Avatar
Please consider registering
Guest
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Register Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
1895 Winchester rear sight
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 137
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 25, 2021 - 8:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

I have an 1895 Winchester 30 gov’t 06 SN 93657 B. It is fitted with a Lyman 21 receiver sight and also a Lyman folding rear sight I doubt the rear sight is original to the gun. I would appreciate your thoughts based on the attached photos. Don

P1020820.JPGImage EnlargerP1020821.JPGImage EnlargerP1020822.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1258
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 25, 2021 - 8:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

The Lyman 21 receiver sight possesses a patina incongruent with the bluing of the receiver, strongly suggesting it is a later addition.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 4553
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
September 25, 2021 - 10:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

mrcvs said
The Lyman 21 receiver sight possesses a patina incongruent with the bluing of the receiver, strongly suggesting it is a later addition.  

Maybe, but compare it with the finish on the bottom & sides of the mag–not too dissimilar.  Sticking out on the side of the rcvr would expose it to more handling & also protect the finish on the rcvr.  Even if it’s aftermarket, I’d rather have a ’95 with a non-original 21 than the same gun with only the open sights.

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 3984
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 26, 2021 - 4:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Nice gun. A folding rear sight makes sense with a receiver sight and I would expect to see varying amounts of wear on the different parts of a rifle that has seen a fair bit of use as this one has. Removing the sight and examining the receiver and back side of the sight may provide better clues.

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 675
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 28, 2021 - 3:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

I believe the rear folding sight is from later time period production.  Should have a Lyman #6 to be time period correct.  An easy fix.  RDB

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 137
Member Since:
March 15, 2020
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
September 28, 2021 - 4:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Roger, I too thought a Lyman 6 was proper but the only caveat would be that with a serial no in 93000s would this have made a Lyman 16 proper? With my limited knowledge I believe it is fitted with a Lyman 16. Also the rear of the receiver sight bears the code WR which makes it intended for a model 1895. Any additional thoughts will be appreciated. Don

Avatar
Santa Clara, CA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 675
Member Since:
January 27, 1992
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
October 3, 2021 - 2:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

According to the “Old Gunsights” book, the #16 was introduced in 1955. Thus, my conclusion of the later production period for the sight.  RDB

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5264
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
October 3, 2021 - 3:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

 Removing the 21 and look if there is nice blue under it. That would be the evidence that a 21 was on the gun from day one.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 438
Member Since:
September 19, 2014
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
9
October 3, 2021 - 7:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost
sp_ReportPost

Folks, model 21 sights often can be elevated all the way to provide a view of the protected area of the receiver plus the back side of the sight itself.  Easier and less chance of damage to screws by the unwary, etc.  Most likely if the sight or one like it was on from an early time, there will be a nicely blue “shadow” under the sight.  My take, at least.  Tim

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
1873man: 5264
clarence: 4553
TXGunNut: 3984
Chuck: 3664
steve004: 3281
twobit: 2865
Maverick: 2036
JWA: 1862
Big Larry: 1808
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 10630
Posts: 91744

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1471
Members: 11706
Moderators: 3
Admins: 3
Navigation