Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester high wall 1885
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Eastern Ct.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 32
Member Since:
February 28, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
October 14, 2019 - 11:52 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

recently saw a winchester 1885 mfg.  in 1887 in 32 scf cal.?  looked in the cartridges of the world, but saw no reference to it. does anyone know anything about this cartridge? straight, tapered, bottle neck, length?  thanks in advance   Bill

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4970
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
2
October 14, 2019 - 12:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

32 Short Center Fire?

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
October 14, 2019 - 12:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bill Sticht said
recently saw a winchester 1885 mfg.  in 1887 in 32 scf cal.? 

I think someone has misread the marking, or it has been messed with–“.32 WCF” is the only marking that makes sense; in other words, .32-20.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
October 14, 2019 - 1:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

TXGunNut said
32 Short Center Fire?

 

Mike  

There WAS a .32 Short Center Fire, but it was called .32 Short Colt, & was merely the CF version of the old (1860) S&W .32 RF.  But because Colt introduced the CF version, their name, rather than S&W, was the one that stuck.  Ditto for the .32 Long CF.

Winchester did chamber the SS model in both the .32 RF & CF versions (but presumably in the LW action), but I don’t know how they were marked–probably only .32 Long or Short, as Winchester hated to admit making use of a cartridge originally designed by any competitor.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4571
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
October 14, 2019 - 9:27 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

According to Ray Giles book the 1885 used Winchester cartridges in 32 SCF, LCF, XLCF, 32 Ideal, 32 WCF and the 32-40.  It was loaded with the 32 short, long and 32 Xl or extra long rimfires.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
October 14, 2019 - 10:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bill Hanzel said
https://auctions.thegunrunner.com/lots/view/1-2B7DEB/winchester-model-1885-high-wall-32-scf-cal-single-shot-rifle-26-octagon-1-barrel-1887-antique  

A HW in .32 Short, CF or RF, falls into the “now I’ve seen everything” category.  A 32 RF might make slightly more sense, as it was cheap to shoot.  Wouldn’t be at all surprised if someone buys this with the intention of re-boring or re-barreling it, as the action alone is worth the current bid price.

Avatar
Eastern Ct.
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 32
Member Since:
February 28, 2019
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
October 15, 2019 - 1:12 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks for the information, evidently it was under powered  and short lived. Appears now that the original cartridge/case has become very collectable, if you find them.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
October 15, 2019 - 1:47 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bill Sticht said
Thanks for the information, evidently it was under powered  and short lived. Appears now that the original cartridge/case has become very collectable, if you find them.  

Underpowered, for sure, but popular for a long time–particularly in Marlins & Marlin Ballards with the reversible firing pin that allowed both cheap RF & CF to be fired in the same gun. Original cases are hard to find, but an ebay dealer sells both (reformed) cases and the heel bullets required for this cartridge.  

I reamed the chamber of a Ballard in this caliber to accept the very slightly larger cases of the .32 S&W Long, which is a more powerful & much more accurate cartridge still used in some bulls-eye competition, & if I wanted another “project” (I don’t!), I’d buy this HW & do the same.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10726
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
October 15, 2019 - 2:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

The rifle in question is one of just three that were factory chamberd for the 32 Short Colt (center fire).  It is rare!!  All three of the rifles were early production high-walls (low-walls were not in vogue yet).  I hope nobody is stupid enough to rebore or ream the chamber!

The following is the list of .32 caliber cartridges factory chambered in the Model 1885;

Cartridge Qty
32 W.C.F. 12,640
32-40 11,175
32 Short (Rim Fire) 3,903
32 Long (Rim Fire) 3,263
32 IDEAL 267
32 Long (Colt) 40
32 EX Long (Rim Fire) 28
32 W.S. 26
32 Short (Colt) 3
32 EX Long (Ballard) 2

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
11
January 7, 2021 - 11:41 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
The rifle in question is one of just three that were factory chambered for the 32 Short Colt (center fire).  It is rare!!  All three of the rifles were early production high-walls (low-walls were not in vogue yet).  I hope nobody is stupid enough to rebore or ream the chamber!

The following is the list of .32 caliber cartridges factory chambered in the Model 1885;

Cartridge Qty
32 W.C.F. 12,640
32-40 11,175
32 Short (Rim Fire) 3,903
32 Long (Rim Fire) 3,263
32 IDEAL 267
32 Long (Colt) 40
32 EX Long (Rim Fire) 28
32 W.S. 26
32 Short (Colt) 3
32 EX Long (Ballard) 2

Bert  

Hammer price was $1450. Good deal considering its rarity?

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
January 7, 2021 - 3:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

RickC said

Hammer price was $1450. Good deal considering its rarity?  

Yes, considering tang sight was worth $200, & action alone, $1000; gun could be parted out for more than $1450.  Bidders, apparently, weren’t interested in its rarity, or it would have brought more; in fact, it’s “rarity” is what depressed the price.  I think same gun in, say, .32 WCF, would have brought $500 more.

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
13
January 7, 2021 - 3:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

clarence said

Yes, considering tang sight was worth $200, & action alone, $1000; gun could be parted out for more than $1450.  Bidders, apparently, weren’t interested in its rarity, or it would have brought more; in fact, it’s “rarity” is what depressed the price.  I think same gun in, say, .32 WCF, would have brought $500 more.  

Clarence I would’ve bought it for that price all day long but I have a soft spot for rare guns versus condition. Not the best collecting strategy but each to his own.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
January 7, 2021 - 5:30 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

RickC said

Clarence I would’ve bought it for that price all day long but I have a soft spot for rare guns versus condition. Not the best collecting strategy but each to his own.  

Well, I have a soft spot for shootable guns versus condition!  Cond. of this one doesn’t offend me in the least, & I would prefer it to one having a splotchy, scratched-up, 75% blue. 

Though it seems like too incredible a coincidence, I’m beginning to think I once saw this same gun in a Vermont gunshop 30+ yrs ago.  What I distinctly remember about that one was it had no finish, had a #1 brl on a HW action (itself odd), & was some kind of .32, but not .32 WCF, or I’d probably have bought it.  I might have thought it was one of the common .32 RFs, though it would have made no difference had I known it was .32 Colt.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10726
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
January 7, 2021 - 5:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

High-walls with a No. 1 barrel are actually quite common.  There were several thousand of them made in the first 15,000 or so Single Shot rifles that were manufactured.  Nearly all of the early production Single Shot rifles made in 32, 38, and 44 WCF small shank No. 1 barrels.

Bert

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
RickC
Guest
WACA Guest
16
January 7, 2021 - 9:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

My 85 is a low wall 32 RF. Was lucky to find a couple hundred rounds of the newer Navy Arms ammo. I won’t shoot a box of 50 thru it in my lifetime but nice to have some spares for my son & grand kids some day.

93A7E627-7E98-4883-95BF-6548A76751E1.jpegImage Enlarger

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
January 7, 2021 - 10:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

RickC said
My 85 is a low wall 32 RF. Was lucky to find a couple hundred rounds of the newer Navy Arms ammo. I won’t shoot a box of 50 thru it in my lifetime but nice to have some spares for my son & grand kids some day.
  

Well, maybe the “newer” stuff will do better than 6″ at 50 yds, because that was as good as some I bought 20 yrs ago shot.  That was out of a Stevens Favorite with a like new bore.  The Canuck brand I also had at that time managed about half that, but at over twice the price.  I’ve been told that old US made ammo is much more accurate, if you don’t mind spending a buck or two per round.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4160
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 6281
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
January 8, 2021 - 1:01 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

Given the rarity, I’d say this one sold way low.  

Disagree.  Rarity brings a premium only when potential buyers are looking for it–there exists a significant demand, in other words.  Rarity per se has no cash value–demand is what creates value.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 10726
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
January 8, 2021 - 1:22 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

steve004 said

Given the rarity, I’d say this one sold way low.  

I agree with Clarence… rarity in of itself does not equate to elevated values, especially with the Winchester Single Shot rifle.  First and foremost is the caliber/cartridge, with the bigger calibers bringing a lot more $$$$ than the small bore rifles in identical configuration and condition.  The other factor is the specific variation… the Fancier grade rifles always bring more $$$$, and within the Single Shot rifles selections, there were three different variations of Fancy grade. 

The graded condition of that rifle just simply did not justify the bid being any higher than it ended at.

Bert 

WACA 6571L, Historian & Board of Director Member
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: TXGunNut
Guest(s) 174
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6281
TXGunNut: 4970
Chuck: 4571
1873man: 4282
steve004: 4160
Big Larry: 2324
twobit: 2291
TR: 1710
mrcvs: 1706
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12650
Posts: 109996

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1745
Members: 8791
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation