Log In
December 31, 2012
Offline
Come on you collectors. I cannot believe that no one has an answer for me. Thanks, Big Larry
April 15, 2005
Online
Larry,
What is your post in reference too??? Your post makes no sense (at least to me) without any reference point.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
July 17, 2012
Online
I think he is refering to this post? https://winchestercollector.org/forum/winchester-rifles/winchester-m1894-32-special-circa-1903-1/
Regards,
WACA Life Member #6284 - Specializing in Pre-64 Winchester .22 Rimfire
April 15, 2005
Online
Jeff,
Thanks, I believe that you are correct.
Larry,
In the future, please do not start an entirely new topic when you have an open topic question that has not yet been answered… it leads to confusion, and creates clutter.
Bert
WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
December 31, 2012
Offline
Sorry. I am computer illiterate and hit the wrong button. My bad !!! Big Larry
April 20, 2011
Offline
i have an 1886 light weight with swivels. it letters with them. including the buttplate, the rear swivel is 4″ from the toe. i also have a 1894 carbine with swivels. the rear swivel is 4 1/16 including the buttplate.
December 31, 2012
Offline
Thanks. I am sure there is a little variance in these measurements. My factory letter does not mention the swivels, but they are the real deal. 1903 vintage M1894 round bbl. takedown in 32 Special. A good 98% in condition. Thanks, Big Larry
April 20, 2011
Offline
i have a couple of other 92’s and 94’s and one other 1886 with pistol grip stock that have original swivels and they are all around 4″ from the toe. arthur pirkles book on 1894’s states the 4″ measurement as well.
1 Guest(s)
