Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Catalogs
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
2
December 12, 2020 - 3:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Any idea on what these have sold for in the past ?

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6364
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
December 12, 2020 - 3:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

That amount would almost pay for a collection of originals, excepting only the first 10 yrs.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 12, 2020 - 6:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

RickC said
Any idea on what these have sold for in the past ?  

Rick,

That has been the going price for a complete set of the Armory Publications set of catalogs for a good number of years now.  I myself prefer to buy the individual reproduction catalogs sold by Cornell Publications.  I have purchased all of them that I do not have an original catalog for.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6364
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
December 12, 2020 - 8:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

  I myself prefer to buy the individual reproduction catalogs sold by Cornell Publications.  I have purchased all of them that I do not have an original catalog for.

Bert  

I’ve bought a couple of their Stevens repros for which there was no alternative available, but Winchester cats have been repro’d going back 50 yrs or more, & these old ones are far higher quality than Cornell’s,, which are all color-copies, not printed on a press.  Can’t find them as easily as Cornell’s, but they come up often on ebay.  Recently bought a 1925 of such quality it could pass for an original, if not marked “repro.”

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
6
December 12, 2020 - 8:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

I’ve bought a couple of their Stevens repros for which there was no alternative available, but Winchester cats have been repro’d going back 50 yrs or more, & these old ones are far higher quality than Cornell’s,, which are all color-copies, not printed on a press.  Can’t find them as easily as Cornell’s, but they come up often on ebay.  Recently bought a 1925 of such quality it could pass for an original, if not marked “repro.”  

Same here Clarence. I have some originals but have also acquired these off eBay.

RickC

37AAC66B-9102-4F07-9EBF-067500B812EB.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 12, 2020 - 8:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I also have several of those older repro Winchester catalogs, and yes, they are better quality the Cornell repro catalogs.  That stated, I have the catalogs for the information they contain within them, not the quality of the physical catalog.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
8
December 12, 2020 - 8:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
I also have several of those older repro Winchester catalogs, and yes, they are better quality the Cornell repro catalogs.  That stated, I have the catalogs for the information they contain within them, not the quality of the physical catalog.

Bert  

Very true Bert. I agree 100%.

RickC

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6364
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
9
December 12, 2020 - 10:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

RickC said

Same here Clarence. I have some originals but have also acquired these off eBay.

RickC

  

Have the same 2 on the left, though I hate the Wolfe’s plastisized covers, which always curl.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4597
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 12, 2020 - 10:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The 12 volume set usually sells for around $600 but …  It doesn’t hurt to make an offer.  I’ve seen them go for way less. This set is comprised of 55 catalogs.  It is way cheaper to have the 12 volume set than pay $15 to $18 for the individual catalogs.  Do the math.  There was a few companies that made reproductions and Cornell doesn’t have all of them.

One way to tell an original is that the pages are stapled together as opposed to the reproductions which are glued.  You could easily spend $600 on just a few of the early originals in very good shape.  I don’t have any originals after 1900 so I am assuming they may be stapled too?

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
11
December 12, 2020 - 11:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’m not really interested in the entire library. Most of the catalogs are repetitive so I usually tried to acquire ones with a change in it such as the 1910 catalog featuring the scope as Clarence knows. Of course I had to have the 1909 to reflect the change so it wasn’t cheap purchasing originals. Damn addiction.

RickC

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4597
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
December 12, 2020 - 11:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

RickC said
I’m not really interested in the entire library. Most of the catalogs are repetitive so I usually tried to acquire ones with a change in it such as the 1910 catalog featuring the scope as Clarence knows. Of course I had to have the 1909 to reflect the change so it wasn’t cheap purchasing originals. Damn addiction.

RickC  

How would you know without at least reading each one first?  I wish I had more.  It would help narrow down when changes actually occurred.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
13
December 12, 2020 - 11:25 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

How would you know without at least reading each one first?  I wish I had more.  It would help narrow down when changes actually occurred.  

Chuck – I have about 30 of the vintage catalogs. Although a rookie it’s not my first rodeo. And I have every catalog from 1950-2005. The later ones obviously have more changes with models.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4597
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
December 12, 2020 - 11:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

RickC said

Chuck – I have about 30 of the vintage catalogs. Although a rookie it’s not my first rodeo. And I have every catalog from 1950-2005. The later ones obviously have more changes with models.  

Since I mostly collect the antique guns I have no interest with most of the post 1900 catalogs.  Best bet for me was the set.  I really won’t spend a lot of money for the pre 1900 originals.  The catalogs are for my reference only.  I’ll spend my money on guns.

Rick, I got to thinking about your post.  I think you missed my point.  All I was saying is that it is impossible a lot of the time to know what catalog may have the “change” you are looking for.  The catalogs don’t always represent the current status.  Eventually the catalogs will catch up with most changes.  My first experience was with the 1897 shotgun.  The March 1897 catalog does not even mention the 1897 shotgun.  The November 1897 catalog does.  Bert will know when the gun actually started being shipped.  There are quite a few questions out there that can be narrowed down by looking at the catalogs. Maybe the post 1900 catalogs are better at keeping up with the changes?   Maybe that is one reason that pre 1900 there were many years where there were multiple catalogs per year? 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
December 13, 2020 - 1:01 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

Since I mostly collect the antique guns I have no interest with most of the post 1900 catalogs.  Best bet for me was the set.  I really won’t spend a lot of money for the pre 1900 originals.  The catalogs are for my reference only.  I’ll spend my money on guns.  

Chuck,

I have the following original post-1900 catalogs, and none of them are stapled;

1. March 1908 No. 74 

2. June 1910 No. 76 

3. January 1913 No. 78 

4. 1918 No. 81 

5. 1925 No. 83

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4597
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
December 13, 2020 - 1:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bert.  My last real one is 8/1899.  So the change happened after this date but before 3/1908.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
17
December 13, 2020 - 1:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

RickC said

Chuck – I have about 30 of the vintage catalogs. Although a rookie it’s not my first rodeo. And I have every catalog from 1950-2005. The later ones obviously have more changes with models.  

Since I mostly collect the antique guns I have no interest with most of the post 1900 catalogs.  Best bet for me was the set.  I really won’t spend a lot of money for the pre 1900 originals.  The catalogs are for my reference only.  I’ll spend my money on guns.

Rick, I got to thinking about your post.  I think you missed my point.  All I was saying is that it is impossible a lot of the time to know what catalog may have the “change” you are looking for.  The catalogs don’t always represent the current status.  Eventually the catalogs will catch up with most changes.  My first experience was with the 1897 shotgun.  The March 1897 catalog does not even mention the 1897 shotgun.  The November 1897 catalog does.  Bert will know when the gun actually started being shipped.  There are quite a few questions out there that can be narrowed down by looking at the catalogs. Maybe the post 1900 catalogs are better at keeping up with the changes?   Maybe that is one reason that pre 1900 there were many years where there were multiple catalogs per year?   

Chuck I found that out the hard way when I was looking for the vintage catalog that introduced the first Winchester scope. I knew it was in the 1909-1912 range so I bought the 1909 & then the 1911. Well wouldn’t you know it was the 1910… at a significant cost.

RickC

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
December 13, 2020 - 1:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said
Thanks Bert.  My last real one is 8/1899.  So the change happened after this date but before 3/1908.  

Chuck,

In regards to your question about the Model 1897, the first guns were assembled and received in the warehouse in early June 1897. 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6364
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
19
December 13, 2020 - 2:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

There are quite a few questions out there that can be narrowed down by looking at the catalogs. Maybe the post 1900 catalogs are better at keeping up with the changes?   Maybe that is one reason that pre 1900 there were many years where there were multiple catalogs per year?   

Surest way of dating changes (without factory records) is advertising in sporting mags & papers like Shooting & Fishing, Forest & Stream, etc.  If a new product was introduced after pub. of the last catalog, the quickest & cheapest method of bringing it before potential customers was an ad in a monthly or weekly pub.

Many of these periodicals are now available on-line, though searching them page by page (the only way to find the ads) requires time & patience.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4322
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
December 13, 2020 - 5:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

There was a 12 volume set advertised in the Fall 2020 WACA mag for $500

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6364
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4597
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2341
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12754
Posts: 111098

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1763
Members: 8850
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation