Log In
Register
Members
Home
Add Reply
Add Topic
Topic RSS
QuoteJeff,
Right you are, and the additional information in the patent text makes that much clearer… thanks for straightening me out on this.
Bert
WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
2:24 am
July 17, 2012
Offline
Bert H. said
Jeff,Right you are, and the additional information in the patent text makes that much clearer… thanks for straightening me out on this.
Bert
Hi Bert,
I was not trying to straighten anyone out, I was just trying to prevent duplicate effort since I had already searched ALL of the patents issued on that date several years ago to find that patent. FWIW, it was the only patent issued to Winchester on that date and the only patent related to firearms.
Best Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
4:52 am
April 15, 2005
Offline
RickC said
Is it confirmed the elevators without a patent date are aftermarket & not original?RickC
No… not exactly. It all depends on which specific Winchester Model you find an unmarked elevator on.
WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
2:55 pm
November 1, 2013
Offline
Bert H. said
No… not exactly. It all depends on which specific Winchester Model you find an unmarked elevator on.
So you see, Rick, the only positively sure way to escape this uncertainty is to knock out the rear sight & replace it with a tang sight, as any expert rifleman would have done!
Most Users Ever Online: 628
Currently Online: impalacustom, Thomas Beckwith, Jose Sandoval
54 Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 16
Topics: 9151
Posts: 78838
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1234
Members: 10617
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Newest Members:
Jose Sandoval, Paul Martin, Charles Pekor, Roger Stockbridge, Rex Boehler, Northwoodneil, Eric Reaves, James Leeper, Roger Burke, DALE FLINNAdministrators: admin: 4, Mike Hager: 169, Bert H.: 11835
