Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Model 1885 Winder (87)? 22 Short
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
December 1, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 2, 2020 - 7:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi,

Tying to help my mother-in-law with her late husband’s collection.  One of the rifles is what I believe is an 1885 Winder, caliber 22 Short.  I don’t have a picture of the upper tang at this time.  I inserted the pics I have below.  I know absolutely nothing about these rifles other than what I’ve been able to piece together online.  I believe the rifle is a 3rd model (maybe 87?).  Not sure if it has US stamp or not because it didn’t know to look for it when I was with the rifle. 

Interested in any info available and any estimates of value.

Thanks,

Shane

 

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

 

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1100
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 2, 2020 - 9:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

OK Shane what I see is a Winder Musket commonly known as an ’85 lo-wall musket, however Winchester did catalogue them as a mod. 1887 or as You said a 3rd mod. I bought a real nice one recently for $1500.00 Canadian. and I’ve seen lots in that price range. Good luck

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 384
Member Since:
May 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 2, 2020 - 10:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

If it was military, they should look like thisimage.jpgImage Enlarger

us and a flaming bomb

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 384
Member Since:
May 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 2, 2020 - 10:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Noticed the extra holes in the barrel that may bother some. How’s the bore?

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6394
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 2, 2020 - 10:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Henry Mero said
Winchester did catalogue them as a mod. 1887 

Actually, Henry, it was merely Model 87–& no one has ever been able to figure out where that no. came from or what it meant.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
December 1, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 2, 2020 - 11:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hanzel said
Noticed the extra holes in the barrel that may bother some. How’s the bore?  

Guess those holes aren’t original huh?  

I’m not with the gun and didn’t check the bores on the rifles. I’m going to take better overall pics and check bores the next time we visit. 

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6394
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 2, 2020 - 11:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hanzel said
Noticed the extra holes in the barrel that may bother some. How’s the bore?  

It shouldn’t, much, considering the exceptional condition of the gun otherwise. 

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6394
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 2, 2020 - 11:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said

Guess those holes aren’t original huh?  
   

Probably not, though (since it’s not US issue) it’s conceivable one could have been special ordered that way, just no way to verify that, so most collectors will assume it was done afterwards.  I think I can make out a faint outline of the mark left by a scope block–better to have left them in place.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4
Member Since:
December 1, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
December 2, 2020 - 11:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

[email protected] said

Guess those holes aren’t original huh?  
   

Probably not, though (since it’s not US issue) 

Clarence,

I didn’t think the area where the US and “bomb” should be were depicted in my picture?

Do you think you should be able to see them in the pics I posted?

Avatar
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 384
Member Since:
May 26, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 3, 2020 - 12:40 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

all the marked ones I have seen are all in the same general area, but I can’t say they were all done that way, but to answer your question – the marks aren’t visible in your current pictures

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10856
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
December 3, 2020 - 1:05 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

It is a Model “87” a.k.a. Third variation Winder Musket, and it was manufactured in 1919.  The odds are very high that it is martially marked, but you will need to confirm it.  The value is higher for the Martially marked Model Third variation Winder Muskets if all else is equal.  The barrel has been drilled & tapped for scope blocks, which does negatively affect the value.

Bert

 

Ordnance-stamp-134654.jpgImage EnlargerOrdnance-stamp-135889.jpgImage Enlarger

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1100
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
December 3, 2020 - 2:18 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I didn’t mean to confuse the issue” I should have said “commonly known as a low wall musket” not an ’85 low wall musket.

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4603
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
13
December 3, 2020 - 6:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
It is a Model “87” a.k.a. Third variation Winder Musket, and it was manufactured in 1919.  The odds are very high that it is martially marked, but you will need to confirm it.  The value is higher for the Martially marked Model Third variation Winder Muskets if all else is equal.  The barrel has been drilled & tapped for scope blocks, which does negatively affect the value.

Bert

 

Ordnance-stamp-134654.jpgImage EnlargerOrdnance-stamp-135889.jpgImage Enlarger  

Bert, didn’t you say these were machined from a high wall?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10856
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
December 4, 2020 - 12:21 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

Bert, didn’t you say these were machined from a high wall?  

Yes, they were.  The Third variation Winder Musket is a low-wall in appearance only.  The receiver is threaded for a large shank barrel, whereas a true low-wall is threaded for a small shank barrel.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6394
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
December 4, 2020 - 1:02 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Yes, they were.  The Third variation Winder Musket is a low-wall in appearance only.  The receiver is threaded for a large shank barrel, whereas a true low-wall is threaded for a small shank barrel.  

Other differences too, such as the trigger plate, which I found out the hard way many yrs ago by buying a close-coupled trigger plate which I thought could be installed in a low-wall I was having rebuilt. Gunmith (who was a good one) couldn’t make it work, something about it being too thick & other differences, so had to use the original trigger. 

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: cj57, Chuck, mrcvs, Byron Russell, Marshall, Paul K
Guest(s) 188
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6394
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4603
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4263
Big Larry: 2354
twobit: 2307
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12789
Posts: 111423

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1770
Members: 8876
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation