Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1886 receiver sight help
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
December 29, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
December 26, 2024 - 7:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Picked up a Winchester 1886 pistol grip in 33wcf and it has two holes on the left side for a receiver sight. Holes are 0.400 c to c is this for a lyman or another? i just don’t want to order sight till i get it wright.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
December 26, 2024 - 8:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Roger,

Based on my observations, all of the various receiver mounted peep sights used the same hole spacing… e.g. Lyman, Redfield, Williams, etc.  Winchester primarily used Lyman sights.

What is the serial number on your Model 1886?  A very small number of the late production 33 WCF rifles were equipped with a Lyman No. 56 receiver sight.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
December 29, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
December 26, 2024 - 9:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

sn:145038 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
December 26, 2024 - 9:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
sn:145038 

Not quite late enough for a factory drilled & tapped receiver.  Have you contacted Cody for a research sheet or factory letter?

Is the rifle a Solid frame or a Take Down? Plain pistol grip or Fancy?  Pictures?

 

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 431
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
December 26, 2024 - 10:17 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

ROGER lane said

sn:145038 

Not quite late enough for a factory drilled & tapped receiver.  Have you contacted Cody for a research sheet or factory letter?

Is the rifle a Solid frame or a Take Down? Plain pistol grip or Fancy?  Pictures?

 

Bert

  

Are there 86s that letter with the Lyman 48?  Or are they too late to letter?

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 431
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
December 26, 2024 - 10:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
Picked up a Winchester 1886 pistol grip in 33wcf and it has two holes on the left side for a receiver sight. Holes are 0.400 c to c is this for a lyman or another? i just don’t want to order sight till i get it wright.

  

I found an early Redfield sight (102 I believe) that had a wider spacing than others like the Lyman 56, etc.  To use the existing holes with a later sight, I had an additional hole drilled in the sight. 

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
December 29, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
December 26, 2024 - 10:28 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

solid frame Cody say’s rifle round barrel 33 wcf pistol grip nothing about the sight. should it say if it had checkering? still having a problem with down loading pics. 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
December 26, 2024 - 10:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

sb said

Bert H. said

ROGER lane said

sn:145038 

Not quite late enough for a factory drilled & tapped receiver.  Have you contacted Cody for a research sheet or factory letter?

Is the rifle a Solid frame or a Take Down? Plain pistol grip or Fancy?  Pictures?

Bert 

Are there 86s that letter with the Lyman 48?  Or are they too late to letter?

I typo’d that… I meant to say “No. 56” (the same sight used on the Model 71).

They are all too late to letter. The few that I have found also have Proof Steel barrels versus the older Nickel Steel.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
December 26, 2024 - 10:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
solid frame Cody say’s rifle round barrel 33 wcf pistol grip nothing about the sight. should it say if it had checkering? still having a problem with down loading pics. 

  

You can send the pictures to my email – [email protected]

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
December 29, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
December 26, 2024 - 10:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Yes it has a proof steel barrel. it did letter it came with the rifle. So a lyman 56A would be the right sight?  What about the letter stating pistol grip would it say with checkering? it has the pistol grip cap with no checkering.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 431
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
December 26, 2024 - 10:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
Picked up a Winchester 1886 pistol grip in 33wcf and it has two holes on the left side for a receiver sight. Holes are 0.400 c to c is this for a lyman or another? i just don’t want to order sight till i get it wright.

  

.4 is pretty close to the Lyman 56 hole spacing

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
December 26, 2024 - 10:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
Yes it has a proof steel barrel. it did letter it came with the rifle. So a lyman 56A would be the right sight?  What about the letter stating pistol grip would it say with checkering? it has the pistol grip cap with no checkering.

  

Roger,

What is the “received in warehouse” date on the letter?

Yes, a Lyman No. 56A would be the most appropriate receiver sight.

If the rifle as a pistol grip without checkering, the factory letter would only state “Pistol grip”.  I would very much like to see a copy of the factory letter.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 431
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
December 26, 2024 - 10:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
Yes it has a proof steel barrel. it did letter it came with the rifle. So a lyman 56A would be the right sight?  What about the letter stating pistol grip would it say with checkering? it has the pistol grip cap with no checkering.

  

The Lyman 56 wasn’t being produced when that rifle was made.   If the rifle was checkered by Winchester,  the letter should say so.  But, there were many pistol grip Winchesters made without checkering

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
December 26, 2024 - 11:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

sb said

ROGER lane said

Yes it has a proof steel barrel. it did letter it came with the rifle. So a lyman 56A would be the right sight?  What about the letter stating pistol grip would it say with checkering? it has the pistol grip cap with no checkering.

The Lyman 56 wasn’t being produced when that rifle was made.   If the rifle was checkered by Winchester,  the letter should say so.  But, there were many pistol grip Winchesters made without checkering  

If the rifle letters with a Proof Steel barrel, it is entirely possible for it to also have been equipped with a Lyman No. 56A sight.  In this case, the receiver frame was most likely manufactured in the year 1909 or 1910, but then sat in the parts bin unassembled for approximately 25-years.  I really would like to see the factory letter!

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 431
Member Since:
November 8, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
December 26, 2024 - 11:13 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert H. said

sb said

ROGER lane said

Yes it has a proof steel barrel. it did letter it came with the rifle. So a lyman 56A would be the right sight?  What about the letter stating pistol grip would it say with checkering? it has the pistol grip cap with no checkering.

The Lyman 56 wasn’t being produced when that rifle was made.   If the rifle was checkered by Winchester,  the letter should say so.  But, there were many pistol grip Winchesters made without checkering  

If the rifle letters with a Proof Steel barrel, it is entirely possible for it to also have been equipped with a Lyman No. 56A sight.  In this case, the receiver frame was most likely manufactured in the year 1909 or 1910, but then sat in the parts bin unassembled for approximately 25-years.  I really would like to see the factory letter!

Bert

  

For that to be the case, the letter would show no information available?  If it shows a 1908, 1909, 1910 ship date, the sight would have been non factory,  right?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
16
December 26, 2024 - 11:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

sb said

Bert H. said

sb said

ROGER lane said

Yes it has a proof steel barrel. it did letter it came with the rifle. So a lyman 56A would be the right sight?  What about the letter stating pistol grip would it say with checkering? it has the pistol grip cap with no checkering.

The Lyman 56 wasn’t being produced when that rifle was made.   If the rifle was checkered by Winchester,  the letter should say so.  But, there were many pistol grip Winchesters made without checkering  

If the rifle letters with a Proof Steel barrel, it is entirely possible for it to also have been equipped with a Lyman No. 56A sight.  In this case, the receiver frame was most likely manufactured in the year 1909 or 1910, but then sat in the parts bin unassembled for approximately 25-years.  I really would like to see the factory letter!

Bert

For that to be the case, the letter would show no information available?  If it shows a 1908, 1909, 1910 ship date, the sight would have been non factory,  right?

If the letter lists the Proof Steel barrel (as Roger stated it does), it cannot be showing “no information available”.  If it shows a Sold date in the range you mention, it cannot have an original Proof Steel barrel, and Yes, a receiver sight would not be factory original.  The key to figuring all of this out is seeing the information listed on the factory letter.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
December 29, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
17
December 26, 2024 - 11:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert I over looked the stamp for a barrel it has the wp and circle p. received in warehouse on sept. 19th 1908  Bert i’ll send the letter to your e-mail 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
18
December 26, 2024 - 11:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
Bert I over looked the stamp for a barrel it has the wp and circle p. received in warehouse on sept. 19th 1908  Bert i’ll send the letter to your e-mail 

  

The circle “P” indicates that it is not the original barrel.  The received in warehouse date all but eliminates the possibility of the receiver frame being factory drilled & tapped for the receiver sight.

Does the rifle have a full length or a shorter magazine?  Black hard rubber butt plate or something else?

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
December 29, 2023
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
19
December 27, 2024 - 12:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert it’s a short mag did you get the email of the letter  on the 1886?

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12072
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
20
December 27, 2024 - 1:10 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

ROGER lane said
Bert it’s a short mag did you get the email of the letter on the 1886?

  

I did receive it, and I sent you a reply message.  The CFM research sheet clearly indicates that it was manufactured with a plain (non-checkered) pistol grip stock. The original barrel was Nickel Steel, and the receiver frame was not drilled & tapped for a sight.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 5862
Chuck: 5248
steve004: 4855
1873man: 4558
Big Larry: 2471
twobit: 2399
mrcvs: 2042
TR: 1832
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 13941
Posts: 123257

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1957
Members: 9543
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation