We’ve surely discussed this before.
I have more than a few .25-20’s (Winchesters and Marlins). I particularly like this cartridge in a carbine. It’s a fun cartridge and the whole family can enjoy shooting it. With cast lead bullets, it’s very inexpensive to reload.
I was looking at a Winchester 1899 catalog page that featured the .25-20 Winchester M1892 and the .25-20 Marlin. Visually, it appears the cartridges are not the same and I note during that time period, they were not considered interchangeable.
Jim Foral, in his 2001 Gun Digest article, “John Barlow, The Ideal Man” recounts John Barlow and Ideal’s early involvement:
The early 1890’s success of the .25-20 Single Shot as a target and small-game cartridge stirred public interest in the quarter-inch bore and Ideal as kept busy ministering to the wants and needs of the .25-caliber smitten. Barlow’s most valuable contribution was Ideal #25720, a flat-pointed projectile with square grease grooves. In 1892, it stood on the cutting edge of lead bullet design. The basic bullet could be had in a variety of weights ranging from 46-96 grain. Immediately, the 77-grain length became popular. The three dollar Ideal Perfection mould would cast each variation within a single mould and enabled its’ operator to put an end to the 25-caliber keyholing problems encountered by many in those days.
In 1893, Capt. W.L. Carpenter of Sackett’s Harbor, New York, conceptualized a long, parallel-sided 25-caliber target cartridge. Hopeful of attracting gun-maker’s attention, he drew a rough pencil sketch of what he had in mind and managed to get it printed in Forest And Stream that May. After a year of enduring the empty assurances of the people at Winchester, Carpenter turned to the rifleman’s friend. At the Ideal plant, John Barlow fashioned a model shell from brass rod and sent the Captain over to the J. Stevens Arms and Tool Co. With the sample case, and Barlow’s recommendations, he took up the matter with company officials. The availability of Stevens rifles chambered for Carpenter’s 25-25-100 Stevens Straight was announced in mid-August, 1894.
During this 25-caliber craze, Marlin officials wanted a short 25-caliber for a repeating rifle they had in the drawing board stage. At their request, Barlow designed a compacted 25-20 S.S. on the 32-20 WCF case. Marlin adopted the idea and became the first manufacturer to bring out a 25-20 repeater cartridge.
Presently, Winchester unleashed a nearly identical version for their new Model 1892 rifle. Dimensionally similar to the Marlin 25-20, the 25-20 Winchester Center Fire varied enough to preclude interchangeability. The ballistic advantage using smokeless and an 86-grain bullet – 130 fps – belonged to the Marlin edition, but the W.C.F. number became much more accepted. Winchester standardized cartridge and chamber specifications and the 25-20 Marlin faded into obscurity. The proper, popular choice of lead bullets for either case was Ideal’s #25720 in 86 grain weight.
Interesting topic. I have no idea about the 25-20. I have bought a bunch of stuff from Jim over the years. He is one of only 3 major Newton collectors I have ever met. I have a Newton that was passed down in the family. It was the first cartridge I ever loaded and it got me started collecting and reloading.
Steve, you’ve started a great conversation, including information regarding a cartridge and it’s inception as the practical use of this great caliber has and can be enjoyed by many.
Chuck, I’m in you’re category as I didn’t realize this either.
Bert, a great comparison, showing both cartridges in you’re illustration.
Thanks Guy’s,
Tony
I do enjoy the history and the ins and outs of how things turned out as they did. Some of the twists and turns are quite interesting.
I vaguely remembered that early in their production, the Marlin 1894 and the Winchester 1892 did not take the same .25-20 cartridge.
While we’re on the topic, does anyone know if the .38-40 has always been the same cartridge – across Winchester 1892, Marlin 1894, Whitney-Kennedy and Colt Lightning? I have multiple examples of those rifles (well, only one Whitney-Kennedy in .38-40) and I use the same ammunition in all of them interchangeably. But I wonder if there were slight difference across these rifles.
Chuck – I know Jim and yes, he had a lot of Newton rifles (along with Newton loading tools, Newton paper, etc.). He’s also written a lot of great articles. This includes an article on Ross rifles! I very much recommend the Gun Digest articles he’s written. He won the John T. Amber award twice. One was for the, “Lever Bolt Rifle.”
The .32-20 dates to 1882. The .25-20 to 1892. Isn’t the origin of this simply someone necking down a .32-20 to .25-20? I’m surprised it took a decade to happen.
Pop quiz. The Colt 1873 Single Action Army revolver was chambered commonly in .32-20, .38-40, .44-40, and .45 Colt. The Winchester 1892 was chambered in .25-20, .32-20, .38-40, and .44-40. Why was the Colt Single Action Army revolver never chambered in .25-20?
Bonus points: Why was the Winchester 1892 (Winchester production) never chambered in .45 Colt?
November 7, 2015
I have no answer to the pop quiz, Ian. I know the answer to the bonus question but lots of folks disagree with me. The 45 (not LONG) Colt is a straight wall revolver cartridge that is not suitable for the 1892 or 1894 Winchester repeating rifles. I’ve owned a 94 Trapper in 45 Colt, it was pretty sexy but I wouldn’t want to face off even a small band of cranky Comanches with one. Very poor choice for social equipment.
Mike
TXGunNut said
I have no answer to the pop quiz, Ian. I know the answer to the bonus question but lots of folks disagree with me. The 45 (not LONG) Colt is a straight wall revolver cartridge that is not suitable for the 1892 or 1894 Winchester repeating rifles. I’ve owned a 94 Trapper in 45 Colt, it was pretty sexy but I wouldn’t want to face off even a small band of cranky Comanches with one. Very poor choice for social equipment.
The .45 Colt was not chambered in the Model 1892 because of the smaller rim diameter compared to other rounds and the consequent difficulty of extracting the round.
The .25-20 was not chambered in the Colt Single Action Army revolver as it is a bottleneck cartridge with a small diameter bullet and the pressure would be too great—.32 cal and greater are of sufficient diameter to circumvent this problem.
Here’s an interesting thread to read:
https://www.coltforum.com/threads/why-was-the-single-action-army-never-produced-in-25-20.125833/
November 7, 2015
Thanks, Ian. As a result of schooling and encouragement awhile back by our moderator, Bert, I learned a fair bit about the 25-20 SS and repeater cartridges. Both are truly remarkable cartridges. I still get a bit confused with some of the varying nomenclature. Both are underrated cartridges but I was not aware of pressure problems with the WCF cartridge in the Colt revolvers. Someday I hope to explore the 25-20WCF but unless a Single Shot in 25-20SS inexplicably follows me home I’ll be content to enjoy this cartridge vicariously.
Mike
1 Guest(s)