May 14, 2025
OfflineHenry Mero said
Well, that does it , I’m taking these over priced new glasses back and keep using My old ones, sometimes ignorance is bliss.
My friend I would have sworn it was a 21 as well. Other than Bert knowing it was impossible for it to be a 21, I would bet even he might have thought that 4 was a 1?
April 15, 2005
OfflineBuck1967 said
Henry Mero said
Well, that does it , I’m taking these over priced new glasses back and keep using My old ones, sometimes ignorance is bliss.
My friend I would have sworn it was a 21 as well. Other than Bert knowing it was impossible for it to be a 21, I would bet even he might have thought that 4 was a 1?
Actually, I initially though it was a lightly struck “7”, but that too would have been a stretch with the serial number solidly in the 1924 range.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L

1 Guest(s)
Log In

