Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester M70, 1948(?), am I missing anything?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 22
Member Since:
August 9, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
August 21, 2024 - 5:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Hello,

I picked this up recently as a project based on some bad auction pictures and now that I have it in hand I think its rather nice, kind of a window back into the golden era of hunting…like it was set up when purchased and then left that way for the next 75 years.

Anyways, I don’t think its anything particularly special being its very common 30-06 caliber, added recoil pad, 22G rear sight that’s been (competently) machined down to fit the scope, missing front sight hood, and the worn finish on the stock. 

The glass is trashed as well, but that’s easily fixable.

with the stock removed, the barrel is stamped “1906” and “48”

As a package it does speak to me.

I think its just outside the transitional serial number range, and according to my research, a typical type III.

Anything I’m missing? Or anything that’s missing that I’m missing?

 

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Avatar
Ohio
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 27
Member Since:
August 8, 2024
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 21, 2024 - 11:54 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

No, You have what I believe is the best hunting rifle in the World.   Put a 2-7 Leupold  on it . That way you can use a lower ring size.  That will help with the Lowe comb stock for a better cheek weld.  Very nice rifle!  

Avatar
Winchester, VA
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1075
Member Since:
November 5, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 21, 2024 - 5:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Hi safestuffer-

That is an attractive Model 70.  You are correct that it has a type III-1 action made in 1948.  It’s an early one.  The first oval tang (type III) receivers turn up around S/N 88,000, so it’s the first variation of oval tang (type III-1), characterized by the notch in the bolt release lever, solid bolt knob, and flat right side on the bolt sleeve.  

You probably know that “1906” was what Winchester used under the barrel to denote 30-06 chambering and the at “48” is the date of barrel manufacture.  

I think that is, as you say, a milled down Win 22G rear sight (based on the shape of the sheet metal slide).  Winchester did offer a “flat top” version of the 22G sight in the catalog from 1941-47 as an option that would be supplied on order, but I think it used a different slide.  One was supposed to add an “F” to the end of the catalog symbol when ordering, i.e. G7004C for the 30 GOV’T’06 standard rifle with regular 22G and G7004CF for the flat top sight.  Maybe I’m wrong and the rifle was ordered from the factory with that sight (???)…

Best,

Lou

WACA 9519; Studying Pre-64 Model 70 Winchesters

WACA-Signauture-3.jpg

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5577
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
August 21, 2024 - 10:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’m no M70 collector so I’d update the rings, glass and recoil pad and take it hunting! The bases will work fine with Burris Z-rings, those Weaver rings have driven me to drink on occasion. I suspect some scopes may interfere with the rear sight so it would get stashed away in a carefully marked bag and a sight blank in its place. I like a 40mm or thereabouts objective for low-light hunting so may need medium rings. You have my ideal hunting rifle with the clean, classic M70 look. Enjoy!

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 7118
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
August 22, 2024 - 12:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said
I’m no M70 collector so I’d update the rings, glass and recoil pad and take it hunting! The bases will work fine with Burris Z-rings, those Weaver rings have driven me to drink on occasion. I suspect some scopes may interfere with the rear sight so it would get stashed away in a carefully marked bag and a sight blank in its place. I like a 40mm or thereabouts objective for low-light hunting so may need medium rings.

Superior optically, but personally I dislike “new scopes” on old rifles; I’m willing to give up some degree of optical performance to spare myself the extreme unpleasantness of having to look at an aluminum scope tube on my vintage rifle; and I practice what I preach.

The eyepiece lens appears to have separated; if so, it could be reglued, but there are so many good steel-tube K-model scopes on ebay, I doubt it would be worth the trouble; a shame, as scope appears to be in mint cond otherwise.  I just mounted a K-4 on a 52 using Weaver rings (came with scope) on an EGW rail; it did not drive me to drink–I got there all by myself.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: Jeremy Scott., mrcvs, deerhunter, Big Larry, Zebulon
Guest(s) 95
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7118
TXGunNut: 5577
Chuck: 4999
steve004: 4666
1873man: 4464
Big Larry: 2447
twobit: 2349
mrcvs: 1946
TR: 1784
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 13468
Posts: 118890

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1895
Members: 9271
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation