Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
Winchester 1873 .32 WCF third model
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1727
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
1
August 23, 2020 - 7:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

How undesirable is the aforementioned (.32 WCF) WITH a ROUND barrel these days?

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
August 23, 2020 - 10:36 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I wouldn’t call them undesirable, its that the majority of collectors want the octagon barrels to the point that a round barrel is about a 10% to 20%  less than a like condition octagon gun. You really learn this if you put one on a gunshow table and by the end of the show the most common remark will be “If that was  a octagon I would buy it”.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Northern edge of the D/FW Metromess
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 5057
Member Since:
November 7, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
August 24, 2020 - 4:26 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’m thinking condition is an important part of this issue. As condition increases I think the barrel type has more influence on the value. As a 70% shooter I’d be more concerned about the bore. As a 90% showpiece the octagon barrel will certainly help make the sale. Quite honestly I’d love to have a 70% shooter in 32WCF but at this time I’d be hard pressed to buy a higher grade 1873 in 32WCF. I love the cartridge but the larger bores seem to sell better. 

I don’t know 1873’s like Bob does but I know that if I put two similar 1873’s on my table at the beginning of a show and one was an OB I’d expect it to act as eye candy and quite likely sell before the RB. 

 

Mike

Life Member TSRA, Endowment Member NRA
BBHC Member, TGCA Member
Smokeless powder is a passing fad! -Steve Garbe
I hate rude behavior in a man. I won't tolerate it. -Woodrow F. Call, Lonesome Dove
Some of my favorite recipes start out with a handful of depleted counterbalance devices.-TXGunNut
Presbyopia be damned, I'm going to shoot this thing! -TXGunNut
Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1727
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
4
August 25, 2020 - 3:09 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Judging from these responses, the round barrel is far less desirable than an octagon one, but 10 to 20% less valuable, which seems hard to believe since if infinitely less desirable, a 10 to 20% decrease in valuation would seem negligible.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
5
August 26, 2020 - 3:44 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I think when people see a low-finish ’73 with an octagon barrel, they say, “at least it has an octagon barrel.”

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4600
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
August 26, 2020 - 4:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

What it really comes down to is whether or not you like round barrels.  If you are a collector buy what you like.  If you are a dealer buy it for the right price for resale, a little less than what an octagon would be.  Believe it or not some prefer the round barrel.

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1727
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
7
August 29, 2020 - 4:59 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

In answer to the aforementioned, this is what such a rifle is worth in today’s market at auction:  $1762.50

I was not the winning bidder.  I was contemplating bidding, however, and this rifle caused me to create this thread.

In the end, it lacked the 3 C’s:  Caliber, Condition, and Configuration.  Caliber is less desirable, but I wouldn’t mind having a .32-20 to shoot every now and again.  Condition certainly isn’t bad, but could be better.  Configuration is the big one, and I realized that before I created this thread–Round barrels are just far less desirable than Octagon ones.

https://live.amoskeagauction.com/m/lot-details/index/catalog/50/lot/26196?url=%2Fm%2Fview-auctions%2Fcatalog%2Fid%2F50%3Flotnum%3D217

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
8
August 29, 2020 - 5:29 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Not a bad looking piece.  I see the auction estimate was $2000 to $4000.  I am not surprised it didn’t meet that.  As you say, it didn’t have the three C’s.  For a fun .32-20 to shoot, in my book, nothing beats a Model 1892.  Particularly in a carbine Smile

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
August 29, 2020 - 9:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

In the  march Amoskeag auction it had a 3k to 5k estimate and it didn’t sell.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Sydney Australia
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 188
Member Since:
July 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
August 29, 2020 - 9:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Is a Round Barrel more or less common to find in 32/20

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4600
Member Since:
March 31, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
August 29, 2020 - 10:34 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

1873man said
In the  march Amoskeag auction it had a 3k to 5k estimate and it didn’t sell.

Bob  

I wonder if something is wrong with it?

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4261
Member Since:
November 19, 2006
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
12
August 29, 2020 - 10:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

From my point of view, even if there is nothing wrong with it, a $2000 to $4000 of a $3000 to $5000 estimate is quite unrealistic.  

Avatar
Montana
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 647
Member Since:
November 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
August 29, 2020 - 11:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I’ve  had several 73’s in .32-20 over the years, both round and octagon.  I too, prefer the octagon as I’m  not a fan of any lever gun with a round barrel.  I really like the cartridge though.  It’s  a lot of fun to shoot and easy to reload.  My favorite ’73 is the .44 WCF rifle with the barrel measuring 27/32nd ” across the muzzle flates.  You can definitely tell the difference when looking at and holding one with the 23/32″ and the 27/32″.  Bob will know, but I  think  most 1st models had the heavier weight barrel, at least all that I  have owned and still have are the 27/32″ size.  I had quite a collection of 76’s also, but none with round barrels.  Sorry, I just don’t  care for them.  I agree with steve004, the best .32-20 is a ’92 carbine.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
August 30, 2020 - 12:43 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Tony. R said
Is a Round Barrel more or less common to find in 32/20  

Round barrel is less common than octagon. They make up 20% of the 32’s

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4323
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
15
August 30, 2020 - 1:11 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

win4575 said
I’ve  had several 73’s in .32-20 over the years, both round and octagon.  I too, prefer the octagon as I’m  not a fan of any lever gun with a round barrel.  I really like the cartridge though.  It’s  a lot of fun to shoot and easy to reload.  My favorite ’73 is the .44 WCF rifle with the barrel measuring 27/32nd ” across the muzzle flates.  You can definitely tell the difference when looking at and holding one with the 23/32″ and the 27/32″.  Bob will know, but I  think  most 1st models had the heavier weight barrel, at least all that I  have owned and still have are the 27/32″ size.  I had quite a collection of 76’s also, but none with round barrels.  Sorry, I just don’t  care for them.  I agree with steve004, the best .32-20 is a ’92 carbine.  

Most first models didn’t have a heavier barrel but they had the illusion of heavier barrel by having the magazine tube undercut in to the barrel farther than later ones. There are some guns with heavier muzzles since they had less taper and a few that I found that did have bigger breach and muzzles.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Avatar
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 1727
Member Since:
September 22, 2011
sp_UserOnlineSmall Online
16
August 30, 2020 - 1:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Opening bid on that one today was $1300.  With commission and shipping, you are into it for over $1500.  That’s where I was at on it, if I could get it for the opening bid–maybe, for what it is.  Something to shoot with black powder.  I think it went for too high for what it is.  Nice, but a problem to move should I tire of it.

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 778
Currently Online: steve004, Farmboy, Maverick, mrcvs, clarence, Tedk, Big Larry, Green River Gus
Guest(s) 183
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 6387
TXGunNut: 5057
Chuck: 4600
1873man: 4323
steve004: 4261
Big Larry: 2350
twobit: 2305
mrcvs: 1727
TR: 1725
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 17
Topics: 12786
Posts: 111382

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 1769
Members: 8872
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation