Log In
Members
Home
Add Reply
Add Topic
Offline
steve004 said
I wish this one fit a Winchester:
What is the application code on the underside of the base?
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
steve004 said
I wish this one fit a Winchester:
Don’t you have an electric drill?
clarence said
steve004 said
I wish this one fit a Winchester:
Don’t you have an electric drill?
Lol! His name is Steve, not bubba!
A man can never have too many WINCHESTERS...
Bert H. said
steve004 said
I wish this one fit a Winchester:
What is the application code on the underside of the base?
No code on the underside of the base. I bought the sight originally as it was advertised as a No. 103. It is not. It took me a while to figure it out what it is. Does anyone recognize it right off? Hole spacing is Stevens:
steve004 said
Does anyone recognize it right off? Hole spacing is Stevens.
Lyman 144 made specially for the Walnut Hill model.
clarence said
steve004 said
Does anyone recognize it right off? Hole spacing is Stevens.
Lyman 144 made specially for the Walnut Hill model.
You got it Clarence! I don’t think anyone is surprised 
And yes, I do have a drill, but somehow I feel reluctant to use it 
steve004 said
I wish this one fit a Winchester:
Steve, I have one currently on my 1916 vintage M1894 in 38-55 cal. I don’t know the code without taking it off the rifle, but the code is correct for this rifle. It is a nice one with correct aperture. Pretty expensive, I think I paid $700 for it. Let me know if you can use it and I will pull it off the rifle and check the number. Big Larry
Big Larry said
steve004 said
I wish this one fit a Winchester:
Steve, I have one currently on my 1916 vintage M1894 in 38-55 cal. I don’t know the code without taking it off the rifle, but the code is correct for this rifle. It is a nice one with correct aperture. Pretty expensive, I think I paid $700 for it. Let me know if you can use it and I will pull it off the rifle and check the number. Big Larry
Larry,
If it is correct for a Model 1894 in 38-55, it has a “D” code. If it has a “DA” code, it was made for a Model 1894 in 25-35 WCF, 30 WCF, or 32 WS. I have never seen a Lyman 103 with a “D” application code.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
I will pull it off and check the letter. I am quite sure it will be a “D” as I bought it specifically for that 1916 M1894 38-55. I really don’t care for the sight, so I thought about selling it. I have never shot this rifle. Too nice. Big Larry
Big Larry said
I will pull it off and check the letter. I am quite sure it will be a “D” as I bought it specifically for that 1916 M1894 38-55. I really don’t care for the sight, so I thought about selling it. I have never shot this rifle. Too nice. Big Larry
If it’s a 103, I think such a TARGET sight on any lever gun, pump-action plinker, etc, is as inapt as Formula 1 racing airfoils on street cars. Of course, it doesn’t “hurt,” but the windage adjustment on a hunting rifle is something that generally needs to be done only once for a given load, & then (if the shooter is smart), left alone. Even on the true target rifles I shoot, like 52s & M1922s, I never change windage after it’s once set. On top of that, I think standard tang sights LOOK better mounted on the gun.
clarence said
Big Larry said
I will pull it off and check the letter. I am quite sure it will be a “D” as I bought it specifically for that 1916 M1894 38-55. I really don’t care for the sight, so I thought about selling it. I have never shot this rifle. Too nice. Big Larry
If it’s a 103, I think such a TARGET sight on any lever gun, pump-action plinker, etc, is as inapt as Formula 1 racing airfoils on street cars. Of course, it doesn’t “hurt,” but the windage adjustment on a hunting rifle is something that generally needs to be done only once for a given load, & then (if the shooter is smart), left alone. Even on the true target rifles I shoot, like 52s & M1922s, I never change windage after it’s once set. On top of that, I think standard tang sights LOOK better mounted on the gun.
I will confess I have a thing for fancy sights. That, “thing” pushes me to overlook some of the pragmatic objections. Also, these days, it’s paper targets that appear in my sights.
clarence said
steve004 saidI will confess I have a thing for fancy sights.
clarence said
steve004 saidI will confess I have a thing for fancy sights.
They don’t look ideal for the close range brush hunting I grew up with … Well, maybe a long shot across a hayfield…
Back to OP…. the NIP Lyman #5 combination sight has 3+ hours to go and is currently at $390…. I’m still saying around $500. I do have a nagging voice in the back of my head say it may go over $600.
$492. at the hammer drop. Now to try to find a stash of them hidden in the parts drawers in the back room of a longtime gun shop that “shifted” their focus to “black guns” about 20 years ago… wouldn’t be the first time something like it has happened.
Online
Ben said
Back to OP…. the NIP Lyman #5 combination sight has 3+ hours to go and is currently at $390…. I’m still saying around $500. I do have a nagging voice in the back of my head say it may go over $600.
Ben nailed it!
The winning bidder got the sight for $492 + shipping, but that bidder also had placed two bids ABOVE his own winning bid. I’m fairly sure a $500 bid would not have won that sight against the winning bidder. Goes to show it’s all about condition, condition, and condition.
BRP
1 Guest(s)
