To the best of my knowledge, NO they did not. If you find someone trying to sell you one, I’d be very suspicious that it is a fake. Which I’ve seen.
Ideal made tools and molds during the early 1900s in the .405 WCF. So if you want a some what period tool, Ideal is best bet.
To elaborate further, very few Winchester loading tools and molds were designed for use with Smokeless powder. The few calibers that were designed with smokeless in mind were encouraged to be reloaded with Black Powder by the company. For their Reloading Tools, only one tool was utilized for smokeless cartridges, the 1894 Tool. Which should be obvious as to why, but to state the obvious, smokeless wasn’t loaded by Winchester until 1893-95 timeframe. As it basically hadn’t been invented yet.
In the 1894 Tool, cataloged was basically six smokeless cartridges. The .236 U.S. Navy, 25-35 WCF, 30 WCF, 30 Gov., 303 Savage, and 32 W.S.
The .236 Navy is a rare hard to find tool. The 32 W.S. was marketed as designed for both smokeless and black powder. The 25-35 WCF, 30 WCF & 30 Gov. were also sold with “Short Range” dies for loading with black powder.
In the 1894 Tool, un-cataloged calibers are reportedly in .32 S.L., 35 S.L., .401 S.L. and 33 WCF. All being extremely rare. I own a tool in .401 S.L. that was once owned by Lewis Yearout.
In the Bullet Mold, only Short Range molds were sold for the 25-35 WCF, 30 WCF and 30 Gov. I don’t believe they made a mold for the 303 Savage. They did make a mold marked for the .32 W.S. and depending on when it was made will be found in 100grs Round Bullet or 117 grains flat point bullet.
Here are some pictures of a 1894 Tool with a bunch of Faked or Homemade dies. One of which is in 405 WCF, 22 Lovell, 300 Savage and another in 219 Zipper, which Winchester never made.
Other than Winchester wanting to discourage the act of reloading with smokeless. The standard size 1894 Tool is basically too short to reload the 405 WCF. It is a rather long cartridge. The 1882 Tool with and adjustable die could have possibly worked, but Winchester never made it for any smokeless calibers.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Thanks for that,Mav.All very good information to have.No there was no one trying to sell me one.I was just wondering if one was made.As you stated, I remember reading somewhere that Winchester was trying to discourage the reloading of smokeless powder.
Interesting that some smokeless powder cartridges they did make dies and mold for,but to encourage the use of black powder and for short range only.
Interesting about the 32,35, 401 and 33 dies?Was a bullet mold available for them?Were they for short range as well?
The 1914 Catalog is the last to list reloading tools, by the 1916 Catalog it has a statement discouraging reloading ammunition and no tools listed.
Prior to 1916, what I would call somewhat mixed messages were made by Winchester. On one hand they discouraged reloading with smokeless and in catalogs and on instruction sheets listed black powder amounts for reloading. But they also produced a separate flyer/leaflet that had the loadings for smokeless and did so from the 1896 to 1914 timeframe or so.
They were trying their best to limit their liability from lawsuits and ended up just getting out of the reloading tool business. Which I always found odd, as it was a fair market share for them and Ideal, BGI with others took over the market. Ideal continued in the market for a long long time.
But another part of this change has to do with the post WW1 plan, the Winchester Store Era, and the failure then sale to Olin.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
On pages 155 and 156 of the 1920 Catalog under “Reloading Smokeless Cartridges Impractical” they talk about the issues of loading with smokeless powder.
“For this reason, the Winchester Repeating Arms Company cautions it’s patrons against loading or reloading smokeless powder rifle ammunition, and wishes to do its utmost to discourage this practice”
I have in my collection an almost NIB Winchester reloading tool (for the 25-20 S.S.). The box contains the reloading tool w/decapping pin, the powder measure (for black powder), the bullet mold, (3) .22 caliber targets, advertisement for Winchester grease, and the reloading information for both Black powder and Smokeless powder.
Pictures…
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Bert H. said
I have in my collection an almost NIB Winchester reloading tool (for the 25-20 S.S.). The box contains the reloading tool w/decapping pin, the powder measure (for black powder), the bullet mold, (3) .22 caliber targets, advertisement for Winchester grease, and the reloading information for both Black powder and Smokeless powder.Pictures…
Yes but they caution the use of smokeless when mentioned. Probably a legal statement. I have no idea if smokeless problems influenced the loading tools?
You’ll notice that the “Proper Loads of Smokeless Powder For Winchester Rifle and Pistol Cartridges” is its own separate pamphlet and the information was intentionally not put on the instruction sheet or in catalogs. These pamphlets were included in the boxed reloading tools and also inside ammunition boxes during certain years of production. I have found different variations of these pamphlets from 1898 to 1905. I have yet to locate one dated after 1905, they may exist but hadn’t found one yet. They also made a separate pamphlet(s) that discusses loading shot shells with smokeless powders.
Chuck said I have no idea if smokeless problems influenced the loading tools?
Very much so, along with dealing with lawsuits from injured or killed customers that mistakenly / wrongfully reloaded ammunition with smokeless powders. Winchester slowly began discouraging reloading with smokeless and over time more so. Ultimately until getting out of the reloading business.
For their smokeless cartridges they even began not including powder measures with their tools to discourage reloading smokeless.
This notice is from a 1911-1913 dated era tool. Statements were put on box end labels and warnings were placed on hang tags on rifles.
They had developed these and other various forms of ad campaigns discouraging reloading with smokeless up until the 1916 Catalog #80 which removes all information, prices, pictures, or any data pertaining to loading tools or bullet molds. They do continue to sell primers, primed and empty cases and bullets. And the catalog goes on to state “Winchester Repeating Arms Co., cautions its patrons against loading or reloading smokeless powder rifle ammunition, and wishes to do its utmost to discourage this practice.”
Maybe one day I’ll get around to writing an article in specific detail about this topic and/or include it in a book.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
The instruction sheet in my 25-20 S.S. reloading tool box is dated 9-4-15, and all of the other documents (including the Smokeless Powder load information) are original to the box. I will dig it out to see of the Smokeless load sheet has a date on it.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
28 gauge said
Interesting about the 32,35, 401 and 33 dies? Was a bullet mold available for them? Were they for short range as well?
The tools in .32 S.L., 35 S.L., .401 S.L. and 33 WCF were all apparently special order. To the best of my knowledge no bullet molds were available or ever made. These non-cataloged calibers were not for “short range” cartridges, at least not the self-loaders as that would cause jamming issues. These tools would have been intended loading using primed empty cases and pre-cast factory made bullets. Not with bullets cast from your own mold.
In the Bullet Mold, only Short Range molds were sold for the 25-35 WCF, 30 WCF and 30 Gov. This just has to do with just the molds. But Winchester also sold factory made grooved bullets of lead and/or jacketed bullets for loading smokeless cartridges. Often sold packaged in a box of 25 bullets per box.
Which in my mind was certainly mixed messaging for a number of years on their part. We “Winchester” state that we discourage you from Reloading with Smokeless. But we will sell you the primers, brass, powder, and bullets along with giving you a pamphlet on how to do so. Which is why ultimately, among other reasons, why they got out of the reloading tool business.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Bert H. said
The instruction sheet in my 25-20 S.S. reloading tool box is dated 9-4-15, and all of the other documents (including the Smokeless Powder load information) that are original to the box. I will dig it out to see of the Smokeless load sheet has a date on it.Bert
The instruction sheet is dated “9-4-15M”, which I believe is a printers code to mean September-1904-15,000 copies.
If I recall correctly the Smokeless pamphlet on the back side bottom corner has a printers code of “1-3”, which I believe to mean January 1903.
The Do You Want A Gun? AD Insert dates to 1902, as the last model shown at the bottom is the Model 1902 Single Shot Bolt 22.
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Maverick said
Bert H. said
The instruction sheet in my 25-20 S.S. reloading tool box is dated 9-4-15, and all of the other documents (including the Smokeless Powder load information) that are original to the box. I will dig it out to see of the Smokeless load sheet has a date on it.
Bert
The instruction sheet is dated “9-4-15M”, which I believe is a printers code to mean September-1904-15,000 copies.
If I recall correctly the Smokeless pamphlet on the back side bottom corner has a printers code of “1-3”, which I believe to mean January 1903.
The Do You Want A Gun? AD Insert dates to 1902, as the last model shown at the bottom is the Model 1902 Single Shot Bolt 22.
OK… interesting.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Bert,
The next version box after yours includes the words Trade Mark on it. Both on the top label and end label. In use 1902-1906.
By 1906 Winchester is in quotes, “Winchester”.
By 1910 the Big Red W was in use on box labels.
These changes in labeling are very similar to cartridge box labels.
Your box specifically dates from sometime 1904-1905, due to its contents. The box itself is an earlier box likely made before 1902, before the use of the phrase Trade Mark. Likely the box sat around a couple of years before being packaged up at the factory and sold. I’ve seen boxes with older top labels and new end labels. This same sort of thing is found with cartridge boxes.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Maverick said
Bert,The next version box after yours includes the words Trade Mark on it. Both on the top label and end label. In use 1902-1906.
By 1906 Winchester is in quotes, “Winchester”.
By 1910 the Big Red W was in use on box labels.
These changes in labeling are very similar to cartridge box labels.
Your box specifically dates from sometime 1904-1905, due to its contents. The box itself is an earlier box likely made before 1902, before the use of the phrase Trade Mark. Likely the box sat around a couple of years before being packaged up at the factory and sold. I’ve seen boxes with older top labels and new end labels. This same sort of thing is found with cartridge boxes.
Sincerely,
Maverick
Brady,
Thank you for the added information… I most certainly hope that you someday write and publish a detailed book about this topic.
I have a slightly older boxed set for the 22 Center Fire as well.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Bert H. said I most certainly hope that you someday write and publish a detailed book about this topic.
That is the grand plan and a work in progress for sure. I often envy those fellow authors out there that have published a book and praise them for such endeavors. Speaking with Lou Behling recently, I understand how his Rimfire book is somewhat a life’s work for him. He came close to publishing at previous points in time, for example all the photography at one point was all in B&W, but later redone all in color. I know Shuey worked for on his shot shell manuscript for years to no fruition. I wonder how may projects of Herb Houze went un-finished.
As Lone Watie in the Outlaw Joesy Wales says, “Endeavor to Persevere!”.
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
Maverick said
Bert H. said I most certainly hope that you someday write and publish a detailed book about this topic.
That is the grand plan and a work in progress for sure. I often envy those fellow authors out there that have published a book and praise them for such endeavors. Speaking with Lou Behling recently, I understand how his Rimfire book is somewhat a life’s work for him. He came close to publishing at previous points in time, for example all the photography at one point was all in B&W, but later redone all in color. I know Shuey worked for on his shot shell manuscript for years to no fruition. I wonder how may projects of Herb Houze went un-finished.
As Lone Watie in the Outlaw Joesy Wales says, “Endeavor to Persevere!”.
We most certainly lost Dan and Herb way too soon… but fortunately, there are still several of us that can provide you with moral support and a few helpful hints (Brad, Jeff, and myself to name a few).
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
November 7, 2015

In Mattern’s ca. 1926 reloading book he expressed his opinion that the Winchester tools and moulds were obsolete. That came as a bit of a surprise to me. I enjoyed using an original Winchester mould for an article awhile back and can now agree that it was less than ideal for modern reloading. I hope to use one of my original Winchester reloading tools someday, just for grins. Mattern also addressed in detail the burn characteristics and dangers of smokeless powders.
Mike
Maverick said
28 gauge said
Interesting about the 32,35, 401 and 33 dies? Was a bullet mold available for them? Were they for short range as well?
The tools in .32 S.L., 35 S.L., .401 S.L. and 33 WCF were all apparently special order. To the best of my knowledge no bullet molds were available or ever made. These non-cataloged calibers were not for “short range” cartridges, at least not the self-loaders as that would cause jamming issues. These tools would have been intended loading using primed empty cases and pre-cast factory made bullets. Not with bullets cast from your own mold.
In the Bullet Mold, only Short Range molds were sold for the 25-35 WCF, 30 WCF and 30 Gov. This just has to do with just the molds. But Winchester also sold factory made grooved bullets of lead and/or jacketed bullets for loading smokeless cartridges. Often sold packaged in a box of 25 bullets per box.
Which in my mind was certainly mixed messaging for a number of years on their part. We “Winchester” state that we discourage you from Reloading with Smokeless. But we will sell you the primers, brass, powder, and bullets along with giving you a pamphlet on how to do so. Which is why ultimately, among other reasons, why they got out of the reloading tool business.
Sincerely,
Maverick
Thanks for that information.That’s what I kind of figured about the three SL cartridges.It would have to be pretty much full power, to get the action to work as it should.
Hope to be able to get your book when you get it finished.I am sure it will be a most interesting read.
1 Guest(s)
