As I understand the UN-understadable, an unlicensed individual can not send any regulated rifle to an unlicensed person in another state.
You can however send it to yourself. I know this because I had to send a rifle from a competition to home due to travel restrictions and consulted a lawyer. Which doesn’t mean a thing now that I think about it. It was a free consult after all.
Vince
Southern Oregon
NRA member
Fraternal Order of Eagles
“There is but one answer to be made to the dynamite bomb and that can best be made by the Winchester rifle.”
Teddy Roosevelt
wallyb said
C&R’s can ship handguns to other C&R’s through USPS if they are on the BATF list. Your local gunshop will answer this question for you.
Walter
That is wrong. Only bona fide dealers or manufacturers can mail handguns USPS, and a form 1508 must submitted. Here is what the USPS handgun mailing form states “The undersigned is a manufacturer of firearms or bona fide dealer therein, and the parcels presented for mailing herewith are customary trade shipments or other articles for repair or replacement of parts. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the addresses are manufacturers of firearms or bona fide dealers therein.” C&R license holders specifically are NOT dealers in firearms.
wolfbait said
I do not have an FFL, can I ship a C&R eligible rifle to a C&R holder in another state. USPS regs are hard to interpret, they keep referencing other regulations.
I’m not a lawyer, only a licensed collector who always tries to obey the rules. Based upon what I’ve read/experienced, yes and no respectively. It must be shipped via an FFL dealer, etc. (NOT 03 C&R) in accordance with USPS rules. However, Federal law only specifies to a “licensee” (27 CFR 478.31 specifically mentions licensed collector) and be shipped via common carrier (i.e. FedEx, UPS). Don’t know what the current common carrier rules are…I always ship/receive FFL to FFL.
I’ve seen much Internet “banter” over various interpretations of rules/regulations, and know for a fact there are some (particularly 03 C&R holders) who don’t know/do what they’re supposed to, and rather than engage in useless contention & “flaming” from kitchen-table lawyers, I do what I know (and should know).
USPS Publication 52:
432.3 Rifles and Shotguns
(g) “Rifles and shotguns may be mailed by a non-FFL owner domestically to a FFL dealer, manufacturer, or importer in any state…”
http://pe.usps.com/text/pub52/pub52c4_009.htm#ep350890
[18 U.S.C. 1715, 922(a)(5) and 922 (a)(2)(A); 27 CFR 478.31]
https://www.atf.gov/firearms/qa/may-nonlicensee-ship-firearm-through-us-postal-service
According to the BATF:
A person may transfer a firearm to a licensee in any State. However, a firearm other than a curio or relic may not be transferred interstate to a licensed collector.
[18 U.S.C 922(a)(5) and 922(d); 27 CFR 478.30, 478.32]
So, you can ship a modern rifle to an FFL holder in another state or a qualifying C&R rifle to a C&R holder in another state. I’d say you are good to go.
Just don’t send it via USPS.
Also, some C&R holders will request a copy of your driver’s license or a comparable government-issued form of I.D. for their records. Regardless of how many times I’ve heard the: “It doesn’t say that in the Federal regs, so I’m not sending it;” when you live in a STATE that requires that information and you don’t have that information at your disposal, you are in violation of the conditions associated with holding a C&R license. Don’t even get me going…
USPS rules seem pretty simple to me where it concerns antique rifles and shotguns, which is my only interest.
Section 12 http://pe.usps.com/archive/html/dmmarchive20120122/601.htm#1201800
"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
OW1892 said
Just don’t send it via USPS.
Also, some C&R holders will request a copy of your driver’s license or a comparable government-issued form of I.D. for their records. Regardless of how many times I’ve heard the: “It doesn’t say that in the Federal regs, so I’m not sending it;” when you live in a STATE that requires that information and you don’t have that information at your disposal, you are in violation of the conditions associated with holding a C&R license. Don’t even get me going…
![]()
I live in California () and have been advised by the CA DOJ to record either the FFL# or Name and ID (DL for example) of the seller on anything I receive. While ID# is not expressly requested, we have to file form BOF 961 with the CA state DOJ and at least identify the seller by name or company.
If I didn’t work in the entertainment biz I’d be in a free state. But that’s another thread…
WACA Member. CFM Member. NRA Lifer.
Winchacher supplied the appropriate USPS regulation…Section 12 http://pe.usps.com/archive/html/dmmarchive20120122/601.htm#1201800
Open the link and scroll to Section 12.2.d…”Except as described in 12.1.2a, licensed curio and relic collectors may mail firearms meeting the definition of curios or relics under 27 CFR 478.11 domestically to FFL licensed curio and relic collectors in any state. USPS recommends these items be mailed using those services described in12.2a..”
12.1.2a referenced in 12.2.d merely restricts the mailing of handguns.
A couple of key points:
– Take a copy of these regs with you to the post office. Some postmasters are not familiar with them. I personally have been initially denied the opportunity to mail, but then politely showed them the regs, and they then allowed me to ship
– The last sentence about the USPS recommends mailing the items as described in 12.2a…keep in mind the reg used the word “recommends” as opposed to require. Than can be important b/c a confused postmaster may try to force you to send Express Mail with Return Service Requested. That is not necessary per 12.2.d
Greg
spursfan said
Winchacher supplied the appropriate USPS regulation…Section 12 http://pe.usps.com/archive/html/dmmarchive20120122/601.htm#1201800
Open the link and scroll to Section 12.2.d…”Except as described in 12.1.2a, licensed curio and relic collectors may mail firearms meeting the definition of curios or relics under 27 CFR 478.11 domestically to FFL licensed curio and relic collectors in any state. USPS recommends these items be mailed using those services described in12.2a..”
12.1.2a referenced in 12.2.d merely restricts the mailing of handguns.
Unless I’m totally inept at reading comprehension, 12.2 (d) pertains to licensed curio & relic collectors. He doesn’t have an FFL; he’s a “non-FFL owner.”
As stated in both USPS Publication 52, & Section 12.2 (c): Rifles and shotguns may be mailed by a non-FFL owner domestically to a FFL dealer, manufacturer, or importer in any state {My inference: NOT to an 03 C&R licensee}. USPS recommends these items be mailed using those services described in 12.2a..
If you want to ship USPS that’s on you…it’ll likely make it incident free. I wouldn’t, but that’s obviously just me.
I tried…and now rest my case.
The answer to the original question seems pretty clear cut:
c. Rifles and shotguns may be mailed by a non-FFL owner domestically to a FFL dealer, manufacturer, or importer in any state. USPS recommends these items be mailed using those services described in 12.2a..
d. Except as described in 12.1.2a, licensed curio and relic collectors may mail firearms meeting the definition of curios or relics under 27 CFR 478.11 domestically to FFL licensed curio and relic collectors in any state. USPS recommends these items be mailed using those services described in12.2a..
The original question does not state whether wolfbait has a C&R license but the question implies that he has no license of any sort. In that case a C&R eligible gun must be mailed by him as stated in c. above but that does not mean that the end recipient has to undergo a BATF background check to pick up the gun. If the end recipient has a C&R license he should be able to pick it up from the FFL holder without the NICS check, as long as the mailed item qualifies as a C&R weapon.
"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
A C&R license holder can receive a rifle or shotgun directly without going through an 01 FFL holder if the gun falls into the C&R definition. That is the main reason I have a C&R. A lot of the respondents on this forum have thrown in handguns and just added to the confusion. Just my 2 cents worth.
Paul
…why I, an unlicensed person, can mail a C&R long gun to an FFL dealer, but not to a C&R FFL licensee, but 2 C&R FFL licensees can mail C&Rs to each other as stated in d. above. I don’t understand why the PO would make that distinction. And the obvious contradiction published by ATF on their website and in their booklet “A nonlicensee may mail a shotgun or rifle to a resident of his or her own State or to a licensee in any State.” When a C&R holder is in fact a FFL licensee. I have a C&R in front of me. It says on the top Federal Firearms License. And six times on the license refers to the C&R holder as a licensee. I just thought perhaps someone has been through this and gotten a definitive answer from someone.
Greetings Wolfbait:
I know…it’s absurd; absolutely crazy and contradicting in too many ways! It’s much too easy for an honest, law-abiding person who wants to do things right to get into trouble inadvertently. Criminals don’t spent much time pondering and communicating like we are here.
From my experience as a licensed collector, most all of the firearms rules & regulations pertain to FFL licensees who engage in the business of manufacturing, repairing, selling, etc. Although the C&R license physically appears virtually the same as any other commercial-type FFL, and comes from the same source, a private collector doesn’t have to meet the same requirements and oversight as those engaged in a firearms business. A C&R holder basically is not considered a true “FFL licensee” in many respects (i.e. C&R can’t ship a handgun USPS like an “FFL licensee”).
A Type 03 Curio & Relic license serves only to assist private collectors in engaging in their hobby; nothing more. And believe me, at times it can be extremely challenging and frustrating dealing with those who are not familiar with the C&R, don’t know the rules pertaining to, don’t want to and simply refuse to deal with C&R holders (in particular some 01 FFLs, etc.).
I’ve also found there seems to be extremely limited info/guidance with “gray-area” C&R issues, as you’re now experiencing. To make it even much more convoluted, some state laws can really throw a “monkey wrench” into the equation.
Between all the federal and state laws, shipping regulations, my state’s insane accountability system, etc. I’ve learned to become a better reader out of necessity; it’s easy to accept what you hear and read on the Internet as gospel, and perhaps very tempting and easy to take a “shortcut” to save time or money; but in the end it could potentially prove very costly in more ways than one. Not worth it! In order to save $75.00 on overnight air shipping I once had an FFL gunsmith tell me to ship a pistol via common carrier “Ground” service to his shop by putting the upper receiver in one package and the lower in another, not declaring there was a firearm inside (the lower receiver package), and to write “Machine Parts” under “Contents” on the shipping document. Told me he did it all the time. If that gun (lower receiver) ever turned up missing, etc., do you think for a second he’d be a witness for my defense at the Federal courthouse? You really have to be careful nowadays.
I sometimes wonder why I renew the C&R, but the one time you unexpectedly find the “right” gun or a fabulous deal when least expected, it’s simply invaluable!
Some much for the “Don’t get me going” I initially posted. You folks are actually therapeutic! Hope I didn’t rub anyone the wrong way, as that sincerely wasn’t my intent. This is a fabulous learning forum in so many ways.
When it comes to the Government, wanting a clarification on “what is” is one thing but trying to figure out “why it is” is another totally different quest, one which will uncover no logic involved whatsoever. In 2013 I purchased 5 Winchesters, all old guns from the 1900’s and 1910’s but none qualifying as pre 1899 “antiques”. Two of these purchases were made 5 days apart, in the same state, in the same city but at different gun shops. In all instances I had to undergo an NICS check and was approved on the spot. In all instances there was an expense involved, paid for in some manner by either the dealer or by me, or by all taxpayers, and in all instances totally unnecessary. What would have made me eligible to purchase an old gun on Tuesday but not on Saturday?
Sorry for going off on an editorial tangent!
"This is the West, sir. When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
Wayne:
All of the guns just mentioned would fall into the curio or relic area. Guns made on or before Dec. 31, 1898 would be antique and could be mailed to anyone. Not all FFL dealers seem to understand this or the C&R rules. That is probably the same reason you had different responses from your different dealers. There are 3 categories to determine a C&R weapon. The most inclusive one is ” have been manufactured at least 50 years prior to the current date, but not including replicas thereof “
Paul
94shorties said
Wayne:
All of the guns just mentioned would fall into the curio or relic area. Guns made on or before Dec. 31, 1898 would be antique and could be mailed to anyone. Not all FFL dealers seem to understand this or the C&R rules. That is probably the same reason you had different responses from your different dealers. There are 3 categories to determine a C&R weapon. The most inclusive one is ” have been manufactured at least 50 years prior to the current date, but not including replicas thereof “
Paul
The answer to your question is easy.
Wincacher said
When it comes to the Government, wanting a clarification on “what is” is one thing but trying to figure out “why it is” is another totally different quest, one which will uncover no logic involved whatsoever. In 2013 I purchased 5 Winchesters, all old guns from the 1900’s and 1910’s but none qualifying as pre 1899 “antiques”. Two of these purchases were made 5 days apart, in the same state, in the same city but at different gun shops. In all instances I had to undergo an NICS check and was approved on the spot. In all instances there was an expense involved, paid for in some manner by either the dealer or by me, or by all taxpayers, and in all instances totally unnecessary. What would have made me eligible to purchase an old gun on Tuesday but not on Saturday?
Sorry for going off on an editorial tangent!
The answer to your question is easy. Those “old guns” bought by an unlicensed person are still modern guns for legal purchase purposes. 1900 or 2015 manufacture date, they both require NICS. In that 5 day gap between purchases you could have committed a crime that made you a prohibited purchaser, been served with a restraining order, or done something else that would cause you to answer yes to a question on the 4473 form. A lot can happen in 5 days.
1 Guest(s)
