Log In
December 21, 2006
Offline
Just curious if any one here has info ,(recent sales etc.) on the Mod. 1890 currently offered at R.I.A. lot #3043 ser#2398. As usual here They are touting the engraving and gold plating as factory and being very scepticle I cant tell by the pictures.
W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.
April 30, 2023
Offline
Not a lot of info on the CFM letter… hmmm
October 29, 2011
Offline
Henry–have you asked Pauline M. for her opinion? Bill
December 21, 2006
Offline
No I haven’t, but I will. Actually I wasn’t looking for opinions, I was inquiring if any one had run across this gun in the past.
W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.
June 24, 2015
Offline
If I had to guess, I would say some merely took an 1890 with an R&R on the letter and made a fake ulrich engraved gun. Plated guns are easiest to fake. I do not like the wear and finish. Also, the factory letter in RIAs name is telling. Most of the funny guns have that. If you get my drift…..
December 9, 2002
Offline
Good Points Austin!
With that letter being obvious, or the lack of stating it was engraved at the Factory, I would steer clear of it!
Tony
April 30, 2023
Offline
Slightly off topic, but on any of Ulrich’s previous work, was his name stamped like that? Seems like he would simply engrave it.
December 9, 2002
Offline
Jeremy P said
Slightly off topic, but on any of Ulrich’s previous work, was his name stamped like that? Seems like he would simply engrave it.
Jeremy,
I feel you’re spot on with that comment also, and not off topic at all. I had that same that originally, and didn’t post about it. If you look closely at the stamping, there’s a lighter struck, “J”, partially below the evident “J”.
I think we would need to see, a few examples to compare to, as many of us probably aren’t that familiar, with his signed or stamped examples. IMHO!
Tony
November 7, 2015
Offline
Jeremy P said
Slightly off topic, but on any of Ulrich’s previous work, was his name stamped like that? Seems like he would simply engrave it.
I understand that sometimes he would put a discreet mark on his work but if the info in the description is right they were allowed to sign their work at times. I’m a fan of engraving but certainly no expert. I like this gun and I hope it’s correct.
Mike
December 9, 2002
Offline
Mike,
I also remember that, and like many here have said in the past, it’s certainly one that has to be held and inspected, and after the proper research of information was done to make sure it is possibly all correct. IMHO!
Tony
May 23, 2009
Offline
It looks awfully legit to me. But it certainly wouldn’t hurt to see what Pauline thinks of it.
I don’t recall having seen this one up for auction before, but that doesn’t mean anything either.
Nice looking Model 1890.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
June 24, 2015
Offline
I wouldn’t touch that thing with a 10′ pole. With the considerable wear and pits on the barrel, that gun would have about 20% gold plating remaining at best. I also see pits under the gold in the close up picture of the lower tang. That rifle was engraved and plated in very recent times. People also forget there are plenty of very talented engravers out there today that can engrave anything you want them to.
