Log In
December 21, 2006
Offline
Here’s one of those guns/letters that has one scratching ones head. Ser#4665, received in the warehouse before it was ser.#’rd. 1 of a collection of 6 ,’86’s I just purchased.
Question; would this gun qualify as a 1st. year production or not.
W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.
September 19, 2014
Offline
I don’t believe anyone ever said the records were perfect! There were Monday morning hangovers, or something,, that entered into the equation at times. But I DO love the flowing, artistic writing of the record keepers. Tim Oh, yeah, I have one record for an 1873 that was shipped a couple of years before it was made. The letter is annotated “as it appears in the records”!
May 23, 2009
Offline
In these type cases, I always like to see a copy of the ledger page, as you have to remember the Cody Letter is an interpretation of the Researcher tasked with looking up the serial number. They too make mistakes as well. You never know where a ditto mark or something may have been missed.
Sincerely,
Maverick
WACA #8783 - Checkout my Reloading Tool Survey!
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-research-surveys/winchester-reloading-tool-survey/
December 21, 2006
Offline
Maverick I hear Ya’ I did check out the ledger and that’s what it says, just an oversight on the enterer, but a nice oddity none the less
W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.
1 Guest(s)
