Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
Oklahoma
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
May 24, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 26, 2020 - 3:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have a September? 1959 vintage 220 swift varmint model in pristine condition, except for the last 12-14” of the  barrel.  This region is afflicted by a lot of surface rust like blemishes. The rifle appears to have never been fired.  However, I’m sure this issue seriously impacts the gun’s value.

During this period, were stainless barrels still plated then blued?  Given the overall minty condition of this rifle I am wondering if these barrels are more prone to rust than a normal blued steel barrel?

Thanks

Bill Sturcke - Retired - Ponca City, Oklahoma

Avatar
Winchester, VA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 977
Member Since:
November 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 26, 2020 - 4:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi Bill-

Can you post a photo of the muzzle end of the barrel showing the blemishes?  Sort of like the view below, showing the muzzle face.  This is 220 SWIFT Varmint rifle S/N 450243.  Using the PR dates as published in Rule’s book it would be about June 1959.  Note that the muzzle is pristine “in-the-white” stainless steel, while the barrel exterior is matte finished and blued:

450243-9.jpgImage Enlarger

Looking at my in-progress M70 survey for data on the stainless 243 and 220 SWIFT target weight barrels (varmint and target rifles), the earliest I’ve recorded with smooth finishes (not bead blasted as above) are in the vicinity of S/N 480000 (mid-1960).  By S/N 500000 (December 1960) the polished ones become the predominant barrels on these models.  So I’m guessing that the barrel on your 1959 S/N rifle has the bead blasted matte finish depicted above???

These matte finished barrels were all iron plated and then blued, so surface rust could form on the plating, causing it to flake off the stainless steel leaving patches of white metal (unblued stainless) exposed.  It usually looks like little bits of finish have flaked off (like around the word “SWIFT” in this photo of S/N 450243):

450243-4.jpgImage Enlarger

Fixing this would likely require replating the barrel and rebluing.  The bead blasted matte surface of the stainless steel itself should be undamaged, just exposed when the rusted iron plating flaked off.  So it can be repaired, and is probably worth it for aesthetic purposes if only the barrel was affected.

As for the smooth finished stainless barrels, if you go with Rule’s information, the first batch of polished barrels in 1960 were still iron plated before they were blued using the Du-Lite 3.0 process that would (otherwise) blacken stainless steel.  Presumably these would be subject to the same kind of flaking problem (rust forming in the iron plate layer), since the plating would have protected the underlying stainless from being directly blackened.  I suppose this would apply to the polished stainless barrels on 1960 guns, say rifles in the S/N 480000-500000 range???  Thereafter, the stainless was blackened directly so the blackened surface should be more or less impervious to rust. 

Best,

Lou

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters

WACA-Signauture-3.jpg

Avatar
Oklahoma
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
May 24, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 26, 2020 - 8:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Lou:  This barrel is no exception to your findings.  The photo clearly shows the rash like blemishes on the bead blasted, plated and blued barrel. 

I’m guessing that the Winchester marketing folks strongly believed that shooters weren’t ready for polished “white” stainless steel.

Thanks Lou

191DDD7D-31F4-4CBA-93B2-D47116B5AB44.jpegImage Enlarger

Bill Sturcke - Retired - Ponca City, Oklahoma

Avatar
Winchester, VA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 977
Member Since:
November 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 26, 2020 - 9:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi Bill-

Yup… That’s what happens with these barrels. Cry The speckling is only as deep as the iron plate (the barrel itself is not pitted).  But the stainless steel underneath is “bright” so if you try too hard to remove the surface rust you end up with bare white metal spots.  I’m not sure if there’s a modern stainless steel blackening “product” that would cover up the bare spots well enough or not.

If it doesn’t bother you too much it’d probably be best to leave it alone.  The only “perfect” fix I know of would be to re-plate and re-blue the barrel.  That could probably be done in a way that was undetectable since there’s no pitting underneath, just a little bit of corruption of the iron plate.

Not sure why Winchester wasn’t avant garde enough to embrace bare stainless steel barrels, but they sure went to lengths to blacken them when there was no good way to do it directly… Confused  Worst approach was the “Japanned” finish of the late 1920’s and early 30’s.  Baked on black enamel paint.  It sure was a nice and shiny black when new, but it didn’t wear well at all and the result wasn’t very appealing…  

Best,

Lou

WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters

WACA-Signauture-3.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 329
Member Since:
October 29, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 26, 2020 - 10:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have painted modern stainless Winchester rifles to make them less noticeable when hunting. I even left a silver Leupold scope in place on my .375 H&H when spraying on a camo paint job. Just covered the lenses and painted away. Must have helped since I have hosed a bunch of moose with it.

Shoot low boys. They're riding Shetland Ponies.

Avatar
Oklahoma
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 29
Member Since:
May 24, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 27, 2020 - 4:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Lou – There are no obvious spots where SS Is shining through so I’ll treat it with loving care hoping it will not worsen. As I mentioned, the rest of the rifle is excellent.  It doesn’t bother me at all. Thanks for the informative comments.

Bill Sturcke - Retired - Ponca City, Oklahoma

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Steven Gabrielli
Guest(s) 185
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5055
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12784
Posts: 111359

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8871
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation