverick, have you seen any accounts that talk about people or rifles getting hurt when loading the new smokeless?  I’m not sure I have.  But maybe I just don’t remember it.  Makes a lot of sense though.  I’ll have to look through some of my earliest loading manuals.  

I would have to track down the period accounts that I’ve come across, but yes it was a major concern in the early days of smokeless powder.

And not just a concern had by Winchester. I would image that all fire manufacturers of the era had such concerns. Researching the topic of reloading I came across the 1905 Smith & Wesson Catalog that also heavily discourages reloading with smokeless and state that they do not warrant there pistols shooting reloaded smokeless cartridges. 

Here are pages 19 & 46 that have specific discussion on the matter. The reason I kept track of this information did not have to do with reloading with smokeless. 

1905SWCatalog-SmokelessWarnings.jpgImage EnlargerWhat interested me about the catalog is where it specifically states recommending using Winchester’s Tool for Reloading Winchester caliber cartridges. Even though S&W had their own brand / make of reloading tools and molds for sale. This is one of the most unusual endorsements I’ve found where another firearm’s manufacturer has done such a thing. 

Sincerely,

Maverick 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5668
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
25
April 23, 2025 - 6:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I went through my non Winchester loading catalogs and couldn’t find a thing.  In Philip Sharpe’s book Complete Guide to Handloading the first chapter is titled Problems of the Handloader.  He devotes 4 pages to loading the smokeless powder and especially using max loads.  I know chronographs were available but maybe not economic for the average loader.  I have a big gap of loading manuals from 1900 to 1937.  None of the Winchester Catalogs give an amount of smokeless powder.  They tell you almost everything else.  Including how much black powder.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2150
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
26
April 23, 2025 - 7:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
I went through my non Winchester loading catalogs and couldn’t find a thing.  In Philip Sharpe’s book Complete Guide to Handloading the first chapter is titled Problems of the Handloader.  He devotes 4 pages to loading the smokeless powder and especially using max loads.  I know chronographs were available but maybe not economic for the average loader.  I have a big gap of loading manuals from 1900 to 1937.  None of the Winchester Catalogs give an amount of smokeless powder.  They tell you almost everything else.  Including how much black powder.  

To fill that 1900 to 1937 gap, look for Mattern’s Handloading Ammunition, published in 1926.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5668
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
27
April 23, 2025 - 7:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you for the tip.  I found a hard cover reprint online for $25.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6236
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
28
April 23, 2025 - 9:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
Thank you for the tip.  I found a hard cover reprint online for $25.

  

Buy it, I’ve really enjoyed my copy. The original copies are a bit fragile. Mattern had a very clear understanding of internal ballistics and offers an explanation I wish I had read decades ago.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1981
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
29
April 24, 2025 - 1:53 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
I went through my non Winchester loading catalogs and couldn’t find a thing. None of the Winchester Catalogs give an amount of smokeless powder.  They tell you almost everything else.  Including how much black powder.  

For whatever reason WRACo intentionally did not include smokeless information in their catalogs. But produced pamphlets for reloading smokeless in rifle and pistol cartridges. They also had a separate pamphlet for reloading smokeless in shot shells. Both highly discourage reloading with smokeless and yet go onto and give the information for reloading with smokeless. 

In addition to sometimes being included in Reloading Tool boxes the pamphlets were included in their ammunition boxes. This is an area I’m trying to do more research on and trying to figure out when this practice occurred. So far I’ve found information from 1897-1905, but have yet to find much information after 1905.

30WCF3.jpgImage Enlarger30WCFBoxAndBrochure.jpgImage EnlargerProperSmokelessForShotShells.JPGImage Enlarger

Sincerely,

Maverick

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: pine_worker, DEEREHART, Bryan Austin, Green River Gus, IdahoPB
Guest(s) 197
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6236
Chuck: 5668
steve004: 5058
1873man: 4669
Big Larry: 2517
twobit: 2484
mrcvs: 2150
Maverick: 1981
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14508
Posts: 129288

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2030
Members: 9836
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation