Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Lyman 63 tang sight
Avatar
Rex Mahan
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
May 18, 2014 - 7:23 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I just bought a Lyman tang sight stamped "WA". It shows to fit a 63 however if it does you’d have to screw to the rear position into the wood/ stock. Is that how these work?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13080
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
May 18, 2014 - 7:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Rex,

Absolutely NOT ❗

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Guest
Guest
Guests
3
May 18, 2014 - 8:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

WA is for Winchester Model 1903, all calibers Wink
Gene

Avatar
Rex Mahan
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
May 18, 2014 - 8:17 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Book shows it to fit both

Avatar
Guest
Guest
Guests
5
May 18, 2014 - 8:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

What book? Looking in both The Sight Book (Madis) p 153 and Old Gunsights and Rifle Scopes (Stroebel) p. 26 list only the 1903.
Gene

Avatar
Rex Mahan
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
May 18, 2014 - 8:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I’m sorry its not a book that I have it’s a sight application chart. What number does stroebel show for 63?

Aren’t the tangs the same?

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13080
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
May 18, 2014 - 8:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

gene61 said
WA is for Winchester Model 1903, all calibers Wink
Gene

"All calibers" ❓

I think Stroebel was a bit confused.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 13080
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
May 18, 2014 - 8:50 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

gene61 said
What book? Looking in both The Sight Book (Madis) p 153 and Old Gunsights and Rifle Scopes (Stroebel) p. 26 list only the 1903.
Gene

Gene,

In the Lyman chapter, Stroebel omitted the Model 63. If you look in the Marbles chapter, he correctly listed the W8 sight for both the Model 1903 and 63.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Rex Mahan
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 78
Member Since:
May 5, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
May 18, 2014 - 8:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Maybe there’s an early and late version? The screws I gift with the sight included one that was a wood screw

Avatar
Guest
Guest
Guests
10
May 18, 2014 - 9:04 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Stroebel lists the No. 45 receiver sight for both on page 30. I have a 03 but not a 63 so I am unable to compare the two tangs. As Bert points out there is some confusion. 😕
Gene

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4920
Currently Online: dpavlik
Guest(s) 682
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6559
Chuck: 5937
steve004: 5233
1873man: 4715
deerhunter: 2717
Big Larry: 2567
twobit: 2510
mrcvs: 2216
Maverick: 2043
Newest Members:
Harper 1886
Plmggod
Doncarp
navy_ndi
Mmolleck
nosium
Jerry Tharp
John D. Coleman
FelixBacon
KenBinCT
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14876
Posts: 133321

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10104
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation