Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
1
August 7, 2019 - 6:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I was so happy when I acquired for free two Lyman Disc for my Lyman rear tang sights for a couple of my rifles. The excitement was quickly over when unbeknownst to me, the disc only fit the No. 2 & 2A. My 4 Lyman tang sights are all No. 1’s.

I did find a disc on EBay with a stem. Can anyone tell me if this would fit a No. 1 ?  Photo below.

 BC9386C8-30F6-4278-B750-8F876C0A59F3.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6367
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 7, 2019 - 7:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

AG said
The excitement was quickly over when unbeknownst to me, the disc only fit the No. 2 & 2A. My 4 Lyman tang sights are all No. 1’s.
  

The #1 aperture isn’t threaded to accept a disk–if it were, it wouldn’t be a #1!

I think the stem in your photo can be used on a #1.  William Lyman, by the way, constantly preached in his early ads against the use of eye cups or disks, because he thought they defeated the main advantage his sight offered–an unobstructed field of view.  Only after about a dozen yrs of producing the #1 did he finally cave in to the demand of some shooters for a sight threaded for a disk…and thus the #2 was born.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
3
August 7, 2019 - 10:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thank you Clarence for the info.

Does anyone know the year Lyman No. 2 was introduced. I don’t see any mention of it in Brads sight info prior to 1907. Was hoping pre 1900 which is my collection. 

AG

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 346
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 7, 2019 - 11:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Stroebel’s “Old Gunsights” book says the Lyman #2 combination tang sight was introduced in 1894. 

The #2 in my collection is marked with two patent dates:  Jan. 29, 79, May 6, 84.  It is marked with a W on the bottom of the base which is for an 1873.

Hope that helps.

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
5
August 7, 2019 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hockett said
Stroebel’s “Old Gunsights” book says the Lyman #2 combination tang sight was introduced in 1894. 

The #2 in my collection is marked with two patent dates:  Jan. 29, 79, May 6, 84.  It is marked with a W on the bottom of the base which is for an 1873.

Hope that helps.  

Yes it does Bill.

On the hunt now for a Lyman No. 2 for my M1894 first variation 38-55 DOM 1895. Appreciate the info. 

AG

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6367
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 7, 2019 - 11:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hockett said

The #2 in my collection is marked with two patent dates:  Jan. 29, 79, May 6, 84. 

The ’79 pat. applied to the stem & rotating sleeve; the ’84, to the hinge-joint between the stem & base. No special patent applied to the #2.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
7
August 8, 2019 - 1:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The seller on EBay replied to me &’kindly advised the stem(& disc) he has listed would be too long for my 1894’s. I’ve kinda put this ideal to rest now not knowing for sure if No.2 was produced pre 1900. 

AG

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
8
August 8, 2019 - 2:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I spoke to soon. I contacted Lyman & spoke to technical dept rep. He checked their records & confirmed the No. 2 was first introduced in their factory catalog 1899. Personally that’s good enough for me & happy as I own three 1894’s born in 1899. The chase is back on for a No.2

I was also advised by the Lyman rep, the first Lyman disc sight(No. 15) was introduced in 1887. 

He is scanning the excerpts from their historical data & sending it later today which I will post when received. 

AG

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6367
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
August 8, 2019 - 2:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

AG said
The seller on EBay replied to me &’kindly advised the stem(& disc) he has listed would be too long for my 1894’s.

If it is (though I don’t know how the seller could know without testing it in the sight you have), cut off the extra length!  It’s rare to find one of these stems offered for sale!

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6367
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
August 8, 2019 - 2:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

AG said
I spoke to soon. I contacted Lyman & spoke to technical dept rep. He checked their records & confirmed the No. 2 was first introduced in their factory catalog 1899. Personally that’s good enough for me…  

It shouldn’t be–directing historical questions to the present Lyman management is like asking the Miroku Corp. in Japan for info on Model 52s.  All ANYONE presently working for Lyman knows about the history of the company is what they can find printed in the Lyman Centennial Journal of 1978; an invaluable reference book to be sure, but far from complete.  (It was compiled from Lyman catalogs, but all of them were not available when the research for the book was being done.) The date of 1899 you were given is the date of an illustration printed in the that book; the actual date of introduction was 1894, as determined by the ads Lyman began placing in sporting periodicals at that time.

 

You can acquire your own copy of this book for the ridiculously cheap price of $12:  https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?an=ramage&bi=0&bx=off&cm_sp=SearchF-_-Advtab1-_-Results&ds=30&recentlyadded=all&sortby=17&sts=t&tn=Lyman%20Centennial%20Journal 

Or I’ll sell you my VERY rare hardbound copy for $200.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
11
August 8, 2019 - 3:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I appreciate the reply Clarence. I guess whatever way, it’s confirmed the Lyman No. 2 was introduced pre 1900?

C60B6263-CFB1-4578-9AAA-34BF4CF10609.jpegImage Enlarger7A178977-CD40-40BE-B103-1F802F838706.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6367
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
August 8, 2019 - 3:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

AG said
I appreciate the reply Clarence. I guess whatever way, it’s confirmed the Lyman No. 2 was introduced pre 1900?

  

Certainly.  That page is copied from the Centennial Journal.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
13
August 26, 2019 - 1:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hockett said
Stroebel’s “Old Gunsights” book says the Lyman #2 combination tang sight was introduced in 1894. 

The #2 in my collection is marked with two patent dates:  Jan. 29, 79, May 6, 84.  It is marked with a W on the bottom of the base which is for an 1873.

Hope that helps.  

You’re correct Clarence!

 E5815EDA-E93F-4BCB-9503-934C9A6D2A22.jpegImage Enlarger

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6367
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2343
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12758
Posts: 111123

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8852
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation