Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
New Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 1
Member Since:
November 1, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 1, 2018 - 4:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I have a 1892 lever.  The windchester book says it is a britiain export due to the serial number and where the model 1892 is printed. It is a 25-20 is this a rare gun?  Larry

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1585
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 2, 2018 - 5:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Photos?

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4600
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 2, 2018 - 5:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
I have a 1892 lever.  The windchester book says it is a britiain export due to the serial number and where the model 1892 is printed. It is a 25-20 is this a rare gun?  Larry  

Since you are not a member you have to either join, send them to a member for posting or set up an online siite that can then be transferred to this site.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2303
Member Since:
March 20, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 19, 2018 - 5:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

[email protected] said
I have a 1892 lever.  The windchester book says it is a britiain export due to the serial number and where the model 1892 is printed. It is a 25-20 is this a rare gun?  Larry  

Hello Larry,

In my research survey of the Model 1892 riflesI have found more than 200 rifles with the same upper tang stamp.  Almost all of these are in the U.S. and non have British proof marks.  Does your rifle have “MOD 1892” stamped across the tang just under the hammer?  You might find this interesting based on my work: 

I do have to disagree that the tang marking has anything to do with export of rifles to Britain.   The tang stamp style on your rifle, with or without the small “MOD 1892” stamped across the tang, is found between SN 476000 and 502000.  Roughly 25,000 rifles This corresponds to production from 1909 for the Model 1892.  The earlier guns with the style do not have any MOD 1892 added to the tang whereas the later examples in this range do have it.  Those early gun are indeed lacking any Model designation on them.  The majority of the rifle in this range are sporting rifles in 25-20 WCF caliber.  I have catalogued right at 200 rifles with this tang stamp style and not a single one has any foreign proof stamps!  I know Madis claims the tang style was used for export guns but the data does not support that claim.   

It is interesting to note also that during 1909 this identical tang stamp style was begun to be used on the Model 1890 slide action .22 caliber rifles.  Those rifles already had the Model designation being applied to the barrel so there were no guns produced without model designations.  This style was used until 1915 for the Model 1890’s.  Certainly Winchester did not intend to solely export 6 years worth of 1890 production.

It is my belief that the use of this tang stamp style on the Model 1892 rifles was a production error.  I will be the first to admit that 25,000 rifles with an “error” is a bit hard to believe but the export idea does not make sense either.

What is the serial number of your rifle?  I would love to add it into my work.  Is it a sporting rifle or carbine?  

Thanks so much

Michael

Signature-Pic.jpg

 

Model 1892 / Model 61 Collector, Research, Valuation

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: pdog72, deerhunter
Guest(s) 202
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5055
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2348
twobit: 2303
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12784
Posts: 111359

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8871
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation