Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —






— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters




sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_Print sp_TopicIcon
1895 ?
April 2, 2014
1:30 pm
Avatar
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
April 9, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

I just picked up this 1895 serial no 3073. I'd like to take it to Tulsa tomorrow but need some info. It appears to have some upgraded wood that doesn't show on the factory letter. It was sent in for repair 11/24/1897. Would it that have been upgraded at that time? Also could I get a evaluation and a fair value? Sorry for the short notice and thanks in advance

https://imageshack.com/i/n642kdj%5D[Image Can Not Be Found]
https://imageshack.com/i/0ltpk0j%5D[Image Can Not Be Found]
https://imageshack.com/i/nrv2moj%5D[Image Can Not Be Found]
https://imageshack.com/i/0zf6c0j%5D[Image Can Not Be Found]
https://imageshack.com/i/f1vnflj%5D[Image Can Not Be Found]
https://imageshack.com/i/mrwhnsj%5D[Image Can Not Be Found]

April 2, 2014
2:13 pm
Avatar
"road king"
Guests

In my opinion I don't believe it is Winchester wood, no ebony insert in fore stock and the checkering looks to coarse for Winchester. What does the butt plate look like and what caliber is it? Looks like a nice condition flat side???

April 2, 2014
2:56 pm
Avatar
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6
Member Since:
April 9, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The buttplate appears to be correct and the Cal. Is .30.40 krag.

April 2, 2014
4:18 pm
Avatar
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1470
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Early Flatside Forearms don't have the Ebony inlays. That said the wood finish appears to have been re-done or messed with. The checkering doesn't look to be factory. I would think the caliber marking should say 30 U.S. not 30 ARMY. Or at least the barrel is a much later barrel way past a 1897 R&R. But then again you do have double proof marks on the gun. So possibly another R&R took place at a later date. Some of the screws look new and looks like there may have been some re-bluing done. Looks like a nice shooter Flatside.

Those are some things I notice in my humble opinion, granted I'm not an expert. If you want an honest appraisal or fair value, I would post more pics showing more details. With some more overall photos, like the receiver, etc. I'm sure more knowledgeable folks will chim in.

Sincerely,
Maverick

ToolArray-SignatureLowRes-4.jpg

WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!

April 2, 2014
6:56 pm
Avatar
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 185
Member Since:
January 19, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My 1905 says .30US

April 2, 2014
9:25 pm
Avatar
Connecticut
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 139
Member Since:
January 3, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

My 1905 M95 sporting Rifle also says 30 US for what it's worth.

zzzzz348-1.jpg

April 2, 2014
10:32 pm
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Forum Posts: 9529
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The early flat-side Sporting Rifles did indeed have the ebony insert in the forend stock. Winchester made them that way from day one of the Model 1895 production.

I agree that the subject rifle has a number of clues that point towards a non-factory rebuild.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0

Most Users Ever Online: 628

Currently Online: 1873man, sb, Henry Mero, Big Mac, AG
64 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)


Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 16

Topics: 6697

Posts: 53993


Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 904

Members: 8802

Moderators: 4

Admins: 3


Top Posters:

1873man: 4029

twobit: 2484

TXGunNut: 2180

Maverick: 1470

Big Larry: 1377

JWA: 1237

clarence: 1197

Wincacher: 1180

Brad Dunbar: 1069

Chuck: 1055

Navigation