Avatar
Search
Forum Scope




Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
Lost password?
sp_Feed sp_PrintTopic sp_TopicIcon
SN difficult to make out - any tips?
sp_NewTopic Add Topic
Avatar
Los Angeles
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
January 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
November 7, 2015 - 7:53 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost

Hello there,

 

I’m a relatively new WACA (and BBCOW) member and can’t thank enough all of the knowledgable folks here sharing information. I have about a dozen Winchesters in my collection and have learned more reading this forum than I think I have since I started collecting 10 years ago.

Maybe someone here has some hints. I have a M1894 (30WCF, 26″ Full Octagon, Full Magazine, Buckhorn sight, Nickel Barrel, Crescent Butt) that’s still fully functional and crisp, but has definitely seen some use in its day. It’s aged to a nice brown patina and shows wear in high handling areas, especially the underside of the receiver where the SN is. As a result, I can’t quite make out the first digit (and maybe the second, although I think it is a zero – SN# X01374). Unfortunately the magazine plug screw at the muzzle is pretty buggered so I can’t get the magazine (and hence the forearm) off to see if there is a date stamp on the barrel.

Does anyone have any thoughts on how ti ID this rifle otherwise? Any other place I might look for a hint as to the serial number?

Thanks in advance,

 

Steve

Image Enlarger

WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.

Avatar
Arizona
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 64
Member Since:
April 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
November 7, 2015 - 9:06 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Try sending a couple of photos of the upper tang marking, barrel address, top of the hammer and the top of the receiver where it meets the barrel (proof mark or no proof mark) this will help narrow down the first number of the serial number.

Brian

Avatar
Los Angeles
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
January 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
November 7, 2015 - 10:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Brian.

Here are some more images:

 

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

Image Enlarger

WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 163
Member Since:
January 22, 1999
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
November 7, 2015 - 11:09 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Well,

It appears to me that the serial number is,

#91874

"I Would Have Rather Lived Through The Industrial Revaluation"

"Instead of The Space Age"

From

 The Twilight Zone

 

Avatar
Los Angeles
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
January 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
November 7, 2015 - 11:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

You may be correct on that. Honestly I’ve looked at this in every light at every angle and thought that was a “3” but when I went to post pics, I used a plugin to do some edge-enhancement to bring out the detail and now I think that may be an “8” as well. 

As far as the first visible digit, I assumed there should be one more leading digit as that would center the SN but maybe that’s not an assumption I should make. If there isn’t a hidden digit then you are right, that would have to be a “9” most likely. 

WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.

Avatar
Ontario Canada
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 584
Member Since:
April 23, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
November 7, 2015 - 11:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory sp_QuotePost
  • Since the proof marks on barrel and receiver and hammer pattern I think your 6 digit serial no. Starts with a  3 ( the missing digit)

2nd half visible digit probably a 0 ,not a 3 or 8 

if not a 0 it could only otherwise be a 9

Havng fun looking at pics with new phone (pretty clear when enlarging ) but I am awaiting new glasses

My guess 301374

Someone will be able to peg it shortly,  better than I

Phils-Schuetzen-compressed.jpg 

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12502
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
November 8, 2015 - 6:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Steve,

Based on the factory markings on the barrel (and their specific location), the upper tang marking (Type-2), and the fact that it is proof marked, the serial number was 401374.  Serial number 301374 would have had the caliber stamp on the top flat of the barrel, and serial number 501374 would have a Type-3 upper tang marking.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Los Angeles
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
January 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
November 8, 2015 - 7:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Thanks Bert,

If I could ask an amateur question, you refer to “Type-2” etc markings. Is there a definite reference for these? I have Madis and Williamson, but I don’t necessarily see clear definitions of different “Types” except in general description of lineage and then Madis will refer to both barrel and tang markings in describing the different generations.

I guess I am wondering if there is a table of roll marks somewhere that is the definitive reference?

WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 103
Member Since:
December 12, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
November 9, 2015 - 2:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Bert is probably referring to Robert Rennebergs book, “Winchester Model 1894, a century of craftsmanship” A excellent reference.

Avatar
Los Angeles
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 379
Member Since:
January 19, 2006
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
10
November 9, 2015 - 2:44 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Wow. Thanks. Just bought the Kindle book. You aren’t kidding. There’s a world of info in there. 

 

Thanks again.

 

Steve

WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.

Avatar
Kingston, WA
Admin
Forum Posts: 12502
Member Since:
April 15, 2005
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
11
November 9, 2015 - 4:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

I was referring to my own survey, but Yes, it is nearly identical to the information in Bob Renneberg’s books.

There were nine different upper tang markings used as follows;

Type 1, 1A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5A, 6, and 7. I have (through my research survey) very closely defined when each type was used (serial number range). Bob was unaware of the Type-5A until I pointed it out to him a few years ago.

Bert

WACA Historian & Board of Director Member #6571L
High-walls-1-002-C-reduced2.jpg

Avatar
Member
WACA Guest
Forum Posts: 47
Member Since:
September 7, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
12
November 9, 2015 - 4:07 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

Steve,  There is a trick used by collectors of fine old shotguns to read difficult to discern proofmarks..Smoke the serial number area with a candle until a nice layer of soot covers it. Then gently lay a piece of scotch tape across the serial number..press down across the tape, carefully peal off the tape and then put the tape on a sheet of bright white paper…some times the results are truly amazing. no guarantee’s but it is worth a try.

Avatar
Wisconsin
Member
WACA Member
Forum Posts: 4642
Member Since:
May 2, 2009
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
November 9, 2015 - 4:14 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_QuotePost

From what I see there is no way to lift the number with smoke. The only way is to use crime lab acid but that would require polishing the serial number which will ruin the patina finish.

Bob

WACA Life Member---
NRA Life Member----
Cody Firearms member since 1991
Researching the Winchester 1873's

73_86cutaway.jpg

Email: [email protected]

Forum Timezone: UTC 0
Most Users Ever Online: 4623
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Top Posters:
clarence: 7119
TXGunNut: 6113
Chuck: 5564
steve004: 4994
1873man: 4642
Big Larry: 2500
twobit: 2470
mrcvs: 2113
Maverick: 1903
Forum Stats:
Groups: 1
Forums: 18
Topics: 14352
Posts: 127561

 

Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 2012
Members: 9741
Moderators: 4
Admins: 3
Navigation