Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Sights on my 1896 1894
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 21, 2020 - 11:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I just looked through Brad Dunbar’s thread about sights to see if I could figure out what kind of sights are on my new rifle.

It looks like the front is a sporting front sight, but the rear is different than a sporting rear sight. It is flat across with a V.

Any ideas what I have?IMG_E0543.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0542.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 22, 2020 - 12:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

IMG_0544.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6368
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 22, 2020 - 12:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The nomenclature changed later, but at about this time the catalog was listing TWO “sporting sights,” the semi-buckhorn variety & one called (I wonder why) “flat top sporting sight.”  Later catalogs gave them numbers.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 22, 2020 - 12:25 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Well that makes sense Clarence! Wonder which one is more uncommon. I’m guessing flat.

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 22, 2020 - 12:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

win1894 said
Well that makes sense Clarence! Wonder which one is more uncommon. I’m guessing flat.  

It depends on when your Model 1894 was manufactured. In 1896, it would have not been very common.  By WW I and throughout the 1920s, the Flat-top sporting rear sight was quite common (it was the standard sight on the Model 55).  All that stated, I do not believe that the sight on your rifle is original.  Unless my eyes are deceiving me, I see a screw in the right side of the sight lobe (for adjusting an elevation leaf), and that feature was not available until many years later than 1896.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 22, 2020 - 12:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Well darn Bert! I sure thought my rifle was original. It sure looks like that sight came on that rifle. No sign that anything has been disturbed.

 

Thanks for the info though.

Terry

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
June 22, 2020 - 1:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Terry,

I recommend sending Brad a PM and asking him when the adjustable leaf was added to the Winchester Sporting rear sights.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 56
Member Since:
May 21, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 22, 2020 - 3:13 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi.  The rear sight pictured is probably original, but has had the top cut off.  Easier to see clearly, and faster then then original sight was.

        This was common.   Eric

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1385
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 22, 2020 - 3:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

They cut right through the screw.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
June 22, 2020 - 5:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Upon close inspection of the top of the sight, it does look like it has been filed down.

I have a S&W Model 28, PD marked, that has a similar mod. Filed to keep the edges of the sight from tearing the holster.

Wonder what was removed?

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6368
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
June 22, 2020 - 7:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

win1894 said

Wonder what was removed?  

The “horns” of the buckhorn, which serve no purpose but to obstruct sight of the target.  Filing it down made it a better sight.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4598
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
June 22, 2020 - 7:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Unless my eyes are deceiving me, I see a screw in the right side of the sight lobe (for adjusting an elevation leaf), and that feature was not available until many years later than 1896.

Bert  

The standard sporting rear sight started getting the screw and the leaf in 1887.  The November 1887 catalog shows them.  The edges of the buckhorn were changed too.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10835
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
June 22, 2020 - 8:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Chuck said

Bert H. said

Unless my eyes are deceiving me, I see a screw in the right side of the sight lobe (for adjusting an elevation leaf), and that feature was not available until many years later than 1896.

Bert  

The standard sporting rear sight started getting the screw and the leaf in 1887.  The November 1887 catalog shows them.  The edges of the buckhorn were changed too.  

Interesting… none of my pre-1900 Model 1885 rifles have a screw in the right side of the rear sight lobe.  The serrations on the edges of the buckhorn did not get eliminated for many years after 1900.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
14
June 23, 2020 - 10:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

6891B220-413F-4B5E-8047-F904216973AE.jpegImage Enlarger

This one was on a m1894 made in 1918. Had been on there a long time. As stated above, they use to do that.

RickC

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
June 23, 2020 - 7:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Well that nails it!

But, if that is a sporting rear sight, it has a screw.

The gun letters to November, 1896. Shipped in November 1897. So could the sight, being late in the year, still be the original sight?

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
16
June 23, 2020 - 7:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

win1894 said
Well that nails it!

But, if that is a sporting rear sight, it has a screw.

The gun letters to November, 1896. Shipped in November 1897. So could the sight, being late in the year, still be the original sight?  

No it’s a flat top. Flat tops were commonly used when a tang sight was ordered or installed because they’re lower than the sporting. My 86 ELW’s from 1909 & 1912 both had original rear flat tops with screws. Some flat tops have screws and some don’t. Bob, Bert or Clarence can prob advise when & for what.

RickC

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
June 23, 2020 - 7:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Now I’m getting confused! They say it is a buckhorn sight dehorned. If it was a flat top sight, it would be rare for 1896.

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
18
June 23, 2020 - 7:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

win1894 said
Now I’m getting confused! They say it is a buckhorn sight dehorned. If it was a flat top sight, it would be rare for 1896. But screws didn’t start till 1897.  

Sorry win1894 let me go back in & read the entire thread again. Been a few days.

RickC

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
19
June 23, 2020 - 7:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

[The standard sporting rear sight started getting the screw and the leaf in 1887.  The November 1887 catalog shows them.  The edges of the buckhorn were changed too.]

Ok just re-read the thread. A better photo of your rear sight from back to front would help but it appears original to me and the same as the ones I’ve had. If Chuck is correct on the 1887 date & it includes the flat top, there’s no reason to think it’s not original.

RickC

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 86
Member Since:
June 15, 2007
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
June 23, 2020 - 8:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

What strikes me is the consistency of the finish and wear on the sight. Matches the gun.IMG_0548.JPGImage EnlargerIMG_0549.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

WACA #11669

NRA Distinguished Life Member

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: Roundsworth, Maverick, 33wcf, Big Larry, Erin Grivicich, TR, Arrowhead1976
Guest(s) 162
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6368
TXGunNut: 5034
Chuck: 4598
1873man: 4322
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2344
twobit: 2295
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12759
Posts: 111131

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1766
Members: 8853
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation