Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1894 - pre-war vs pre-64 quality / differences?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 37
Member Since:
January 7, 2022
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 20, 2022 - 11:24 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Hi forum, 

I’m aware of the significant manufacturing changes Winchester implemented in 1964, and I’ve also read accounts of the quality of pre-war models (pre-1939).

What are some differences in quality or style between a pre-war (made before 1939) Winchester 1894, vs a “transition period” Winchester 1894 (made in 1945-1964)? 

I understand that differences may not be applicable to all models. For example, Wayne Miller said that 1945-1964 Model 70’s retain the quality of pre-war models (link). This may not be too much a surprise since there are only 3 years of pre-war Model 70’s.

BUT collectors seem to designate pre-war Winchester 1894’s with their own status, it appears more exclusive than pre-64. 

Are there substantive quality differences for Model 1894’s in these eras? (before 1939, vs 1945-1964)?

Thank you. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1124
Member Since:
December 21, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 21, 2022 - 12:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yes there are a few subtle differences, pre war/ post war pre ’64, eg; long wood/short wood, but I think the quality of the 1950’s guns are every bit as good as the the 1930’s guns, 1894’s anyways

W.A.C.A. life member, Marlin Collectors Assn. charter and life member, C,S.S.A. member and general gun nut.

Avatar
NY
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 6624
Member Since:
November 1, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 21, 2022 - 2:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Ron P said
 For example, Wayne Miller said that 1945-1964 Model 70’s retain the quality of pre-war models (link). This may not be too much a surprise since there are only 3 years of pre-war Model 70’s.
 

Ron,  I read the piece but don’t see that he said that at all, & it would be absurd if he did.  Production began in 1936, & by the end of ’41, almost 42,000 had been mfgd.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 11071
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 21, 2022 - 8:50 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Ron,

The “Pre War” production for the Model 94 ended in late August, 1942 versus 1939, and the “Post War” production began in September 1945. There were a number of production changes that Winchester made, and the fit & finish was noticeably of lesser quality after the war.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 264
Member Since:
November 17, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 21, 2022 - 12:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Prewar 94’s look like they are custom made by a master gunsmith compared to the excellent assembly line quality of post war guns. But you have to be very attuned to nuances of fit and finish and parts to see the difference. Beginners won’t see it. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 347
Member Since:
February 18, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 25, 2022 - 10:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Effort to breath life into a Page 2 Thread concerning Model 94 quality! 🙂  I’m not that Model 94 experienced in general or by any means ‘on par’ with the experts here concerning the Model.  But still to concur with the precept of afterwar production resumption of a differing quality.  The war production itself as much about do more with less and my belief with definite ‘lessons learned’.  Although speaking of bolt action arms…  The Germans most notably in the diminished quality of their indigenous Model 98 rifles across the European defined WWII years from 1939 to 1945!  The so-called “flat band” also a clue portending wartime necessary as later civilian production also requiring ‘commercially acceptable’ rifles. Witness the Postwar (& overdue) moving from bolt Model 720 largely milled to Models 721 & 722 based extensively upon stampings 1948+ vintage high-power bolt rifles.  The fact of Winchester “lever action” models as ‘almost’ strictly civilian, didn’t exempt them from bolt & semi-auto lessons learned in production and materials composition, design, fitment and finish, amended techniques.  The Models 94 by the fifties weren’t the same quality to me as definitely the prewar ’42 designed & earlier rifles.  But frankly my self-designated ‘sweet spot’ Model 94 as I’ve harped before as with the new integral ramp and residual “carbine” wrap-over toe butt-plate.  The Model 55 Serrated buttplate a few clicks below my described carbine type. Returning to postwar, the Model 64 in my amateurish opinion retained prewar characteristics of quality somewhat longer as into the early fifties mostly undisturbed.  Validity of my experience questionable but my – as I recall – ’51 vintage Model 64 ‘seeming better than 94 rifles of same era.  

Moving to the Model 70 where I’m more comfortable speaking even as yet a non-expert.  My observation that the prewar components particular as exemplified clip loading bridge feature, remained much the same.  In perhaps with the 1946 entrée of the ‘new clip free receiver bridge some diminution of “Prewar” heralded quality in terms of finish and ‘perhaps’ of tolerances, to have been effected.  My observation as into the early fifties as obvious changes with the elimination of milled-integral front sight bases, as indicative of the ‘new & improved’ genre as to me esthetically simply not the same quality of fit or finish!  Finish is a component of a nice gun to my mind, but ‘primo’ in the grand scheme of a desirable rifle. 

Yet another principle too.  Those gun show overpriced Winchesters, Sunday afternoon yet ‘lying in state’…  All lookin’ prettier at closing time! 🙂 🙂 🙂 

Just my take!

John

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 202
Member Since:
January 28, 2016
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
February 25, 2022 - 10:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Besides externally, a comparison of the internals will clearly show that the pre-war guns are of a much higher quality than the post-war guns.  That whole fitted by a master gunsmith vs. assembly line thing.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: keith shaffer, TXGunNut, TR, JP_MA_3006
Guest(s) 95
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6623
TXGunNut: 5263
Chuck: 4729
steve004: 4391
1873man: 4357
Big Larry: 2380
twobit: 2326
mrcvs: 1801
TR: 1738
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 13019
Posts: 113798

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1819
Members: 8995
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation