Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1894 that doesn't "letter"
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2514
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
1
January 16, 2025 - 7:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I picked this 1894 up from Cabelas about 10 years ago.  Shortly after purchase, I ordered a letter from Cody and was surprised to see it originated as 25-35 caliber and different sights. There are 2 R&R’s listed on the letter–assuming the barrel and sights swap occurred at this time??  Anyway, to all the Winchester purist collectors, what would this rifle be worth if in the original configuration vs. it’s present configuration?  Bore condition is excellent / like new.  Rifle is in beautiful high (90%+) condition and has “antique” status.  All opinions welcome.

Thanks,

Don

P1090645.JPGImage EnlargerP1090646.JPGImage EnlargerP1090647.JPGImage EnlargerP1090649.JPGImage EnlargerP1090650.JPGImage EnlargerP1090651.JPGImage EnlargerP1090652.JPGImage EnlargerP1090654.JPGImage EnlargerP1090655.JPGImage EnlargerP1090656.JPGImage EnlargerP1090657.JPGImage EnlargerP1090658.JPGImage EnlargerP1090659.JPGImage EnlargerP1090660.JPGImage EnlargerP1090661.JPGImage EnlargerP1090662.JPGImage EnlargerP1090663.JPGImage EnlargerP1090664.JPGImage EnlargerP1090666.JPGImage EnlargerP1090667.JPGImage EnlargerP1090665.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
January 16, 2025 - 7:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

What exactly is marked on the underneath side of the barrel that is currently on this rifle? 

The thing that would really bother me about this rifle is that it letters with very special sights (for a Model 1894) but they are no longer on the rifle. 

If the barrel is marked with either one of the R&R work order numbers listed on the letter, then I would be perfectly content with it not matching the original caliber.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2514
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
3
January 16, 2025 - 8:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Don,

What exactly is marked on the underneath side of the barrel that is currently on this rifle? 

The thing that would really bother me about this rifle is that it letters with very special sights (for a Model 1894) but they are no longer on the rifle. 

If the barrel is marked with either one of the R&R work order numbers listed on the letter, then I would be perfectly content with it not matching the original caliber.

Bert

  

Hi Bert,

I remember removing the forearm years ago, but neglected to take a photo for some reason.  Anyway, was hoping to find “J.P.P.” and a work order number, but unfortunately nothing of that sort.

Don

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 16, 2025 - 8:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

It might be worthwhile to check it again.  With an octagon barrel. the markings were not always stamped on the bottom (6 o’clock) barrel flat.  I have often found them on the 7:30 flat.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2514
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
January 16, 2025 - 9:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Don,

It might be worthwhile to check it again.  With an octagon barrel. the markings were not always stamped on the bottom (6 o’clock) barrel flat.  I have often found them on the 7:30 flat.

Bert

  

Hi Bert,

I carefully removed the forearm and unfortunately found nothing other than the usual markings and stamps–see photos.

Don

P1090668.JPGImage EnlargerP1090669.JPGImage EnlargerP1090670.JPGImage EnlargerP1090672.JPGImage EnlargerP1090673.JPGImage EnlargerP1090674.JPGImage EnlargerP1090675.JPGImage EnlargerP1090676.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 16, 2025 - 9:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

The barrel is suspicious due to the lack of a caliber marking on the underside.  I am leaning strongly towards it being a modern (non-factory) replacement piece, almost certainly not a factory replacement in the year 1898 or 1899.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2514
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
7
January 16, 2025 - 9:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said
Don,

The barrel is suspicious due to the lack of a caliber marking on the underside.  I am leaning strongly towards it being a modern (non-factory) replacement piece, almost certainly not a factory replacement in the year 1898 or 1899.

Bert

  

Bert,

What about the other stampings (VP for violent proof, NS, U, star, etc.) on the underside?  Aren’t these normally found on the underside of factory barrels?  The barrel looks to match the rest of the rifle perfectly with no added “W/P” proof marks, etc. consistent with an R&R in 1898 / 1899.  I would expect to see the W/P proof marks added at least to the barrel if the R&R’s occurred 1905 or later.  Also, when holding the barrel under bright LED light, it has that plummy reddish hue you always like to see on vintage original barrels.  All exterior markings, address, and caliber stamps are correctly located for that timeframe as well.  I agree it is a bit odd that the caliber stamp is absent from the underside, but it is present on the top flat forward of the receiver as it should be.  Another mystery I suppose.

Don

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
January 16, 2025 - 10:15 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Don,

I have not ever (yet) encountered an early production Model 1894 with a barrel marked “94” on the underside.  The other stamped markings you mention could easily be replicated. 

The fact that it does not have a caliber marking on the underside of the barrel and no markings to indicate it was an R&R replacement barrel, there are simply too many red flags for me to ever be comfortable describing it as an authentic Winchester Model 1894 rifle.  If is forever destined to be an “excuse” rifle.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2514
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
9
January 16, 2025 - 11:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bert, I appreciate your opinion/evaluation.  Out of curiosity, I pulled the forearm off of my model 1894 half magazine takedown chambered in 38-55 serial number 24498 and found the same “94” marking, along with the “VP” in an oval, a “W”, a star, and with the 38-55 caliber stamp.  Comparing this with the subject rifle at the beginning of this thread, it seems the only anomaly is the missing caliber stamp.  Does this change your opinion at all?  See below photos.

Don

P1090677.JPGImage EnlargerP1090678.JPGImage EnlargerP1090679.JPGImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12199
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
January 17, 2025 - 1:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

deerhunter said
Does this change your opinion at all?  See below photos.

Don  

No, it doesn’t change my opinion of the rifle by nearly enough.  It will forever have questions that cannot be answered or explained away.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 269
Member Since:
November 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
January 17, 2025 - 12:08 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

I believe the barrel is factory made at Winchester. But was Not on the gun when first produced. It was added later on. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 480
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
January 17, 2025 - 12:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’m trying to imagine a large operation like Winchester, in they’re huge complex, making and producing barrels. With racks and racks of barrels being produced, it seems pretty logical to me to stamp the caliber on the barrel when it was made. How else would you know what caliber it was without re checking every time with the proper gauges , which could become time consuming, and a waste of time, in itself. I’m just not sure on this one.

 

Anthony

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4874
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
January 17, 2025 - 1:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

The two R&R’s intrigue me.  I think most sellers wouldn’t give a second thought to advertising the rifle as having the barrel switched by Winchester.  And, a large percentage of buyers would readily accept that.  Our group here is meticulously cautious with how we evaluate rifles.  

Let me add to say, in my experience, the pinnacle of accessible Winchester knowledge is on this forum Cool

Avatar
Troutdale, OR
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2514
Member Since:
June 26, 2013
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
14
January 17, 2025 - 1:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Anthony said
I’m trying to imagine a large operation like Winchester, in they’re huge complex, making and producing barrels. With racks and racks of barrels being produced, it seems pretty logical to me to stamp the caliber on the barrel when it was made. How else would you know what caliber it was without re checking every time with the proper gauges , which could become time consuming, and a waste of time, in itself. I’m just not sure on this one.

 

Anthony

  

Hi Anthony,

In this case, the barrel is stamped 30 W.C.F. on the top flat just forward of the receiver.  It’s just missing the duplicated caliber stamp on the underside of the barrel.  Everything else, in my opinion, screams period Winchester factory-produced and swapped during one of the R&R’s.  Regardless, it’s a beautiful rifle with some nice features and also an antique.  It’s not going anywhere anytime soon.

Don

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4874
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
January 17, 2025 - 1:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

deerhunter said

Anthony said

I’m trying to imagine a large operation like Winchester, in they’re huge complex, making and producing barrels. With racks and racks of barrels being produced, it seems pretty logical to me to stamp the caliber on the barrel when it was made. How else would you know what caliber it was without re checking every time with the proper gauges , which could become time consuming, and a waste of time, in itself. I’m just not sure on this one.

 

Anthony

  

Hi Anthony,

In this case, the barrel is stamped 30 W.C.F. on the top flat just forward of the receiver.  It’s just missing the duplicated caliber stamp on the underside of the barrel.  Everything else, in my opinion, screams period Winchester factory-produced and swapped during one of the R&R’s.  Regardless, it’s a beautiful rifle with some nice features and also an antique.  It’s not going anywhere anytime soon.

Don

  

I agree that it is a beautiful rifle with much going for it.  Antique status, takedown, pistol grip checkered, very pleasing condition…Smile

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5929
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
January 17, 2025 - 2:16 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Beautiful rifle, indeed! It’s a shame that in a climate of fake guns an honest gun will sometimes have the shadow of “excuse gun”. A gun that doesn’t agree with the ledger will always invite extra scrutiny and unfortunately the red flags are there. I think, given the circumstances, that it is an honest gun but there isn’t much to support the factory barrel swap theory and a cautious, discriminating collector will likely shy away. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1470
Member Since:
July 8, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
January 17, 2025 - 2:19 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don,

That is one beautiful model 1894 and I would be proud to own it. In the first and second picture of the barrel underside markings, I see SN with 27 below that.  Does this have anything to do with the serial number of the receiver beings the serial number starts with 27?

Al

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 2055
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
January 17, 2025 - 2:35 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Here’s my entry in the same category.  A Winchester 1885 rifle in .32-40 with half octagon barrel that letters with full octagon.  And it also lacks the proper markings under the barrel.  Bought 32 years ago when it was the best I could afford.  As I have become more aware of condition, it’s one I would have sold by now had it lettered properly.  But what it would bring because of this despite the R & R, I enjoy it far more than the dollar figure it would likely bring at auction.

IMG_1978.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1976.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1977.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1980.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1968.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1969.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1970.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1983.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1988.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1989.jpegImage EnlargerIMG_1991.jpegImage Enlarger

sp_PlupAttachments Attachments
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 480
Member Since:
December 9, 2002
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
January 17, 2025 - 2:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

deerhunter said

Anthony said

I’m trying to imagine a large operation like Winchester, in they’re huge complex, making and producing barrels. With racks and racks of barrels being produced, it seems pretty logical to me to stamp the caliber on the barrel when it was made. How else would you know what caliber it was without re checking every time with the proper gauges , which could become time consuming, and a waste of time, in itself. I’m just not sure on this one.

 

Anthony

  

Hi Anthony,

In this case, the barrel is stamped 30 W.C.F. on the top flat just forward of the receiver.  It’s just missing the duplicated caliber stamp on the underside of the barrel.  Everything else, in my opinion, screams period Winchester factory-produced and swapped during one of the R&R’s.  Regardless, it’s a beautiful rifle with some nice features and also an antique.  It’s not going anywhere anytime soon.

Don

  

Don, I agree as I probably should have included the top caliber designation in my post. Yes it is a beautiful rifle and I wouldn’t discount the possibility of a forgotten stamping on the underside of the barrel. Quality control and or human error is a possibility as we’ve seen in the past. 

Thanks for sharing, as many of us would be proud to own it, I’m sure! Smile

Anthony

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1292
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
January 17, 2025 - 2:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Don ; I like Your gun , even with the excuses. I don’t take the information on “factory letters” as gospel, I have a few guns that don’t match the letter to a tee. This hasn’t worried Me to much knowing the gun is correct and the letter is in error, and I’m not saying that is the case with Your gun, and I would want to have it “in My hands” before I would offer an opinion, but some times the “letter” errors are just plain obvious. There are several mis calibre stamps documented. Yes it’s always nice when everything matches up to the “factory letter”, but sometimes a person has to use Their own “hands on” experience to make a judgement call. Here’s a couple examples: ser#335378, no mention of Pistol grip or s.g.b. or rubber b.p.. Ser# 137206 again no mention of the pistol grip, but it does mention the rubber plate. I have some other models with similar omissions  or conflicting information, one 1876 deluxe in particular with several dicrepancies, gun to letter, that I’m still trying to cypher the ledger entry. I have a few similar but not in that exact configuration, 1/2 o.b., r.b., s.g.b. , etc. with a plain stock and 1/2 mag. I typically pay in the $5,000.00 – $6,000.00  Cdn. unfortunatly that would translate in the $3500.00 to $4500.00  U.S. It would cost a few bucks to replace the lettered sights on You gun though, which I would endevor to do, if it were Mine. Let Me know if and when You’re going to part with it.    20250117_092433.jpgImage Enlarger20250117_092444.jpgImage Enlarger20250117_092524.jpgImage Enlarger20250117_092532.jpgImage Enlarger   My humble opinion only.

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Online: gobblerforge, deerhunter, M64lvr
Guest(s) 152
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5929
Chuck: 5348
steve004: 4874
1873man: 4568
Big Larry: 2475
twobit: 2417
mrcvs: 2055
TR: 1838
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14060
Posts: 124367

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1977
Members: 9595
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation