Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Model 1885 low wall vs high wall
Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12931
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
41
December 11, 2020 - 1:29 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

clarence said

HOW the customer would specify which frame size, with no identification provided by catalogs or ads, is exactly the problem.  As I said, a customer could describe in his own words what he wanted, but that’s a clumsy way to go about it.  

After reviewing all of the Winchester catalogs from November 1885 through the 1900 catalog, it appears the frame size provided was determined by Winchester when the specific cartridge and barrel size were ordered.  Winchester clearly specific what barrel sizes were available for all of the standard cartridges offered.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
clarence
NY
Member
Restricted
Forum Posts: 7119
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
42
December 11, 2020 - 1:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

After reviewing all of the Winchester catalogs from November 1885 through the 1900 catalog, it appears the frame size provided was determined by Winchester when the specific cartridge and barrel size were ordered.  Winchester clearly specific what barrel sizes were available for all of the standard cartridges offered.  

No doubt that’s the way it was usually done–but that means it was the factory & not the customer who was doing the deciding.  Which still leaves unexplained the mystery of the .38-56 & .40-65 LWs.

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12931
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
43
December 11, 2020 - 1:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

clarence said

No doubt that’s the way it was usually done–but that means it was the factory & not the customer who was doing the deciding.  Which still leaves unexplained the mystery of the .38-56 & .40-65 LWs.  

Those two rifles were undoubtedly uniquely special ordered by the customer.  I suspect that the order was worded something like, “I want a Single Shot rifle in 38-56 WCF that is as light as can possibly be made”.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
mrcvs
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2202
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
44
December 11, 2020 - 2:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Bert H. said

I suspect that the order was worded something like, “I want a Single Shot rifle in 38-56 WCF that is as light as can possibly be made”.

I bet the odds are that it happened exactly this way.  GREAT hypothesis, Bert!  No mention of low wall vs high wall but instead, the desire for a lighter rifle.

Avatar
steve004
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5189
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
45
December 11, 2020 - 2:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

mrcvs said

Bert H. said
I suspect that the order was worded something like, “I want a Single Shot rifle in 38-56 WCF that is as light as can possibly be made”.

I bet the odds are that it happened exactly this way.  GREAT hypothesis, Bert!  No mention of low wall vs high wall but instead, the desire for a lighter rifle.  

The .38-56 in question, had as I recall, a factory letter.  I have the shadow of a memory that there was some mention in the letter of the customer’s desire for light weight?  

Avatar
Bert H.
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12931
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
46
December 11, 2020 - 3:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

steve004 said

The .38-56 in question, had as I recall, a factory letter.  I have the shadow of a memory that there was some mention in the letter of the customer’s desire for light weight?    

The factory letter does not make any mention of “light weight”.

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
TXGunNut
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6423
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
47
December 11, 2020 - 4:28 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print

Interesting thread. In today’s mass-produced world I’m fascinated by a big company that produced items made to order and quite often one of a kind. I’m starting to understand why Bert is still fascinated by the 1885 after all these years. It’s a shame so many records we’d love to see were used to heat the factory (and workers) we revere today. 

To address the OP I suspect the options selected helped determine the frame type. In my business I love a customer that knows exactly what he wants and I will make every effort to accommodate him. I suspect the folks who processed custom orders felt the same way. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Board Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Mark Douglas, tim tomlinson, Byron Russell, Jeremy P, Blue Ridge Parson, kevindpm61
Guest(s) 110
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6423
Chuck: 5840
steve004: 5189
1873man: 4701
deerhunter: 2705
Big Larry: 2551
twobit: 2497
mrcvs: 2202
Maverick: 2040
Newest Members:
Reddogdefense
JUSTME3275
win70pre64
Danrr
GTUDEAN
rbrettallen
mattawoman
Brad
RUSS
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14774
Posts: 132136

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2057
Members: 10022
Moderators: 3
Admins: 4
Administrators: Mike Hager, Bert H., JWA, SethJ
Moderators: Rob Kassab, Brad Dunbar, Heather
Navigation