Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester proof mark?
Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 19, 2025 - 1:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

?Whitney Tiesing Model Kennedy .38-40 Rifle – Manufactured 1882 - 9 of 15Image Enlarger

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6395
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
June 19, 2025 - 3:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Does look a little out of place. Most likely an interesting story about how it got there. 

 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Maverick
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2023
Member Since:
May 23, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 19, 2025 - 3:20 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

On February 8th, 1888 Winchester purchased the Whitney Arms Company and sold of the remaining stock of Whitney rifles. It stands to reason that possibly they still had some on hand until after 1905 and sold them. That at that time they were proof marked after proof firing them before leaving the factory.

Or even more likely possibly someone having known that Whitney was bought out by Winchester. Sent the rifle back to Winchester for repair and Winchester repaired it with parts still on hand or made the parts, and then proofed the rifle before returning to the customer. 

All the Whitney rifles were chambered for the same calibers as the Model 73 & 76 Winchester. 

I’ve never seen any but supposedly some of the late production Whitney rifles were assembled and sent out with Winchester marked barrels. I have no idea what those markings consist of but assume the standard Winchester barrel address. 

Sincerely,

Maverick

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 19, 2025 - 5:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Maverick said
On February 8th, 1888 Winchester purchased the Whitney Arms Company and sold of the remaining stock of Whitney rifles. It stands to reason that possibly they still had some on hand until after 1905 and sold them. That at that time they were proof marked after proof firing them before leaving the factory.

Or even more likely possibly someone having known that Whitney was bought out by Winchester. Sent the rifle back to Winchester for repair and Winchester repaired it with parts still on hand or made the parts, and then proofed the rifle before returning to the customer. 

All the Whitney rifles were chambered for the same calibers as the Model 73 & 76 Winchester. 

I’ve never seen any but supposedly some of the late production Whitney rifles were assembled and sent out with Winchester marked barrels. I have no idea what those markings consist of but assume the standard Winchester barrel address. 

Sincerely,

Maverick

  

Interesting information and theories.  This particular rifle dates to 1882, so should have been long gone from the factory by the time Winchester took over.  So, perhaps it’s an example of having been sent to Winchester for repair in 1888 or after.  Intriguing.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12840
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
June 19, 2025 - 5:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

Maverick said

On February 8th, 1888 Winchester purchased the Whitney Arms Company and sold of the remaining stock of Whitney rifles. It stands to reason that possibly they still had some on hand until after 1905 and sold them. That at that time they were proof marked after proof firing them before leaving the factory.

Or even more likely possibly someone having known that Whitney was bought out by Winchester. Sent the rifle back to Winchester for repair and Winchester repaired it with parts still on hand or made the parts, and then proofed the rifle before returning to the customer. 

All the Whitney rifles were chambered for the same calibers as the Model 73 & 76 Winchester. 

I’ve never seen any but supposedly some of the late production Whitney rifles were assembled and sent out with Winchester marked barrels. I have no idea what those markings consist of but assume the standard Winchester barrel address. 

Sincerely,

Maverick

  

Interesting information and theories.  This particular rifle dates to 1882, so should have been long gone from the factory by the time Winchester took over.  So, perhaps it’s an example of having been sent to Winchester for repair in 1888 or after.  Intriguing.

  

It would have been sent to Winchester after July 1905 to have those proof marks on it.  Personally, I have serious doubts that Winchester would have “R & R’d” and proofed that rifle.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
June 19, 2025 - 6:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

The proof marks don’t appear faked to me.  I also note the rifle is not being promoted as having any additional value with the Winchester markings – the seller doesn’t even mention it.

Avatar
Jeremy P
The Great State
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 886
Member Since:
April 30, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 19, 2025 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Pretty fair price for that I think. Interesting stamps and valid theories….

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 19, 2025 - 10:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Jeremy P said
Pretty fair price for that I think. Interesting stamps and valid theories….

  

The .38-40 is fairly rare in the Whitney-Kennedy with the .44-40 being vastly more common.  

The upper tang has been broken and welded up.  I’m doubting Winchester did this.  But I’ve been wrong before.

Avatar
1892takedown
South Texas
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1098
Member Since:
March 20, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
June 19, 2025 - 11:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Im not familiar with Whitney Kennedy’s and for what its worth, I can see no added value to the rifle.  The caliber markings and the indexing mark appear the same as on others, and the barrel appears to be a WK barrel.  The WP proof mark does not look unlike other proofs as found on other Win models circa the early 1900’s.  It also looks like they’ve been there on the barrel/receiver for an extremely long time, not contrast from the existing condition.  Without throwing the baby out with the bath water, Id chalk up the “why” to just another unanswered Winchester question or anomaly and move on down the road. 

Thanks for the break from work Steve.      

DSC_0245-Copy-3.JPG

1892takedown @sbcglobal.net ......NRA Endowment Life Member.....WACA Member

"God is great.....beer is good.....and people are crazy"... Billy Currington

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6395
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
11
June 20, 2025 - 2:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good eye, Steve. Most folks would not have taken notice of this little anomaly. Will be interesting to see if any more WK’s turn up with these proof marks. 

 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
June 20, 2025 - 2:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory

TXGunNut said
Good eye, Steve. Most folks would not have taken notice of this little anomaly. Will be interesting to see if any more WK’s turn up with these proof marks. 

 

Mike

  

Mike –

I talked to a fellow Whitney-Kennedy/Burgess collector yesterday and brought up this topic.  He’s collected these rifles for 50 some years.  Somewhere around 15 years ago he, myself and a couple other long-time Whitney-Kennedy collectors (including Dale Olson who wrote the book on the 1878 Burgess Long Range Rifle) put on a large display at the NRA Trophy Show in Dallas, Texas.  Maybe you were there and saw the display?  Unfortunately, there’s only two of us from that group that remain alive – and a tremendous amount of knowledge has been lost.  I don’t recall anyone from that group had a Whitney-Kennedy rifle with Winchester proofs on it.  When I asked Warren yesterday, he said it seemed that years ago he had maybe heard of a W-K rifle with Winchester marks but had never seen actually seen an example.  So… it’s hard for me to imagine this example is part of a greater theme.

Here’s a picture from that display.  That’s Lew Steadman to the right.  He also was a very long-term Whitney-Kennedy/Burgess collector and had a large collection.  After he passed, it took Amoskeag four separate auctions to sell it all.  He had prototypes, engraved rifles, rare variations, high condition rifles, etc. etc.  

View post on imgur.com

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5155
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
June 20, 2025 - 3:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

I just remembered Mark’s excellent video on Whitney-Kennedy rifles:

t=3s

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6395
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
14
June 20, 2025 - 4:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Good eye, Steve. Most folks would not have taken notice of this little anomaly. Will be interesting to see if any more WK’s turn up with these proof marks. 

 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Bert H., win4575, Mark Douglas, TXGunNut, Rick C, UpInTheBigTrees
Guest(s) 182
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6395
Chuck: 5799
steve004: 5155
1873man: 4691
deerhunter: 2692
Big Larry: 2546
twobit: 2491
mrcvs: 2189
Maverick: 2023
Newest Members:
Diego
Bkmkok
Leonardb
Skysquatch82
cdavis5705
jj95
DWill01
Joe Bang
pew pew
Longrangesniper
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14687
Posts: 131406

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 9967
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation