Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Whitney- Kennedy
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
March 26, 2014 - 5:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Does anyone have any interest in the Whitney- Kennedy rifles and carbines that had the dream of competing with the Win models 73 &76 in the 1880’s ?
They werent much of a threat , manufacturing about 23,000 in all configurations of their small frame and large frame offerings, Certainly a little cumbersome in appearance, but Pretty well made and possibly even more expensive than a Win 73 at the retail price of $27 ?
Although not abundant , they are occasionally seen in the highest selling 44 cal, usually showing much use. I have a beat up 44 OBR , but recently came across a 32-20 OBR in good shape that is a pretty good shooter. 32-20 was introduced right at the end of the companys diminishing production in 1886 and only about 200 were made, making it fairly scarce. I think an interesting curio in lever gun evolution ?

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
March 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
March 28, 2014 - 3:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I too have an interest in the various Winchester competitors of that era. Many made fine rifles, especially Marlin. But when you compare them side by side you can see why the Winchesters were hard to beat. Strong enough, lite and good handling – at least in my opinion.

I’ve got a couple of Whitney-Kennedys. A small frame later 44-40 Rifle. Sorry about the Smith but its the only picture I have available.

http://s228.photobucket.com/user/rushbgood/media/DSC_07103706_zps9900de14.jpg.html

DSC_07103706_zps9900de14.jpgImage Enlarger

Also an early special order large frame Sporting Rifle in 45-60.

http://s228.photobucket.com/user/rushbgood/media/Misc%20Antique%20Firearms/DSC_6659_zps5e08bd16.jpg.html

DSC_6659_zps5e08bd16.jpgImage Enlarger

http://s228.photobucket.com/user/rushbgood/media/Misc%20Antique%20Firearms/2b5dec1f-b535-4dc5-8824-2950a8c6cc09_zpsb8d9f5b6.jpg.html

2b5dec1f-b535-4dc5-8824-2950a8c6cc09_zpsb8d9f5b6.jpgImage Enlarger

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
March 28, 2014 - 5:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Spike Thanks for pics. I defiantly agree with Winchester being the superior gun (any model) , especially in the appearance department, ( the Kennedy’s initially gave me an impression of an ugly Duckling) Winchesters have had a hold on me since the early 1970’s and my main collecting and shooting interest , but I, enjoy shooting and have been thru phases and gone off on tangents. I am currently enjoying shooting My 32-20 Kennedy. good bore ,good trigger, good accuracy , and something scarce , a little odd and unusual

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Oregon
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 478
Member Since:
September 29, 1993
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 21, 2014 - 7:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

A very lovely specimen! I like these old smoke-poles and have owned several over the years.

WACA Life Benefactor Member

NRA Life Member

Avatar
Steven
Guest
WACA Guest
5
April 23, 2017 - 11:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Whitney-Kennedys 

Hello, this is new to me, but  found this and couldn’t help but reply , I to own a few of those old gals . Just bought one this week end that was found in the walls of a old house being torn down 15 years ago and the fellow just decided to sell it . A later serial number S140 , suppose you’s fellas have Dale Olsen’s book and how the mfg dates translate from the numbers , this one being late fall of 1885 . Anyway , I cleaned it up and put 10 rounds thru it and can not believe the accuracy . Rifling good , bore is a little dark but shoots great . Thanks for the time !

please reply ,     Steve

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6358
TXGunNut: 5018
Chuck: 4596
1873man: 4319
steve004: 4246
Big Larry: 2339
twobit: 2293
mrcvs: 1723
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12743
Posts: 110991

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1763
Members: 8845
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation