Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Lyman tang peep markings
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 216
Member Since:
March 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 11, 2015 - 5:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Any of you guys know roughly when Lyman began stamping Lyman Middlefield, Conn. on the top of their tang peeps. The early ones were unmarked as far as I know, just wondering when they changed?

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 11, 2015 - 6:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think this is the same marking you are talking about discussed here.  Maybe someone else can narrow down the dates.

https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-sights/lyman-tang-sight-question-1/

 

Brad

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 216
Member Since:
March 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 12, 2015 - 4:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yeah, those are the markings I’m referring to. I figured some of the sight collectors might know when the sights started being marked Lyman Middlefield Conn. on top. The sight I’m asking about is actually for a Savage 99 but I figured the marking change would’ve been across the whole line of tang sights.

I have a high condition 99H takedown with two leaf folding sight on the barrel and found a minty Lyman to mount on it. It has a high polish which leads me to believe it is older production but it also has the marking mentioned. My T/D is a 1914 gun and I wanted a period correct sight on it. Thanks for the reply.

Avatar
Moderator
Moderator
Forum Posts: 960
Member Since:
December 30, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 12, 2015 - 5:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I put one on this 1899H from 1915, a Lyman No.1A.  This one is unmarked, but it would not surprise me if there were sights with the tang markings by then.  I just don’t know exactly when they changed or maybe there was a transition period.  I’m not overly concerned about it on this rifle personally but I can see someone wanting to get the correctly marked one.

Brad

DSCN5742a.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Regards

Brad Dunbar

http://1895book.com/

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 216
Member Since:
March 19, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 12, 2015 - 7:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Just being fussy, I guess. Your sight looks good and the finish matches the rifle. That is more important.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6361
TXGunNut: 5026
Chuck: 4597
1873man: 4321
steve004: 4250
Big Larry: 2341
twobit: 2294
mrcvs: 1726
TR: 1722
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12752
Posts: 111065

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1763
Members: 8849
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation