Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester Model 1873 SRC with cut dovetail for front sight
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 100
Member Since:
March 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
June 16, 2024 - 1:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hey Forum members 

Came across a gun at a show the other day and was curious if someone could give some insight on how rare a saddle ring carbine is with an ordered rifle butt and  a cut dovetail for the front sight ? IMG_5968.jpegImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

Aim Small ,Miss Small

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
June 16, 2024 - 3:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

It is rare but not unheard of. I have come across three consecutive carbines that letter with Globe sights and another one with a Lyman hunting front in the ledgers. A rifle stock is not rare.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 100
Member Since:
March 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
June 16, 2024 - 3:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bob 

would these sights on this carbine be the same as a rifle ? Do you have pictures of a examples that would be on this carbine , thanks in advance 

Bruce 

Aim Small ,Miss Small

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 390
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
June 16, 2024 - 3:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

bhutch said
Thanks Bob 

would these sights on this carbine be the same as a rifle ? Do you have pictures of a examples that would be on this carbine , thanks in advance 

Bruce 

  

I’m not Bob but I can answer that the sights mentioned here would have been standard.  Possibly a different height for the Rocky Mountain front sight.  The sporting rear sight pictured here is from a later catalog.  In 1887 it would not have had the adjustment screw.

Do you have photos of the carbine?  

RockyMtn.jpgImage EnlargerSporting-rear.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 390
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
June 16, 2024 - 3:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Here are a couple of photos of original Rocky Mountain front and Sporting rear sights in my collection.  The Rocky Mountain was offered in different heights.

s-1961.jpgImage Enlargersporting10.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 11553
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
June 16, 2024 - 4:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hockett said
Here are a couple of photos of original Rocky Mountain front and Sporting rear sights in my collection.  The Rocky Mountain was offered in different heights.

s-1961.jpgImage Enlargersporting10.jpgImage Enlarger

  

Bill,

What is the height on the R.M. sight you have?  I have been looking for one to put back on one of my high-wall Single Shot rifles (CAL. 40-70 SHARPS STR.)

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
June 16, 2024 - 4:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Those carbines I saw in the ledgers and not physically so I can’t answer that. Like Bill stated the Rocky Mt came in different heights. I would guess on a carbine which has a small muzzle diameter would need a taller front or a shorter rear. 

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 100
Member Since:
March 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
June 16, 2024 - 4:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Would it not have to be an early first model 73 sporting rear sight , that is shorter on the shank ? I compared one of these sights above with a 73 carbine in my collection and it seems way to long and won’t fit properly?

thanks for feedback guys

Bruce 

Aim Small ,Miss Small

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1784
Member Since:
June 4, 2017
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
June 16, 2024 - 4:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

 I like the letter, it is rare and interesting. If your gun does not have the original sights finding the correct color, fit, height, and condition will be hard. Then it will require shooting. The gun is special order originally, the front sight might have been trimmed to fit the smaller round barrel of a carbine. They did make rocky mountain model 79 sights with the blade set lower on base. The E, F, and K were set down to .075″.

 If it’s sights aren’t original it is worth the time and money to make it right. T/R

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 390
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
June 16, 2024 - 5:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

bhutch said
Would it not have to be an early first model 73 sporting rear sight , that is shorter on the shank ? I compared one of these sights above with a 73 carbine in my collection and it seems way to long and won’t fit properly?

thanks for feedback guys

Bruce w

  

Bruce,

By 1887 the short base sight had been out of the catalog for three years.  Of course the words “always” and “never” don’t fit well in Winchester collecting.  I’m attaching photos of my November 1887 vintage 1873 sporting rifle with standard sights.  It has sporting front and rear sights.  Note the rear sight is the long base variation without the adjustment screw.  This sight first showed up in the January 1884 catalog.  I would expect that by 1887 the early short base variations had been used up.  However, re-read sentence two above.

Where is the dovetail located on your carbine?  Sometimes Winchester reversed the rear sights on shorter barreled guns so the dovetail may be closer to the receiver and barrel junction. 

Bill

SN252806-01.jpgImage EnlargerSN252806-02.jpgImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 390
Member Since:
July 31, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
June 16, 2024 - 5:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

Bill Hockett said

Here are a couple of photos of original Rocky Mountain front and Sporting rear sights in my collection.  The Rocky Mountain was offered in different heights.

s-1961.jpgImage Enlargersporting10.jpgImage Enlarger

  

Bill,

What is the height on the R.M. sight you have?  I have been looking for one to put back on one of my high-wall Single Shot rifles (CAL. 40-70 SHARPS STR.)

  

Bert,

The Rocky mountain I have has a .090″ base and is .364″ high.  It probably has some wear but I don’t see pitting or file marks.  It is closest to what Madis calls a 79C.  These are tough to find with any kind of condition.

Bill

I call myself a collector as it sounds better than hoarder

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
June 16, 2024 - 5:55 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

bhutch said
Would it not have to be an early first model 73 sporting rear sight , that is shorter on the shank ? I compared one of these sights above with a 73 carbine in my collection and it seems way to long and won’t fit properly?

thanks for feedback guys

Bruce 

  

Bruce,

Pictures of the wear patterns on the barrel might give you a insight as to what sight was on it.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7114
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
June 16, 2024 - 6:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said A rifle stock is not rare.

Not rare, but stupid, as the best thing about carbines, other than reduced wt, is the user-friendly buttplate.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 100
Member Since:
March 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
June 16, 2024 - 7:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

The gun in question,  I don’t own yet, and just saw it at a show ,

It did have the early first model sporting rear sight on it . But the gun was  in rougher condition as most of these carbines were.

Most of you mentioned  that sight was discontinued . Maybe a sporting rear sight installed backwards? 

I do think the sights lettering are the real scare option as Bob said .

I appreciate  all the insight  on the topic . 

thanks Bruce 

Aim Small ,Miss Small

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
June 16, 2024 - 7:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Only 4.5% of the guns letter with sights.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 100
Member Since:
March 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
June 17, 2024 - 10:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

 Bob ,

4.5% of the 73 rifles ? Or Carbines? Or a  combination of both?

I would think that a carbine with sights on the letter especially with a front sight dovetail cut is a rarity? 
thanks again Bob and everyone else leaving feedback!

Aim Small ,Miss Small

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
June 17, 2024 - 1:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bruce,

4.5% of all 73’s

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 100
Member Since:
March 12, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
June 17, 2024 - 8:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said
Bruce,

4.5% of all 73’s

Bob

  

Bob , what was the total number or percentage of carbines made compared to rifles and muskets?

thanks Bruce 

Aim Small ,Miss Small

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4464
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
June 17, 2024 - 10:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bruce,

The breakdown of rifles, carbines and muskets is 79.6%, 17.7% and 2.7% respectively.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Melbourne Australia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 211
Member Since:
July 14, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
June 17, 2024 - 11:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bruce, can you get pics of this SRC? Would be interesting to see it 

A man can never have too many WINCHESTERS...

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: mrcvs
Guest(s) 188
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7114
TXGunNut: 5575
Chuck: 4993
steve004: 4662
1873man: 4464
Big Larry: 2447
twobit: 2348
mrcvs: 1946
TR: 1784
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 13465
Posts: 118854

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1895
Members: 9271
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation