Log In
Members
Home
Add Reply
Add Topic
Offline
A friend of mine texted me pictures of a ’94 SRC that he is interested in buying. Unfortunately, the pics did not include the serial number, but he did say the bore was good and that it had a shotgun butt. I’m hardly the expert you folks are…… 🙂 to me the metal finish looks original, but the butt stock finish concerns me. I looks a bit rough around the upper tang, and appears to have been sanded and refinished. Also, I see several buggered screw heads. Obviously the rear sight is missing, but the tang sight appears “period correct” – but that is a guess because I don’t know the year it was made.
The gun store wants $1,699 for it, which seems a bit high for the condition.
What do you folks think about condition and price?
The metal appears to have been refinished. Note the flatten guide screw in the photo of the left side. Hard to put a value based on those photos but 1699 seems too high
John,
The receiver frame has positively been buffed, polished, & reblued.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
sb said
The metal appears to have been refinished. Note the flatten guide screw in the photo of the left side. Hard to put a value based on those photos but 1699 seems too high
I see the flat screw now – thanks for pointing that out.
Bert – if you don’t mind my asking – what are the “tells” you’re seeing?
John D. said
sb said
The metal appears to have been refinished. Note the flatten guide screw in the photo of the left side. Hard to put a value based on those photos but 1699 seems too high
I see the flat screw now – thanks for pointing that out.
Bert – if you don’t mind my asking – what are the “tells” you’re seeing?
The exact same thing that SB observed.
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Online
This picture may help you see what the others are explaining. This is my 25-35 SRC made in 1911. Take note of the wood to metal fit also.
It cost a fair bit more than your $1,699 USD, but you pay for high condition original Winchesters. 
A man can never have too many WINCHESTERS...
Aussie Chris said
This picture may help you see what the others are explaining. This is my 25-35 SRC made in 1911. Take note of the wood to metal fit also.It cost a fair bit more than your $1,699 USD, but you pay for high condition original Winchesters.
Thank you for the pic, and between you and the others that was a key detail that I missed so I’m glad I posted. Also – I noticed in his picture the sling ring mount/stud is at an odd angle, and most all I have seen are registered to the receiver parallel to the receiver top (as yours is). Is that something to note?
As it happens, I have a nice, later carbine that was made in 1940. I pulled it out and compared mine to his photos, and see exactly what you see. I bought it a year or two ago, for considerably less than $1,699. Here’s mine:
John D. said
Aussie Chris said
This picture may help you see what the others are explaining. This is my 25-35 SRC made in 1911. Take note of the wood to metal fit also.
It cost a fair bit more than your $1,699 USD, but you pay for high condition original Winchesters.
Thank you for the pic, and between you and the others that was a key detail that I missed so I’m glad I posted. Also – I noticed in his picture the sling ring mount/stud is at an odd angle, and most all I have seen are registered to the receiver parallel to the receiver top (as yours is). Is that something to note?
As it happens, I have a nice, later carbine that was made in 1940. I pulled it out and compared mine to his photos, and see exactly what you see. I bought it a year or two ago, for considerably less than $1,699. Here’s mine:
John,
Yes, the orientation of the SR stud is indeed something to note. As you noticed, the ring should pivot perfectly straight forward or back.
What is the s/n and caliber on you 1940 Carbine?
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
Bert H. said
John D. said
Aussie Chris said
This picture may help you see what the others are explaining. This is my 25-35 SRC made in 1911. Take note of the wood to metal fit also.
It cost a fair bit more than your $1,699 USD, but you pay for high condition original Winchesters.
Thank you for the pic, and between you and the others that was a key detail that I missed so I’m glad I posted. Also – I noticed in his picture the sling ring mount/stud is at an odd angle, and most all I have seen are registered to the receiver parallel to the receiver top (as yours is). Is that something to note?
As it happens, I have a nice, later carbine that was made in 1940. I pulled it out and compared mine to his photos, and see exactly what you see. I bought it a year or two ago, for considerably less than $1,699. Here’s mine:
John,
Yes, the orientation of the SR stud is indeed something to note. As you noticed, the ring should pivot perfectly straight forward or back.
What is the s/n and caliber on you 1940 Carbine?
Bert
Bert,
Serial number is 1231642. You blessed the purchase 4 years ago when I bought it. 🙂
https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/opinions-sought-1894-carbine-caliber-25-35/
1 Guest(s)
